| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Topic |
AleRiperKilt
    |
Posted - 2008.08.22 11:59:00 -
[1]
IMHO:
1. Highsec is SUPPOSED TO BE EASY (high reward with low risk)
2. Lowsec is supposed to be HARDER (high risk with low reward)
3. Nullsec is supposed to be the HARDEST (very high risk with very low reward)
If there were better rewards in lowsec/nullsec, the empires would have taken these systems over.
There, I said it. Now flame away.
---
"I live in Los Angeles, where driving is non-consensual pvp" - Arric Rohr |
Franga
NQX Innovations
|
Posted - 2008.08.22 12:00:00 -
[2]
First.
 |
Crumplecorn
Gallente
Eve Cluster Explorations
|
Posted - 2008.08.22 12:02:00 -
[3]
Second.
OP was nonsensical enough to make me LOL.
-
DesuSigs |
Reven Cordelle
Caldari
School of Applied Knowledge
|
Posted - 2008.08.22 12:04:00 -
[4]
Wait what?
Nullsec has very low reward?
Well, shit. What am I supposed to do with this 50m3 of T2 Salvage? I suppose I could trash it.
I mean its not worth anything, got it from nullsec.
|
Maximillian Bayonette
White Lion Manufacture and Salvage
|
Posted - 2008.08.22 12:05:00 -
[5]
Remember this date of August 22nd 2008 as the date where the carebears of Eve finally imploded in stupidity and barrel rolled their way out of the forums.
One can hope, right?
|
Shintai
Gallente
Balad Naran Orbital Shipyards
|
Posted - 2008.08.22 12:06:00 -
[6]
OP fails completely 0/10
--------------------------------------
Abstraction and Transcendence: Nature, Shintai, and Geometry |
Malcanis
We are Legend
eXceed.
|
Posted - 2008.08.22 12:08:00 -
[7]
 Originally by: AleRiperKilt
IMHO:
1. Highsec is SUPPOSED TO BE EASY (low reward with low risk)
2. Lowsec is supposed to be HARDER (high risk with low reward)
3. Nullsec is supposed to be the HARDEST (very high risk with very high reward)
If there were better rewards in lowsec/nullsec, the empires would have taken these systems over.
There, I said it. Now flame away.
You got something very important wrong, but I fixed it for you. Why on earth would you think that the best rewards should be in the safest space? In what way does that make sense? In the "I want stuff without fighting for it, therefore I deserve it because I'm a special snowflake" way?
CONCORD provide consequences, not safety; only you can do that. |
5pinDizzy
Amarr
Umpteenth Podding
|
Posted - 2008.08.22 12:11:00 -
[8]
Edited by: 5pinDizzy on 22/08/2008 12:12:36
This must be a troll, if it isn't then ... 
OP is right though TBH, it's not enough that a considerable majority are crammed into highsec huddled together like frightened children, it should be all of us!
|
Aubrey Luna
|
Posted - 2008.08.22 12:12:00 -
[9]
Nature of humans prefer Low Risk High Gain (Empire lvl4)
Rare Few Choose High Risk High Gain (null/0.0 space)
Stupid choose High Risk Low Gain (Low-sec)
|
|
CCP Navigator
C C P
|
Posted - 2008.08.22 12:13:00 -
[10]
*sigh*
Locked.
Navigator
Community Representative
CCP Hf, EVE Online
Email / Netfang
|
|
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |