EVE Search - Webs need a stacking penalty.

Search EVE-Online forums for:

All Channels

Game Development Forum

Webs need a stacking penalty.

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Topic
Zeknichov Dark Prophecy Inc. Axiom Empire	Posted - 2008.08.29 18:58:00 - [1] Edited by: Zeknichov on 29/08/2008 19:00:00 Without a stacking penalty on webs the nano changes do nothing except make HACs useless and BS's required to fit two webs. With a web stacking penalty HACs, AFs and CS become more useful. Rebalance tracking and implement a web stacking penalty.
Zeknichov Dark Prophecy Inc. Axiom Empire	Posted - 2008.08.29 18:59:00 - [2] Edited by: Zeknichov on 29/08/2008 18:59:44
Rivqua Caldari Omega Wing R.E.P.O.	Posted - 2008.08.29 19:02:00 - [3] Webs are affected by the stacking penalty rules. /Riv
Zeknichov Dark Prophecy Inc. Axiom Empire	Posted - 2008.08.29 19:14:00 - [4] If a ship is going 1000m/s then two webs on that ship does not equal 250m/s but something higher due to stacking penalty, correct? Otherwise there is no stacking penalty and afaik there is no stacking penalty.
Liang Nuren Perkone	Posted - 2008.08.29 19:32:00 - [5] Two non stacking nerfed webs (they're currently stacking nerfed IIRC) are still less effective than a pre-nerf web. In fact, it would take five non-stacking nerfed webs to reach two present day webs. Remember that webs are stacking nerfed. Also, remember that the web nerf is nerfing the phooey out of blasters. ;-) -Liang -- I object to violence because when it appears to do good, the good is only temporary; the evil it does is permanent. -- Mahatma Gandhi
Zeknichov Dark Prophecy Inc. Axiom Empire	Posted - 2008.08.29 19:35:00 - [6] Edited by: Zeknichov on 29/08/2008 19:35:08 Ah excellent. I'm quite aware of the changes to blasters, but hence why I said rebalance teacking. I find it highly ironic that the weapon with the worst range also has the worst tracking yet the damage is so minimally increased that it does not offset the disadvantages at all.
Liang Nuren Perkone	Posted - 2008.08.29 19:38:00 - [7] Originally by: Zeknichov Edited by: Zeknichov on 29/08/2008 19:35:08 Ah excellent. I'm quite aware of the changes to blasters, but hence why I said rebalance teacking. I find it highly ironic that the weapon with the worst range also has the worst tracking yet the damage is so minimally increased that it does not offset the disadvantages at all. Blasters have the best raw tracking in game... the problems originate from having the worst tracking at their preferred range. -Liang -- I object to violence because when it appears to do good, the good is only temporary; the evil it does is permanent. -- Mahatma Gandhi
Zeknichov Dark Prophecy Inc. Axiom Empire	Posted - 2008.08.29 19:42:00 - [8] Glad you're here to clarify.
Liang Nuren Perkone	Posted - 2008.08.29 19:44:00 - [9] Originally by: Zeknichov Glad you're here to clarify. I find it prevents internet trolls from popping up to inform us that blasters have the best tracking in game and are therefore not in need of a boost. -Liang -- I object to violence because when it appears to do good, the good is only temporary; the evil it does is permanent. -- Mahatma Gandhi
Cpt Branko Surge.	Posted - 2008.08.29 20:45:00 - [10] Originally by: Liang Nuren Blasters have the best raw tracking in game... the problems originate from having the worst tracking at their preferred range. -Liang LIES! Autocannons have worse tracking at their preffered range. Unless they like shooting at reduced damage (read: in falloff)! Boost AC optimal! Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail mods@ccpgames.com ~Saint

Captator Universal Securities	Posted - 2008.08.29 23:26:00 - [11] Originally by: Cpt Branko Originally by: Liang Nuren Blasters have the best raw tracking in game... the problems originate from having the worst tracking at their preferred range. -Liang LIES! Autocannons have worse tracking at their preffered range. Unless they like shooting at reduced damage (read: in falloff)! Boost AC optimal! Noes, this would be MADNESS! What about doubling falloff? suddenly you will do roughly double damage at a given range, and can hit for not very much out to crazy crazy ranges.
Liang Nuren Perkone	Posted - 2008.08.30 00:25:00 - [12] Originally by: Captator Noes, this would be MADNESS! What about doubling falloff? suddenly you will do roughly double damage at a given range, and can hit for not very much out to crazy crazy ranges. I've long considered doubling falloff to be a useful boost. I've been meaning to do some research with it. -Liang -- I object to violence because when it appears to do good, the good is only temporary; the evil it does is permanent. -- Mahatma Gandhi
The Djego Minmatar merovinger inc	Posted - 2008.08.30 00:30:00 - [13] Edited by: The Djego on 30/08/2008 00:31:26 Originally by: Cpt Branko Originally by: Liang Nuren Blasters have the best raw tracking in game... the problems originate from having the worst tracking at their preferred range. -Liang LIES! Autocannons have worse tracking at their preffered range. Unless they like shooting at reduced damage (read: in falloff)! Boost AC optimal! But they use no Cap! People allways forget about the Cap... Jokes aside, the higher Tiers of the Aks could use some reworking for shure, in thermes of Range and Damage. ---- Nerf Tank - Boost Gank! Originally by: Amantus Real men don't need to get into blaster range.
Cpt Branko Surge.	Posted - 2008.08.30 03:34:00 - [14] Originally by: The Djego Edited by: The Djego on 30/08/2008 00:31:26 Originally by: Cpt Branko Originally by: Liang Nuren Blasters have the best raw tracking in game... the problems originate from having the worst tracking at their preferred range. -Liang LIES! Autocannons have worse tracking at their preffered range. Unless they like shooting at reduced damage (read: in falloff)! Boost AC optimal! But they use no Cap! People allways forget about the Cap... Jokes aside, the higher Tiers of the Aks could use some reworking for shure, in thermes of Range and Damage. But they're not V E R T I C A L . Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail mods@ccpgames.com ~Saint
Euriti Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2008.08.30 11:00:00 - [15] Originally by: Cpt Branko Edited by: Cpt Branko on 30/08/2008 03:36:57 Originally by: The Djego Edited by: The Djego on 30/08/2008 00:31:26 Originally by: Cpt Branko Originally by: Liang Nuren Blasters have the best raw tracking in game... the problems originate from having the worst tracking at their preferred range. -Liang LIES! Autocannons have worse tracking at their preffered range. Unless they like shooting at reduced damage (read: in falloff)! Boost AC optimal! But they use no Cap! People allways forget about the Cap... Jokes aside, the higher Tiers of the Aks could use some reworking for shure, in thermes of Range and Damage. They need to be vertical somehow. That'd fix it. Comedy reply. ACs and Blasters need to be revisited if the changes go through and if they don't ACs need it. Blasters are OK on TQ.

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.