| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Topic |

Mandi'boboo Zapelne
 |
Posted - 2008.09.06 12:57:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Mandi''boboo Zapelne on 06/09/2008 13:02:04 Edited by: Mandi''boboo Zapelne on 06/09/2008 12:58:23
.....The jet can.
Yes, it is, and its completely silly that looting a can or a wreck should have such consequences in gameplay.
Once upon a time they even had to limit the amount of cans you could eject since it was used at gates to make your enemy lag before ariving in a new system, providing one opportunity for a fast kill. But where are we now? All and ever jumpgate got a set of advertising cans. And when you exit from a station in major systems space outside is filled with jetcans. Yes i'm serious, since he day the devs came up with the idea that nabbing a can would make you attackable we have people being blown up for no reason whatsoever, and when done on purpose to set somebody up, GM's hurry in to send warning mails, for what? That people do things according to the rules of the game?
No I have never 'exploited' this built in feature of the game, but time is ripe for a change on even better remove the agression tag.
NPC stations in all region sells deployable cans. And miners too lazy to deploy anchorable cans really have to pay for their own idiotic behavior if they loose something due to negligence!

|

Dzajic
Gallente Federal Defence Union
 |
Posted - 2008.09.06 16:04:00 -
[2]
Only issue there is that "Giant Secure Containers" are, compared to jetcans... well... tiny.
|

Adreenalina Villak
 |
Posted - 2008.09.06 16:53:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Dzajic Only issue there is that "Giant Secure Containers" are, compared to jetcans... well... tiny.
Well the container is only a buffer anyhow and reloading station for transfer in space. If your hauler cant keep the pace your operation wont work in any case. So the size of a secure can is a really minor problem.
|

Man'corr
Minmatar
 |
Posted - 2008.09.08 11:56:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Adreenalina Villak
Originally by: Dzajic Only issue there is that "Giant Secure Containers" are, compared to jetcans... well... tiny.
Well the container is only a buffer anyhow and reloading station for transfer in space. If your hauler cant keep the pace your operation wont work in any case. So the size of a secure can is a really minor problem.
Yeah right. If you can have 1 hauler on standby for every miner we can remove jetcans........
3900 cubic meters are nothing when you can bring in that amount within 3 minutes.
If this would happen, expect mineral prices to rise sharply. 3 Hulsk can keep a hauler occupied. With this change youd lose a hulk to get a second hauler.
Kill Jetcans and give us Secures with 20k space. Thats ok. All of above post was formulated wth 100% honesty and 100% sarcasm. Now i only need to get drunk
Back after a 4 Year Hiatus. Damn whats Capital ships? |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |