Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 .. 43 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 70 post(s) |
Tehg Rhind
Atlantic Innovations
10
|
Posted - 2012.04.25 01:29:00 -
[1111] - Quote
This is flat out painful to read. |
Vheroki
FinFleet Raiden.
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.25 15:52:00 -
[1112] - Quote
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=R2ti9DFeRMI
Watch it Greyscale look how you "balanced" the game , great job man i mena after all that is what you intended to make a dread to blap supports ships a 3 bil ship and a titan for 70 bil to sit at pos.
CONGRATULATION CCP!!!! nice balance |
Pesadel0
the muppets RED.OverLord
34
|
Posted - 2012.04.25 16:17:00 -
[1113] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:MisterAl tt1 wrote:Quote:Ships
Titans can now lock a maximum of three targets. XL turrets have had their signature resolution set to 2000m. Capital Turrets that are fitted to titans now have a new damage-scaling attribute; targets with a signature radius smaller than this size will take reduced damage from these turrets. This does not apply to dreadnaughts. Siege modules have had their tracking penalty removed. So, what are the effects for dreads? Increased tracking in siege (it is not written, that XL turrets get their tracking nerfed) but on the other hand - lesser chance to hit due to sig.res. ? Anyone calculated how will it change the sutuation? Or CCP again forgot to write some things into patchnotes? OK. Seems like soe clever guy wrote it right: [16:35:06] Fatyn > dreads out of siege nerfed but who cares [16:35:13] Fatyn > the patch notes say [16:35:16] Fatyn > in siege [16:35:27] Fatyn > tracking doubled, Turret Sig Res doubled [16:35:45] Fatyn > these two effects cancel each other out in the tracking formula Yup. Consequences are halved tracking out of siege and identical tracking in siege. We could've just gone with a tracking nerf, but kicking the sig res up to a more capital-normal range seemed like a more intuitively acceptable adjustment, and gives the advantage that for titans both values (sig res and damage reduction) sit at 2k, reinforcing their role as anti-capital ships.
Thank you grey now for my tracking dread , owning noobs. |
steave435
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
63
|
Posted - 2012.04.25 21:19:00 -
[1114] - Quote
Vheroki wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=R2ti9DFeRMI
Watch it Greyscale look how you "balanced" the game , great job man i mena after all that is what you intended to make a dread to blap supports ships a 3 bil ship and a titan for 70 bil to sit at pos.
CONGRATULATION CCP!!!! nice balance
Notice how that one Mael that wasn't ******** and didn't fly straight at you didn't die? Yeah, me too. There are plenty of things that can deal with the much smaller, much lower EHP, stationary, slower locking and *slightly* harder to repair dreads if they know how to fly their ships. A dread shooting at subcaps that are ignoring him will give that result though. |
Baki Yuku
Nordgoetter Viking Empire
8
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 16:04:00 -
[1115] - Quote
steave435 wrote:Vheroki wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=R2ti9DFeRMI
Watch it Greyscale look how you "balanced" the game , great job man i mena after all that is what you intended to make a dread to blap supports ships a 3 bil ship and a titan for 70 bil to sit at pos.
CONGRATULATION CCP!!!! nice balance Notice how that one Mael that wasn't ******** and didn't fly straight at you didn't die? Yeah, me too. There are plenty of things that can deal with the much smaller, much lower EHP, stationary, slower locking and *slightly* harder to repair dreads if they know how to fly their ships. A dread shooting at subcaps that are ignoring him will give that result though.
Yup, that movie just proves one thing that 99,9% of all power bloc pilots are pretty dumb.. and no dreads are not the next best blapping tool not by a long shoot and CCP solution for titan damage is a freaking joke no offense but with the way they are now they wont be seen on the battlefield anymore because they have no role anymore anti-capital weapon? Don't joke with me a anti-capital weapon that can only be used every 10 minutes is the same as no anti-capital weapon at all. XL turrets? Seriously? Have you seen the damage they do now to carrier pilots who get skirmish bonus and plug in a booster drug..
I'm not saying that titans where fine the way they where until now but now you've removed them from the battlefield which is stupid because a titan is a combat ship right? So how long will we have to wait for a real solution to titans? 6 months or 3 years? I'd like to know because in my eye making the biggest ship in eve *undesirable* kinda defeats the purpose of having it in the game in the first place. |
steave435
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
63
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 17:45:00 -
[1116] - Quote
Baki Yuku wrote:Yup, that movie just proves one thing that 99,9% of all power bloc pilots are pretty dumb.. and no dreads are not the next best blapping tool not by a long shoot and CCP solution for titan damage is a freaking joke no offense but with the way they are now they wont be seen on the battlefield anymore because they have no role anymore anti-capital weapon? Don't joke with me a anti-capital weapon that can only be used every 10 minutes is the same as no anti-capital weapon at all. XL turrets? Seriously? Have you seen the damage they do now to carrier pilots who get skirmish bonus and plug in a booster drug..
I'm not saying that titans where fine the way they where until now but now you've removed them from the battlefield which is stupid because a titan is a combat ship right? So how long will we have to wait for a real solution to titans? 6 months or 3 years? I'd like to know because in my eye making the biggest ship in eve *undesirable* kinda defeats the purpose of having it in the game in the first place. Add 2 painters and there's nothing that can get a carrier down below the damage reduction treshold. The only problem is triage carriers, but even then it's not too bad unless he has halos. Carriers can counter sub caps, and then supers come in and kill the carriers. |
Mfume Apocal
Origin. Black Legion.
412
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 20:47:00 -
[1117] - Quote
Vheroki wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=R2ti9DFeRMI
Watch it Greyscale look how you "balanced" the game , great job man i mena after all that is what you intended to make a dread to blap supports ships a 3 bil ship and a titan for 70 bil to sit at pos.
CONGRATULATION CCP!!!! nice balance
The bitterness is strong.
A solo tracking dread was brought in for additional DPS against shield-tanked, perma-MWDing BCs. It still killed far fewer than the support fleet, despite having roughly the same DPS (19 Tengus firing EM missiles vs. a 3 heatsink + T2 dmg rig Rev w/ T2 siege module). You probably aren't going to see a massive subcapital holocaust thanks to tracking dreads any time soon. |
Nalianna
Rogue Clones Yulai Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 08:59:00 -
[1118] - Quote
I used to aspire to flying a Titan. Now that CCP have "adjusted" Titans, I have no interest in them anymore. If CCP don't stop nerfing ships, and start intelligently coming up with ways for ships to be improved to counter other ships that are seen as superior, I seriously doubt I will continue to play. EVE should be evolutionary only - there is no excuse for deliberately negatively impacting the capabilities of a ship. That's just distructive.
In the case of Titans, I firmly believe the Doomsday Devices should be restored to their full Area of Effect glory, or they will forever more cease to have a role. And I believe their needs to be ships with that role in EVE. Titans without the ability to deploy and area of effect superweapon that can take out any and all ships below a certain EHP are not worth having and certainly noone is going to take them into a fight. What use are they now?
For the record, I am opposed to any and all nerfs of any kind to any ship. The only reasonable and believable way for a superior ship to be dealt with is for another ship to be improved in some way to counter it. But if you don't like that Titans can take out any ships near them, don't go near them. The KISS principle applies here. |
Sigras
Conglomo IMPERIAL LEGI0N
115
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 16:01:00 -
[1119] - Quote
Nalianna wrote:I used to aspire to flying a Titan. Now that CCP have "adjusted" Titans, I have no interest in them anymore. If CCP don't stop nerfing ships, and start intelligently coming up with ways for ships to be improved to counter other ships that are seen as superior, I seriously doubt I will continue to play. EVE should be evolutionary only - there is no excuse for deliberately negatively impacting the capabilities of a ship. That's just distructive.
In the case of Titans, I firmly believe the Doomsday Devices should be restored to their full Area of Effect glory, or Titans will forever more cease to have a role. And I believe there need to be ships with that role in EVE. Titans without the ability to deploy an area of effect superweapon that can take out any and all ships below a certain EHP are not worth having and certainly noone is going to take them into a fight. What use are they now?
For the record, I am opposed to any and all nerfs of any kind to any ship. The only reasonable and believable way for a superior ship to be dealt with is for another ship to be improved in some way to counter it. But if you don't like that Titans can take out any ships near them, don't go near them. The KISS principle applies here. have you ever heard of power creep? what youre talking about isnt power creep, its power leap
Allow me to illustrate, right now, the drake has more EHP and better or equal damage projection as all the other battlecruisers, as well as having an easy time fitting things.
With your idea of never nerfing a ship you would have them buff every other battlecruiser to the drake's level . . . but then what happens to cruisers? they get left behind, so you have to buff them too . . . then battleships become not worth their cost, so you have to buff them too, then dreads are too easily killed by subcaps, so they need a buff . . .
I agree that the titan should be an anti blob ship, but the ability to instantly guarantee the destruction of every subcap on the grid is too powerful, and yes, 4x DD basically guarantees that.
They literally never saw combat when they had that ability, all they were ever used for was bridging and drive-by DDs. Rather I think they should apply an AOE E-war effect to all ships on grid based on their racial e-war with the DD skill reducing its effectiveness on your fleet. This way, they wouldnt be a fleet unto themselves, they would just make your fleet way more effective. I believe that supercaps should never be able to be a homogenous fleet. |
Mfume Apocal
Origin. Black Legion.
413
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 03:54:00 -
[1120] - Quote
Nalianna wrote:I used to aspire to flying a Titan. Now that CCP have "adjusted" Titans, I have no interest in them anymore. If CCP don't stop nerfing ships, and start intelligently coming up with ways for ships to be improved to counter other ships that are seen as superior, I seriously doubt I will continue to play. EVE should be evolutionary only - there is no excuse for deliberately negatively impacting the capabilities of a ship. That's just distructive.
[03:40:10] Mordeth Aridhol > 03:38:58 Combat BlaCkXioN (Dual Modal Giga Pulse Laser I) hits you for 20643 damage
You are silly if you think titans can't sexually assault now. |
|
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3914
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 06:39:00 -
[1121] - Quote
Nalianna wrote:I used to aspire to flying a Titan. Now that CCP have "adjusted" Titans, I have no interest in them anymore. If CCP don't stop nerfing ships, and start intelligently coming up with ways for ships to be improved to counter other ships that are seen as superior, I seriously doubt I will continue to play. EVE should be evolutionary only - there is no excuse for deliberately negatively impacting the capabilities of a ship. That's just distructive.
In the case of Titans, I firmly believe the Doomsday Devices should be restored to their full Area of Effect glory, or Titans will forever more cease to have a role. And I believe there need to be ships with that role in EVE. Titans without the ability to deploy an area of effect superweapon that can take out any and all ships below a certain EHP are not worth having and certainly noone is going to take them into a fight. What use are they now?
For the record, I am opposed to any and all nerfs of any kind to any ship. The only reasonable and believable way for a superior ship to be dealt with is for another ship to be improved in some way to counter it. But if you don't like that Titans can take out any ships near them, don't go near them. The KISS principle applies here.
first step towards owning a titan is leaving hisec "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |
Nalianna
Rogue Clones Yulai Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.29 13:32:00 -
[1122] - Quote
Andski wrote:first step towards owning a titan is leaving hisec
Already in null. Can't say I approve of the way you guys are trying to change the game to suit yourselves. |
Nalianna
Rogue Clones Yulai Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.29 14:15:00 -
[1123] - Quote
Sigras wrote:Nalianna wrote:I used to aspire to flying a Titan. Now that CCP have "adjusted" Titans, I have no interest in them anymore. If CCP don't stop nerfing ships, and start intelligently coming up with ways for ships to be improved to counter other ships that are seen as superior, I seriously doubt I will continue to play. EVE should be evolutionary only - there is no excuse for deliberately negatively impacting the capabilities of a ship. That's just distructive.
In the case of Titans, I firmly believe the Doomsday Devices should be restored to their full Area of Effect glory, or Titans will forever more cease to have a role. And I believe there need to be ships with that role in EVE. Titans without the ability to deploy an area of effect superweapon that can take out any and all ships below a certain EHP are not worth having and certainly noone is going to take them into a fight. What use are they now?
For the record, I am opposed to any and all nerfs of any kind to any ship. The only reasonable and believable way for a superior ship to be dealt with is for another ship to be improved in some way to counter it. But if you don't like that Titans can take out any ships near them, don't go near them. The KISS principle applies here. have you ever heard of power creep? what youre talking about isnt power creep, its power leapAllow me to illustrate, right now, the drake has more EHP and better or equal damage projection as all the other battlecruisers, as well as having an easy time fitting things. With your idea of never nerfing a ship you would have them buff every other battlecruiser to the drake's level . . . but then what happens to cruisers? they get left behind, so you have to buff them too . . . then battleships become not worth their cost, so you have to buff them too, then dreads are too easily killed by subcaps, so they need a buff . . . I agree that the titan should be an anti blob ship, but the ability to instantly guarantee the destruction of every subcap on the grid is too powerful, and yes, 4x DD basically guarantees that. They literally never saw combat when they had that ability, all they were ever used for was bridging and drive-by DDs. Rather I think they should apply an AOE E-war effect to all ships on grid based on their racial e-war with the DD skill reducing its effectiveness on your fleet. This way, they wouldnt be a fleet unto themselves, they would just make your fleet way more effective. I believe that supercaps should never be able to be a homogenous fleet.
|
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3936
|
Posted - 2012.04.29 18:16:00 -
[1124] - Quote
thank you for your valuable insights Nalianna, member of the notable sovholding alliance Yulai Federation, known for vast holdings and a substantial supercapital fleet "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |
Vheroki
FinFleet Raiden.
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.29 22:30:00 -
[1125] - Quote
Andski wrote:thank you for your valuable insights Nalianna, member of the notable sovholding alliance Yulai Federation, known for vast holdings and a substantial supercapital fleet
Go grab a trasher and suicide someone in jita and leave the forums to others thanks. |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3942
|
Posted - 2012.04.29 23:55:00 -
[1126] - Quote
Vheroki wrote:Andski wrote:thank you for your valuable insights Nalianna, member of the notable sovholding alliance Yulai Federation, known for vast holdings and a substantial supercapital fleet Go grab a trasher and suicide someone in jita and leave the forums to others thanks.
go take your space back (ahahaha) "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |
Nalianna
Rogue Clones Yulai Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.01 02:23:00 -
[1127] - Quote
Andski wrote:thank you for your valuable insights Nalianna, member of the notable sovholding alliance Yulai Federation, known for vast holdings and a substantial supercapital fleet
Simply disdaining or ignoring other players' wishes and views does nothing to engender positive progress in the game. If CCP continues to implement changes to the game that suit a vocal minority who would prefer a bland, uninteresting universe of more or less equal ships which only show distinction by being in larger blobs which win the fight by simple numbers, then players like myself will leave the game never to return. Ultimately, this would mean the game would be populated only by those players who prefer that type of game universe, and the game will suffer. EVE started off with the richness of variety, in roles, sizes, techniques, weaponry and tactics. This is what attracted me to the game. Without all that, the game isn't worth the money I'm paying for my four accounts. I would be better off elsewhere, and while you may believe that would be no loss, when you have noone else to fight but the likes of yourselves, you may wish for the days when there was a bit more variety. And CCP may wish for the days when they had a lot more subscribers. |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3954
|
Posted - 2012.05.01 05:03:00 -
[1128] - Quote
Nalianna wrote:Andski wrote:thank you for your valuable insights Nalianna, member of the notable sovholding alliance Yulai Federation, known for vast holdings and a substantial supercapital fleet Simply disdaining or ignoring other players' wishes and views does nothing to engender positive progress in the game. If CCP continues to implement changes to the game that suit a vocal minority who would prefer a bland, uninteresting universe of more or less equal ships which only show distinction by being in larger blobs which win the fight by simple numbers, then players like myself will leave the game never to return. Ultimately, this would mean the game would be populated only by those players who prefer that type of game universe, and the game will suffer. EVE started off with the richness of variety, in roles, sizes, techniques, weaponry and tactics. This is what attracted me to the game. Without all that, the game isn't worth the money I'm paying for my four accounts. I would be better off elsewhere, and while you may believe that would be no loss, when you have noone else to fight but the likes of yourselves, you may wish for the days when there was a bit more variety. And CCP may wish for the days when they had a lot more subscribers.
AoE doomsdays were removed when it was shown that an entire carrier fleet could be potentially wiped out by them, which would not be good for the game, sorry
but please continue to moan in your corner over nerfs to a ship that you will never own "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |
Nalianna
Rogue Clones Yulai Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.01 06:09:00 -
[1129] - Quote
Andski wrote:AoE doomsdays were removed when it was shown that an entire carrier fleet could be potentially wiped out by them, which would not be good for the game, sorry
but please continue to moan in your corner over nerfs to a ship that you will never own
Whether or not that would be good for the game is a matter of opinion, in this case yours. There would be others who believe otherwise, and like me, see AOE Doomsdays as one of the things that made the game more interesting. Just because you and your friends don't like something doesn't mean that it's wrong. The fact that you think it is makes it obvious you continue to miss the point I'm making.
And you're right, I probably never will own a Titan. I can't see the point anymore. |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3956
|
Posted - 2012.05.01 07:19:00 -
[1130] - Quote
Nalianna wrote:There would be others who believe otherwise, and like me, see AOE Doomsdays as one of the things that made the game more interesting.
yeah jumping into a blackscreen for an hour and dying to multiple AoE doomsdays made the game super interesting
getting multiple doomsdayed under a cynojammer made the game interesting
you are clearly qualified to talk about these things, providence dweller "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |
|
Misanth
RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE
571
|
Posted - 2012.05.01 16:27:00 -
[1131] - Quote
I came to the forum to update my EFT, and got stuck in this thread. What's your excuse? shiptoastin' liek a baws |
Andy Landen
Tartarus Ventures Surely You're Joking
20
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 02:04:00 -
[1132] - Quote
There should be a trade-off to the Titan DD. If the EHP was reduced on both the Titans and the Moms down to little more than regular caps, and the DD was like a big smartbomb, centered on the Titan activating it, then multiple Titans doing an AOE DD might actually kill each other even if they are blue to each other. They would have to use it more strategically. Scale the damage by ship signature so that subcaps could also survive a single DD.
Could also make Titans to be anti-super ships instead of just anti-nonsupercap ships. Make it as easy for a group of Titans to alpha a super as a nonsupercap. |
Nalianna
Rogue Clones Yulai Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 03:36:00 -
[1133] - Quote
Andy Landen wrote:There should be a trade-off to the Titan DD. If the EHP was reduced on both the Titans and the Moms down to little more than regular caps, and the DD was like a big smartbomb, centered on the Titan activating it, then multiple Titans doing an AOE DD might actually kill each other even if they are blue to each other. They would have to use it more strategically. Scale the damage by ship signature so that subcaps could also survive a single DD.
Could also make Titans to be anti-super ships instead of just anti-nonsupercap ships. Make it as easy for a group of Titans to alpha a super as a nonsupercap.
Yes, exactly. Don't just nerf stuff that people don't like. Intelligently balance, but leave the basis of each weapon and ship be. |
Nalianna
Rogue Clones Yulai Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 03:42:00 -
[1134] - Quote
Andski wrote:Nalianna wrote:There would be others who believe otherwise, and like me, see AOE Doomsdays as one of the things that made the game more interesting. yeah jumping into a blackscreen for an hour and dying to multiple AoE doomsdays made the game super interesting getting multiple doomsdayed under a cynojammer made the game interesting you are clearly qualified to talk about these things, providence dweller
And yet again you continue to miss my point. If you don't like something, find a counter to it, don't just keep trying to do the same thing time and time again and expecting a different outcome. Einstein had something to say about that.
As for being a Providence dweller, that's completely irrelevant. I don't now fly a titan, nor do I know anyone who does, even distantly, this is about not nerfing the game because a group of people don't like certain aspects of it. Everytime an element of the game is leveled (as opposed to balanced), the game loses and so do all the players. Some lose immediately, but eventually we all do because the game becomes bland and unimaginative. It's just not reasonable to think that a ship like a Titan would not have an AoE weapon of some sort - every other size of ship does, why not a Titan. And the idea that it can magically only hit capitals is ludicrous.
CCP, please stop nerfing the game. |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3972
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 04:14:00 -
[1135] - Quote
Nalianna wrote:It's just not reasonable to think that a ship like a Titan would not have an AoE weapon of some sort - every other size of ship does, why not a Titan.
Something like smartbombs, which are far from uncommon in titan fits? "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3972
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 04:16:00 -
[1136] - Quote
tell me how to counter 30 titans sitting inside a cynojammer POS, only poking out to fire off their doomsdays on the fleet sieging the jammer
clearly this is an effortless endeavor for somebody with rich experience in fleet PvP like yourself
AoE doomsdays were a dumb mechanic and anybody who says they should be added back is unqualified to talk about nullsec in any context "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |
steave435
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
63
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 05:39:00 -
[1137] - Quote
Andski wrote:AoE doomsdays were a dumb mechanic and anybody who says they should be added back is unqualified to talk about nullsec in any context FYP |
Nalianna
Rogue Clones Yulai Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 06:26:00 -
[1138] - Quote
Andski wrote:tell me how to counter 30 titans sitting inside a cynojammer POS, only poking out to fire off their doomsdays on the fleet sieging the jammer
clearly this is an effortless endeavor for somebody with rich experience in fleet PvP like yourself
AoE doomsdays were a dumb mechanic and anybody who says they should be added back is unqualified to talk about nullsec in any context
And you're still missing my point. It's obvious that you will never get what I'm on about. Perhaps it's that you simply don't want to. |
Andy Landen
Tartarus Ventures Surely You're Joking
20
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 16:48:00 -
[1139] - Quote
Andski wrote:tell me how to counter 30 titans sitting inside a cynojammer POS, only poking out to fire off their doomsdays on the fleet sieging the jammer
clearly this is an effortless endeavor for somebody with rich experience in fleet PvP like yourself
AoE doomsdays were a dumb mechanic and anybody who says they should be added back is unqualified to talk about nullsec in any context If the DD was AoE AND the EHP for supers were reduced a lot AND the damage was scaled to ship signature radius so that ships took about the same percentage of damage to their shield and armor, then and only then the tactic of nose poking for DD firing would prove difficult for the Titans because they would be hitting each other as well as the opposing fleet AND if they stayed inside the shields then they could not be RR'd unlike the opposing fleet. |
ilammy
Red Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 17:35:00 -
[1140] - Quote
How about boosting titans' DPS against supercaps? To say... 40-60k. Just to lineup them with dreads in terms of DPS/EHP ratio in 'same class vs. same class' battles. Leave their anticapital and antistucture dps about the present '10k like a dreadnought' GÇô we already have dreadnoughts to shoot poses and (to some extent) capitals, supercarriers to shoot capitals and sov structures. Then titans will have their unique role: antisupercapital weapon.
And for the doomsdays the same: that little penalty 'no RR for the first two-three minutes of the cooldown'. That will give a tactial trait to them: there should be a suitable local situation on the battlefield for the doomsday to be a good choice, not just global circumstances like 'we gank and are safe' or 'we would be wrecks if we don't use them'.
I would be kinda glad to see the same stuff with the dreadnoughts' siege but it seems they're doomed to be crap while the siege is not active. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 .. 43 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |