Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Shepard Book
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
21
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:56:00 -
[1] - Quote
I believe we were told it could take up to a year for the graphics upgrade for Tessellation Tech. I would much rather see those features and Establishments than rocks bouncing off a ship. Please put resources there instead. I looked for the Tessellation Tech post asking for feedback to no avail. |
ElQuirko
Gravit Negotii Rogue Elements.
478
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:56:00 -
[2] - Quote
Shepard Book wrote:I believe were told it could take up to a year for the graphics upgrade for Tessellation Tech. I would much rather see those features and Establishments than rocks bouncing off a ship. Please put resources there instead. I looked for the Tessellation Tech post asking for feedback to no avail.
Or we could see rocks bouncing off ships.
If we distribute pictures of people, does that mean God can file copyright claims under SOPA? |
Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
485
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:58:00 -
[3] - Quote
Shepard Book wrote:I believe were told it could take up to a year for the graphics upgrade for Tessellation Tech. I would much rather see those features and Establishments than rocks bouncing off a ship. Please put resources there instead. I looked for the Tessellation Tech post asking for feedback to no avail.
A year of man hours, that's not the same thing.
There will never be any official gaming in EVE, as it is illegal to include in the US And EU. |
Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1222
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 19:00:00 -
[4] - Quote
Shepard Book wrote:I believe we were told it could take up to a year for the graphics upgrade for Tessellation Tech. I would much rather see those features and Establishments than rocks bouncing off a ship. Please put resources there instead. I looked for the Tessellation Tech post asking for feedback to no avail.
I hear that artists are supremely equipped to write server code?
C/D
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|
Shepard Book
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
21
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 19:02:00 -
[5] - Quote
Xython wrote:Shepard Book wrote:I believe were told it could take up to a year for the graphics upgrade for Tessellation Tech. I would much rather see those features and Establishments than rocks bouncing off a ship. Please put resources there instead. I looked for the Tessellation Tech post asking for feedback to no avail. A year of man hours, that's not the same thing. There will never be any official gaming in EVE, as it is illegal to include in the US And EU.
Being able to gamble ships and isk seems like a great idea to me still. I can't count how many hours of watching a ship spin while waiting for a fleet to form, ect
|
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
3564
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 19:03:00 -
[6] - Quote
Im sorry but WiS gameplay was thrown in the trashbin as you thought it would be.
Its not going to be a social 3d space aka 3d chat room.
|
Shepard Book
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
21
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 19:03:00 -
[7] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Shepard Book wrote:I believe we were told it could take up to a year for the graphics upgrade for Tessellation Tech. I would much rather see those features and Establishments than rocks bouncing off a ship. Please put resources there instead. I looked for the Tessellation Tech post asking for feedback to no avail. I hear that artists are supremely equipped to write server code? C/D -Liang
Good point. Id much rather see them finishing establishments though. I am guessing there maybe artwork yet to be done?
|
Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1223
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 19:06:00 -
[8] - Quote
Shepard Book wrote: Good point. Id much rather see them finishing establishments though. I am guessing there maybe artwork yet to be done?
And then we get into the kinds of artists and what brings the most bang for the player-buck. You don't want the feature, and I do.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|
Shepard Book
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
21
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 19:09:00 -
[9] - Quote
Nova Fox wrote:Im sorry but WiS gameplay was thrown in the trashbin as you thought it would be.
Its not going to be a social 3d space aka 3d chat room.
I'd like to think there is still hope. They are already bunny hoping over the idea to next phase they hinted to in 2011 according to the 2012 trailer and some presentation I can not remember which this year. Being able to board a station in the middle of nowhere to get loot only to be locked in. I can try at least... |
Shepard Book
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
21
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 19:10:00 -
[10] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Shepard Book wrote: Good point. Id much rather see them finishing establishments though. I am guessing there maybe artwork yet to be done?
And then we get into the kinds of artists and what brings the most bang for the player-buck. You don't want the feature, and I do. -Liang
fair enough, guess time will tell |
|
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
3568
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 19:16:00 -
[11] - Quote
either way the wis thread would be a bit more constructive to have this conversation in.
|
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
3568
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 19:19:00 -
[12] - Quote
Would you be happier if those where ships instead?
|
Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1223
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 19:19:00 -
[13] - Quote
Nova Fox wrote:either way the wis thread would be a bit more constructive to have this conversation in.
The WIS thread is a total waste of space. INTERNET SPACESHIPS MUTHA****AAAAAAAS!!!!
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|
Shepard Book
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
21
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 19:20:00 -
[14] - Quote
Nova Fox wrote:either way the wis thread would be a bit more constructive to have this conversation in.
I understand what your saying but I originally wanted to post in the Tessellation Tech feedback thread but could not find it. CCP tends to want more than a yes or no answer so trying to explain why I said no here. Thanks |
Nirnias Stirrum
Ore Mongers BricK sQuAD.
37
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 19:20:00 -
[15] - Quote
+1 for rocks bouncing off of ships! |
Shepard Book
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
21
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 19:23:00 -
[16] - Quote
Nirnias Stirrum wrote:+1 for rocks bouncing off of ships!
I am surprised you did not say Ore bouncing off ships Thanks for the feedback either way though.
|
Gevlin
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
120
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 19:23:00 -
[17] - Quote
WIS is making a plan I will let them follow it.
but I would like to see the POS dead horse delt with first. then we can start having graphixs fun
But it looks like there is an over whelming Positive response to the eye candy enough to warrent its inclusion.
this is the thread you should be voicing you opinions at: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=85762&find=unread I agree with several people: CCP needs to focus most of eve's recources on FIS, but the development of WIS still needs to continue, just as a slower and more efficient pace. In eve I wish to be more than just a machine. |
Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
960
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 19:23:00 -
[18] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Shepard Book wrote: Good point. Id much rather see them finishing establishments though. I am guessing there maybe artwork yet to be done?
And then we get into the kinds of artists and what brings the most bang for the player-buck. You don't want the feature, and I do. -Liang
Me too.
CQ's was sutch an important implementation but people can't see further than their nose. Now we have Dust players arriving from all over the world to interact with us, what better place thant the one behind "The Door" to do this?
Thing is that I don't want to play rogues in space, there are several other things to do. FPS is their stuff, orbital strikes is OUR stuff. |
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
3568
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 19:24:00 -
[19] - Quote
+1 for ships breaking apart when they collide.
|
DarthNefarius
Ssssansha'S Deathhead Einsatzgruppen
106
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 19:24:00 -
[20] - Quote
Nova Fox wrote:Im sorry but WiS gameplay was thrown in the trashbin as you thought it would be.
Its not going to be a social 3d space aka 3d chat room.
I thought WiS gameplay was thrown into the DUSTbin (514:) "In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move." - D. Adams |
|
Shepard Book
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
21
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 19:24:00 -
[21] - Quote
Gevlin wrote:WIS is making a plan I will let them follow it. but I would like to see the POS dead horse delt with first. then we can start having graphixs fun But it looks like there is an over whelming Positive response to the eye candy enough to warrent its inclusion. this is the thread you should be voicing you opinions at: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=85762&find=unread
I'd like to see walking in POSes too! I am sure wormhole people would love it as well.
|
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
496
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 19:26:00 -
[22] - Quote
Nirnias Stirrum wrote:+1 for rocks bouncing off of ships! +2 for said rocks damaging ships!
|
DarthNefarius
Ssssansha'S Deathhead Einsatzgruppen
106
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 19:27:00 -
[23] - Quote
Nova Fox wrote:+1 for ships breaking apart when they collide.
+1 for realistic ship bouncing off of shields ( or damaging them would be better )
+1 for WiS like this http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=jHJI8igcofI
"In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move." - D. Adams |
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
3568
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 19:29:00 -
[24] - Quote
+4 for revolving planets and stations and stars and things in geo sync orbit.
|
Altimo
Clan Hyena Axiom Solaris
11
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 19:34:00 -
[25] - Quote
I honestly think that this graphics feature the art team is thinking of would be more immersion into the game, It doesn't matter whether I'm pvping or pveing, Right now I have most of my sound turned down and the effects themselves are less than convincing.
I'm not so immersed in the events taking place, in the moment as much as I am just focused on getting tasks done.
The Art/sound team should definitely continue bringing us more immersed into the game environment. I been playing eve for a damn long time, and I say its about time they step it up a notch, bumping asteroids into my ship and having them bounce/shatter, at the same time hearing the crackling/seeing your shields light up as it happens. It's convincing.
EVE needs more of that. I am well aware of the other issues, such as ship balancing which should always come first, but remember this is the art teams job. Improving the look and feel is just as important imo.
|
Glockshna Quant
Versatility Production Corporation' LLC
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 19:35:00 -
[26] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Shepard Book wrote:I believe we were told it could take up to a year for the graphics upgrade for Tessellation Tech. I would much rather see those features and Establishments than rocks bouncing off a ship. Please put resources there instead. I looked for the Tessellation Tech post asking for feedback to no avail. I hear that artists are supremely equipped to write server code? C/D -Liang Yes because it takes NO coding to upgrade the entire engine to support dx11 from the current dx9 platform :rollseyes: |
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
496
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 19:37:00 -
[27] - Quote
Nova Fox wrote:+4 for revolving planets and stations and stars and things in geo sync orbit. I'll +5 on that G. Hellz yah.
...and it's feasible. It really is. I wouldn't have guessed we would see the day where space looked so good, the stars were in their respective and correct positions in space, and the gates pointed to their destination system. The game has come so far... I think anything is doable.
|
Altimo
Clan Hyena Axiom Solaris
11
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 19:41:00 -
[28] - Quote
Gogela wrote:Nova Fox wrote:+4 for revolving planets and stations and stars and things in geo sync orbit. I'll +5 on that G. Hellz yah. ...and it's feasible. It really is. I wouldn't have guessed we would see the day where space looked so good, the stars were in their respective and correct positions in space, and the gates pointed to their destination system. The game has come so far... I think anything is doable.
+6 |
Shepard Book
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
21
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 19:57:00 -
[29] - Quote
Maybe they could add a hijacking element to WIS too Seriously though, I believe establishments and the ideas around it (monocles aside) were solid as goals.
I think it is really needed for growth of membership for the long term future and big picture. It could have been rolled out better I think we all agree on. Too many people are used to having an avatar in other games and it is a hurdle for most our new players IMO. |
Danfen Fenix
Vita Aequitas Veritas The Paganism Alliance
33
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 20:41:00 -
[30] - Quote
Nova Fox wrote:+1 for ships breaking apart when they collide.
Ship ramming, greek style
Heck, even new modules, geared towards ramming other ships without damaging your own ? |
|
Adunh Slavy
Ammatar Trade Syndicate
450
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 20:54:00 -
[31] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote: I hear that artists are supremely equipped to write server code?
Custom, tailored track suits for hamsters. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |