Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
JaHanim
|
Posted - 2008.08.30 02:09:00 -
[1]
in the new patch notes i cant read anything about the speed nerf what happend ?
|
BiggestT
Caldari Space Oddysey Pupule 'Ohana
|
Posted - 2008.08.30 02:18:00 -
[2]
yeah talked about it in another thread..seems ccp want to make quadrupely sure
funny how they said, we may even take up to a month to implement this based on feedback when that was like a month 1/2 ago so ud expect itd be in this patch..
Proudly annoying FC's since 2007
|
Deva Blackfire
D00M.
|
Posted - 2008.08.30 02:20:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Deva Blackfire on 30/08/2008 02:20:24 CCP said that newbs must learn how to play game instead of depending on nerfs/boosts
|
JaHanim
|
Posted - 2008.08.30 02:26:00 -
[4]
thanks and i hope it wont come out @_@
|
Deva Blackfire
D00M.
|
Posted - 2008.08.30 02:27:00 -
[5]
nerf was moved back to drawing board
it WILL arrive but not in the stupid way it was on sisi previously.
|
Hurtado Soneka
Caldari State Protectorate
|
Posted - 2008.09.02 13:10:00 -
[6]
as long as it stops rediculous nano***s who cares |
baltec1
Antares Shipyards Vanguard.
|
Posted - 2008.09.02 14:19:00 -
[7]
I have waited this long for my slow boats to stand an equal chance against nano, I can wait a few more months for them to get it just right.
|
XXXAKTIVE
|
Posted - 2008.09.02 15:09:00 -
[8]
I personally dont feel nano nerf is needed. The thing is, that the people that complain and think nano overpowered are the people that mostly never had nano ships. It isn't so easy to pilote nano ship, I assure U. Carebears on Ravens (mostly caldari) complain after being killed by, for example, nano Vagabond.
By lowering the speed and nerfing nano U will totally destroy Minmatar race. Yeah, they have several nice ships like Vagabond, Hugin etc. that rely on speed only. Minmatar marauder is a peace of s.. that is absolutely useless on missions.(compared with golem)
Your idea with nerfing nano will make caldari the main power in EVE. What are U thinking about??
Let the caldari players run their mudane missions and dont spoil the life of players that are in PVP.
Just a tip for U, the main money in EVE comes from PVP people. Carebears mostly dont pay for time codes with real money, so U'd better think before making PVP people life miserable
|
Megan Maynard
Minmatar 17th Minmatar Tactical Wing
|
Posted - 2008.09.02 15:26:00 -
[9]
Originally by: baltec1 I have waited this long for my slow boats to stand an equal chance against nano, I can wait a few more months for them to get it just right.
Where do you live? I want to pop you.
If you can't figure out how to kill a nano'd ship............
Wow.
|
royal killer
Amarr The Funkalistic
|
Posted - 2008.09.02 15:33:00 -
[10]
Edited by: royal killer on 02/09/2008 15:34:26 Lol, nvm. --------------------
*ding ding!*
Wrangler: Hello and w
*ding ding!*
Wrangler: ...damn nanowhiners. |
|
baltec1
Antares Shipyards Vanguard.
|
Posted - 2008.09.02 15:34:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Megan Maynard
Originally by: baltec1 I have waited this long for my slow boats to stand an equal chance against nano, I can wait a few more months for them to get it just right.
Where do you live? I want to pop you.
If you can't figure out how to kill a nano'd ship............
Wow.
I do have a nice anti nano ship and it does very well at chasing off nano HACs.
Heavy Neuts are like bug repelent and pulse lasers slowly chew them up but unfortunatly they have just enough speed to get away most of the time.
A slight reduction in speed would be enough to make me happy. Or better yet, a new line of ships for each race that can use a new toy to turn off the MWD of a target ship at say 30km max and cannot itself be nanoed.
Its all the excuse needed to make a t2 harbringer and paint it black
|
Nerfmycap
|
Posted - 2008.09.02 15:36:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Deva Blackfire Edited by: Deva Blackfire on 30/08/2008 02:20:24 CCP said that newbs must learn how to play game instead of depending on nerfs/boosts
Ooooh dear. Well, having an alliance completely dependant on it I guess it's important it stays the way it is :(
But ye, nano sure is fun, will be something missing where it was. Blobs isn't really all that fun. |
Nerfmycap
|
Posted - 2008.09.02 15:39:00 -
[13]
Edited by: Nerfmycap on 02/09/2008 15:43:10
Originally by: XXXAKTIVE I personally dont feel nano nerf is needed. The thing is, that the people that complain and think nano overpowered are the people that mostly never had nano ships. It isn't so easy to pilote nano ship, I assure U. Carebears on Ravens (mostly caldari) complain after being killed by, for example, nano Vagabond.
By lowering the speed and nerfing nano U will totally destroy Minmatar race. Yeah, they have several nice ships like Vagabond, Hugin etc. that rely on speed only. Minmatar marauder is a peace of s.. that is absolutely useless on missions.(compared with golem)
Your idea with nerfing nano will make caldari the main power in EVE. What are U thinking about??
Let the caldari players run their mudane missions and dont spoil the life of players that are in PVP.
Just a tip for U, the main money in EVE comes from PVP people. Carebears mostly dont pay for time codes with real money, so U'd better think before making PVP people life miserable
Sure, caldari will be better. But also all guns will have easier to track. Way easier. It also changes warfare completely, are you scared of a ravens cruise missiles? no. Ever flown a nanoship that gets hit by for example a sleipnirs/Absolutions guns or apocalypses pulse lasers... ouch.. And that's reality for nanoships after patch, without the rapier holding you down.
I've seen many interesting anti-nano fits. For example a 60ish km range pulse zealot. PEWPEW. Or perhaps a 100km range pulse apoc that eats any recon outside of maybe 20-30km. Remote repair blobs.. Various other longrange HAC's.. recons.. Logistics..
|
Red Thunder
Most Wanted INC G00DFELLAS
|
Posted - 2008.09.02 15:40:00 -
[14]
cant remember where i heard it, but i think its set back til at least next year
Eagles may soar, but weasels dont get sucked into jet engines |
Atsuko Ratu
Caldari VSP Corp.
|
Posted - 2008.09.02 17:08:00 -
[15]
Originally by: XXXAKTIVE
Carebears on Ravens (mostly caldari) complain after being killed by, for example, nano Vagabond.
I wasn't aware there were other racial Ravens
|
Derek Sigres
|
Posted - 2008.09.02 17:17:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Atsuko Ratu
Originally by: XXXAKTIVE
Carebears on Ravens (mostly caldari) complain after being killed by, for example, nano Vagabond.
I wasn't aware there were other racial Ravens
As an interesting correlary to this, the "noob" in a Raven has only two potential outcomes really. Either he fits a web, MWD and/or neut or he dies a VERY slow death. The raven when fitted with BS guns has absolutely no effective way of projecting their firepower on even a T2 vagabond. This isn't necessarily an argument against the vagabond or the raven or the nano concept, just a simple point of fact.
As a side note, if the Raven pilot is well skilled, using cruise missiles and uses explosion velocity rigs he might have a shot at surprising the HELL out of the vaga pilot. You probably STILL won't kill it thanks to it's vastly superior speed but it would take a pimped vaga to really start mitigating the 2.5km/s + explosion velocity such a fit could yield.
|
DennoTheHunter
The Lost Generation
|
Posted - 2008.09.02 17:36:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Derek Sigres
Originally by: Atsuko Ratu
Originally by: XXXAKTIVE
Carebears on Ravens (mostly caldari) complain after being killed by, for example, nano Vagabond.
I wasn't aware there were other racial Ravens
As an interesting correlary to this, the "noob" in a Raven has only two potential outcomes really. Either he fits a web, MWD and/or neut or he dies a VERY slow death. The raven when fitted with BS guns has absolutely no effective way of projecting their firepower on even a T2 vagabond. This isn't necessarily an argument against the vagabond or the raven or the nano concept, just a simple point of fact.
As a side note, if the Raven pilot is well skilled, using cruise missiles and uses explosion velocity rigs he might have a shot at surprising the HELL out of the vaga pilot. You probably STILL won't kill it thanks to it's vastly superior speed but it would take a pimped vaga to really start mitigating the 2.5km/s + explosion velocity such a fit could yield.
Well... at these high speeds a vaga's dps is the same as a frigate, if not even lower. A vaga has 2 options, 1) orbit at slow speeds to do decent dps and risk getting hit by the raven, or 2) orbit at high speeds and do 1x HAM + 5x Light drone dps (or whatever it's fitted), in which case it's pointless.
/Denno |
Lusian
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 00:48:00 -
[18]
Quote: I personally dont feel nano nerf is needed. The thing is, that the people that complain and think nano overpowered are the people that mostly never had nano ships. It isn't so easy to pilote nano ship, I assure U. Carebears on Ravens (mostly caldari) complain after being killed by, for example, nano Vagabond.
By lowering the speed and nerfing nano U will totally destroy Minmatar race. Yeah, they have several nice ships like Vagabond, Hugin etc. that rely on speed only. Minmatar marauder is a peace of s.. that is absolutely useless on missions.(compared with golem)
Your idea with nerfing nano will make caldari the main power in EVE. What are U thinking about??
Let the caldari players run their mudane missions and dont spoil the life of players that are in PVP.
Just a tip for U, the main money in EVE comes from PVP people. Carebears mostly dont pay for time codes with real money, so U'd better think before making PVP people life miserable
You obviousley wernt here in the begining when you could use an entire row of MWD's in your mids. you think you are going fast now ? back in those days you could reach the end of the map in no time.
Basically the MWD was nerfed due to te capaciter. You cant have suc an overpowerd machine. The power you think Gallantians have is nerfed quite a bit and obviousley judgeing from the ships yo fly you haven't the experience to judge from one race of ships to a nouther.
The nano nerf will come, or why not take off the nerf of MWD's and fit as many as mid slots as you have and you can run them all at once. And the cap \ MWD nerf will be taken off and just undoe everything. because people complaine about nerfs and ships being too pwerfull and the complaints of nerfs already in place.
The nano nerf will come, and no you can not match the speed of an intercveptor no matter the size of your cruiser. A vagabond out running an interceptor is a serious unbalance. So if a vagabond can outrun an interceptor then gallantians should have infinate tracking.
Get over yourself and play the game. or just quite. |
Liang Nuren
Perkone
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 01:44:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Nerfmycap Sure, caldari will be better. But also all guns will have easier to track. Way easier.
Blasters are having their tracking cut to a third, by virtue of the web nerf.... so, no, guns are not going to track "way better".
The nano nerf is a *huge* Amarr/Caldari boost, since they don't have to move to get into range anyway.
Quote: It also changes warfare completely, are you scared of a ravens cruise missiles? no.
You will be. They're seriously imbalanced on the test server.
Quote: Ever flown a nanoship that gets hit by for example a sleipnirs/Absolutions guns or apocalypses pulse lasers... ouch.. And that's reality for nanoships after patch, without the rapier holding you down.
Yep, most pulse boats can hit nano ships of today. Nano ships of tomorrow are simply non-existant.
-Liang -- I object to violence because when it appears to do good, the good is only temporary; the evil it does is permanent. -- Mahatma Gandhi |
Rawr Cristina
Caldari Omerta Syndicate
|
Posted - 2008.09.03 01:49:00 -
[20]
Nano nerf is still on Mulplicity. Don't think that just cause CCP made a patch that wasn't the Nano Nerf that they've cancelled it...
- Infectious - |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |