Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 .. 13 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Dyner
Midgard Protectorate
77
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 15:54:00 -
[211] - Quote
cBOLTSON wrote:Hell yes would LOVE graphical updates especially if that brings with it better collision detection and actual shields!!
+1
This!
The perfect shield affect is all ready in-game; Invul Field. It's got a steady effect that doesn't "pulse" like the shield booster effect.
And honestly, the Star Trek model of shielding is not practical, it takes far less energy to create a field near the surface than is required to extend the field out enough to create an spherical "shell".
...just would need a new effect for the Invul Field
Also, I really don't care if people don't have DX11 cards, there's no excuse for it.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=100007709%20600007818&IsNodeId=1&bop=And&ShowDeactivatedMark=False&Order=PRICE&PageSize=20
If you can't afford ~$50 USD then you shouldn't be playing video games; you have more important things to worry about. |
Ravcharas
GREY COUNCIL Nulli Secunda
123
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 16:27:00 -
[212] - Quote
The only reason CCP framed this as a crowdsourcing thing is because they knew pretty much everyone woud be in favor of it anyway. No way should it be up to the players how the devs go about future-proofing their tech. Veritas doesn't start a poll on if, how and when the lag monster needs a kick in the ass. The number of players who could bullet point the technical pros and cons this will have is pretty much nil, because we don't know **** about what goes on under the eve engine hood.
CCP have technical directors and engineers to make this call. Besides, we have no idea what those man-months would be spent on otherwise, and no way of knowing if it would turn out good in the end. |
Nalha Saldana
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
182
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 16:39:00 -
[213] - Quote
New graphics worth the time? Yes.
New more accurate Physics? YES PLEASE |
Kimiko Tojima
Daughters of Hada
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 16:58:00 -
[214] - Quote
DO IT ! DO IT ! DO IT ! |
Lolmer
Yahoo Inc Caffeine Nicotine and Hate
21
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 18:50:00 -
[215] - Quote
The response to a friend whom used to play EvE Online when I linked him EVE Fanfest Cinematic Trailer 2012 :
Redacted wrote: 09:20 <@Redacted> Lolmer: now if only the game looked like the cinematic trailer 09:20 <@Redacted> I might still be playin 09:20 <@Redacted> because that's particularly epic
|
Sgt Napalm
Veto. Veto Corp
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 19:11:00 -
[216] - Quote
Do it. After speaking with the nVidia representative and hearing more about the new cards with their reduced power and noise I would want to upgrade anyways. |
Alex Tremayne
Lyrus Associates The Star Fraction
24
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 19:25:00 -
[217] - Quote
Definitely want the DX11 upgrade. |
Ava Katelo
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 20:20:00 -
[218] - Quote
Jesus Christ, this again?
Every mother ******* year since Trinity I swear to god.
CCP HAS NEVER and WILL NEVER force you to upgrade your PC to the "Ultra" settings level.
On another note you can get DX11 cards for 50$, get the **** off your poor ass and upgrade your rig every once and a while, if you upgrade it for Incarna chances are you can run DX11. |
Fly byNighter
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 20:25:00 -
[219] - Quote
I cant wait for the eye candy
Thanks ccp |
Altimo
Clan Hyena Axiom Solaris
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 20:46:00 -
[220] - Quote
Yes, and to all the nay sayers, by the time they even are able to release this, you should have your computer upgraded anyway. Time to get out of the stone age people. |
|
Roll Sizzle Beef
Space Mutiny
116
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 20:51:00 -
[221] - Quote
I bring my meager text in support of moar graphics. Just another step forward for internet spaceships. |
T'amber Anomandari Demaleon
530
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 20:57:00 -
[222] - Quote
Why are we even voting on this. The answer is obvious.
OP, perhaps a little deeper explanation on what people are voting for (even if unneccessary)?
www.shipsofeve.com
|
Roll Sizzle Beef
Space Mutiny
116
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 21:02:00 -
[223] - Quote
T'amber Anomandari Demaleon wrote:Why are we even voting on this. The answer is obvious.
OP, perhaps a little deeper explanation on what people are voting for (even if unneccessary)?
Because CCP said they are going to be monitoring forum/game/etc reaction on rather it would be a good idea to pursue such an upgrade at this point in time. Its all on how soon we want resources dedicated to this. |
ivar R'dhak
STK Scientific
14
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 21:07:00 -
[224] - Quote
CCP Peirz wrote:DirectX11 requires Windows Vista or better -- no Windows XP.. The DirectX9 client is not going anywhere anytime soon! Good. Though I`m pretty sure this whole thing is more of a marketing gimmick, have also a +1 from me. Even if it means I have to get rid of my trusty old WinXP and get a Nvidia for the PhysX.
(Pricing of the GTX680, Nvidia R U out of yer fricken minds?? )
BTW, hope it stays all in one client and we won-¦t get another "OLD - NEW client" situation once you-¦re done with implementing Dx11. |
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong White-Lotus
478
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 21:12:00 -
[225] - Quote
ivar R'dhak wrote:CCP Peirz wrote:DirectX11 requires Windows Vista or better -- no Windows XP.. The DirectX9 client is not going anywhere anytime soon! Good. Though I`m pretty sure this whole thing is more of a marketing gimmick, have also a +1 from me. Even if it means I have to get rid of my trusty old WinXP and get a Nvidia for the PhysX. (Pricing of the GTX680, Nvidia R U out of yer fricken minds?? ) BTW, hope it stays all in one client and we won-¦t get another "OLD - NEW client" situation once you-¦re done with implementing Dx11.
It'll just be asetting. turn on or off.
Like HDR or AA |
ivar R'dhak
STK Scientific
14
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 21:16:00 -
[226] - Quote
MotherMoon wrote:ivar R'dhak wrote:CCP Peirz wrote:DirectX11 requires Windows Vista or better -- no Windows XP.. The DirectX9 client is not going anywhere anytime soon! BTW, hope it stays all in one client It'll just be asetting. turn on or off. Like HDR or AA Guess you-¦re right, I-¦m just a bit on the cautious side. |
Flamespar
Woof Club
312
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 22:34:00 -
[227] - Quote
This graphics upgrade should include better ship explosion too.. like the one they should with the ship breaking in half .
I wants I can post on a forum, therefore I represent everyone. |
Glockshna Quant
Versatility Production Corporation' LLC
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 22:55:00 -
[228] - Quote
**** YEAH.
This could open up so many possibilities for graphics sexiness. One thing I think CCP needs to be sure they keep in mind when doing this. Make sure it can be disabled for those who want to multibox more than 2 or 3 characters. The scale-ability portion of the presentation should cover that bit quite well.
~GQ |
Kethry Avenger
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
17
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 23:05:00 -
[229] - Quote
All 3 of my accounts would like the upgrade.
+3 |
BlitZ Kotare
Ars ex Discordia Test Alliance Please Ignore
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 23:31:00 -
[230] - Quote
Do Want. What I saw from the Fanfest stream looked great. |
|
Deathwing Reborn
11
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 23:31:00 -
[231] - Quote
Yes, I would like to see this happen. I would like asteroid interactment as well as the other nice things it provides. |
Ogogov
Ars ex Discordia Test Alliance Please Ignore
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 23:32:00 -
[232] - Quote
So an actual copy of this video is currently nowhere to be found on the entire internet?
*edit*
Here we go:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNxb_nOKcxs |
PaTrond
X-9 Chained Reactions
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 23:38:00 -
[233] - Quote
Of course we would like the update!
The system (adjustable detail level) you've made is pretty much normal in tesselation, but it's awesome as it's adjustable, and therefore hardware friendly. Just hope you'll do more work to the shaders. Oh, it's double win! You don't have to worry about the models for a long time, giving you more time to focus on other stuff, which means we will have more! \o/ |
Terazul
The Scope Gallente Federation
40
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 23:54:00 -
[234] - Quote
I'd just like to note that, if this gets done, then it needs to be done alongside ultra-high-resolution textures. As it is? I can literally count the pixels on the ship texture. The filtering helps blur it out, but it's still a blurry, un-detailed mess, with the tesselation only helping to hide it in certain areas.
Even in EVE right now, anything capital-class looks really blurry viewed from up-close. Hell, even frigates are starting to get a little long in the teeth if you zoom up close to them (kind of important for machinima, ya know?). I'm aware that CCP currently has the uber-high-resolution source textures squared away somewhere - it's just a matter of compressing them and shipping them out. Hell, I'd like to see that get done first, as it can have a major impact on visual fidelity. |
Javelin6
24
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 00:26:00 -
[235] - Quote
Do it. |
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong White-Lotus
482
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 02:52:00 -
[236] - Quote
Terazul wrote:I'd just like to note that, if this gets done, then it needs to be done alongside ultra-high-resolution textures..
No it doesn't, don't speak on things you don't understand. It literally takes new art, just tweaks for ships where the effect looks bad.
Eve already has all of it's texture in 8 times the resolution back at CCP. Think about it, when your making a game, you render big, you paint big, and then you optimize. This allows you to make graphics updates in the future if you wish without tons of work.
The textures in eve are actually very flat now, with the normal map taking over much of the detail. Think about it, you don't have things like vents, or lines on the diffuse map, if the geometry literally changes. There is no reason for anything but color information, everything is done in layers, and usually at 4098x4098 |
Maharal
Klaus Talmudic Academy Games of Divinity
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 05:53:00 -
[237] - Quote
Yes, Do It! |
Maharal
Klaus Talmudic Academy Games of Divinity
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 05:55:00 -
[238] - Quote
yes! |
The Hamilton
Definitive Exploration and Excavations The Watchmen.
13
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 06:04:00 -
[239] - Quote
No
Tessalation seems to have a limited life span in the future. This time should be put towards real game-play improvements instead. |
xxxak
Intergalactic Syndicate Nulli Secunda
153
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 06:05:00 -
[240] - Quote
DO. IT. NAOOOOOOOOOO.
Please. The nerfs to supercaps will cause more super pilots to join the largest alliances who can properly "support" their deployment, further concentrating firepower/wealth in EVE. The end result will be fewer "fun" fights, and will hurt EVE in the long run. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 .. 13 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |