|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Reply to Topic | Show CCP posts - 30 post(s) |
Revii Lagoon
The Foreign Legion
Test Alliance Please Ignore
30
    |
Posted - 2012.03.27 02:32:00 -
[1] - Quote
As a recruiter for my corp, If there was some sort of public display such as a decoration that you couldn't remove that displayed that character as a flagged botter. Possibly they could get this "Award" when they receive the first warning for botting. I would immediately reject a person regardless of circumstances if they had this sort of flag. I'm sure multiple corps would do this as well, not only would it discourage botting because trying to get into a respectable alliance (Mind you some corps in TEST do have slightly higher recruitment standards) would be very difficult.
If it was just a public list, that's just one more thing for me to check as a recruiter, and it would let us kick people out who were botting, because it is kinda hard to keep track of everyone in corp sometimes. And please do something with the API as well, having that info be available on an account wide API key would be very very handy as well. |
Revii Lagoon
The Foreign Legion
Test Alliance Please Ignore
30
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 02:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:Andski wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:Being familiar with how things work you know I'd just make a corp and publish the info using some really cool API app. :(
I agree with the spirit but the devil is in the implementation. I don't get it - who would shotgun apply to every corp in sight if their account was flagged for botting? So the flag would only be available upon application and not just generally to all CEOs? I may have missed that and this intrigues me.
If CEO's are doing recruitment then they probably need to delegate roles a bit better. Anyone with roles to accept applications should be able to see it. But that isn't enough, most of the time people who apply have already been accepted because they went through the recrutiment process and were already accepted. The actual application is just there because it is necessary, but holds no substance in terms of the recruitment process.
This info being avaliable through the API would be ideal because any sane corp who does recruitment uses the API to check things. |
Revii Lagoon
The Foreign Legion
Test Alliance Please Ignore
30
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 02:51:00 -
[3] - Quote
Sisohiv wrote:
You will understand if people miss things on the tickertape forum.
If they are making Bot chars account locked, the motive for flagging them with stars is kind of not there.
Bot bann gets you -10.00 makes more sense.
I wouldn't even bann them. Just run Sec -10.00 and all 4 empires -10.00 on third offence.
Terrible idea, most bots operate in 0.0 anyways so it would do nothing. |
Revii Lagoon
The Foreign Legion
Test Alliance Please Ignore
30
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 02:59:00 -
[4] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:
Every alliance isn't a mega-alliance and the structures can be different. I think you'll find that most corps are actually fairly small.
Just because corps are structured differently doesn't mean that some would see a large benefit from having API information knowing if someone was a botter. In terms of corp recruitment process, unless a corp has a specific open door policy, such as EVE UNI or Red vs Blue, then most likely there will be some sort of interview before hand.
Restricting how info about someone who is flagged as a botter will only make it harder for the people who recruit. If after a long interview process they were to only find out on their actual application that they were a know botter, that would mean a lot of wasted effort on recruiters part because some may have a strict no-botting policy. |
Revii Lagoon
The Foreign Legion
Test Alliance Please Ignore
30
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 03:02:00 -
[5] - Quote
Andski wrote:Revii Lagoon wrote:Terrible idea, most bots operate in 0.0 anyways so it would do nothing. Didn't the security presentation show that most bots were in hisec?
Go to the drone regions before massive civil wars..... |
|
|
| |
Reply to Topic |