|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Esmenet
|
Posted - 2008.10.09 14:20:00 -
[1]
Looking forward to this blobbing buff.
|
Esmenet
|
Posted - 2008.10.10 09:50:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Kerfira Edited by: Kerfira on 10/10/2008 09:33:51
Originally by: Murina .... with obviously no tackle (or they would have caught the gang)...
But the problem is, a nano'ed ship can just tap the MWD button and be out of web range in 2-3 seconds. That is faster than most other ships can lock! Once out of web range, they're out of scramble range too in 2 seconds more.
When you CAN'T effectively tackle, how can you catch people? You CAN'T, which is exactly why this unbalanced advantage has to be taken from nano-ships (and CCP seem to be realising this).
So no, I'm neither stupid nor deluded. I'm objectively evaluating the pro's and con's of the matter, and is finding nano'ing to be overpowered. If nothing else proves it, the sheer amount of nano'ed ships roaming around is a hard give-away.
YOU on the other hand is highly biased in favour of your I-Win button and will do anything to keep it!
Eh what are you using to tackle? battleships?
|
Esmenet
|
Posted - 2008.10.11 08:37:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Esmenet on 11/10/2008 08:38:10
Originally by: Kerfira Edited by: Kerfira on 11/10/2008 08:07:51
Originally by: Killer Rasta BRING HUGGIN,RAPIER HYENA TO THAT DEFENDER FLEET U NOOB AND U WILL WIN.NOOOOB
So you're considering it entirely balanced that a gang that is able to engage a nano-gang with any chance of winning have to bring about the same number of very specialised Minnie ships, AND on top of that people to do damage?
Lol you generally need to bring a gang tailored to fit your opponents regardless of if its nanos or something else. When you are a defender you know the fleet composition of your enemy and have every opportunity to do so. You will die just as horribly to a rr-BS gang with your noobblob of drakes and caracals.
The game is more fun if you need tacklers, ewar, tank, logistics and dps. Instead of the tank+spank strategy advocated on this forum.
|
Esmenet
|
Posted - 2008.10.14 22:04:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Tehyarec How damn hard can it be to realize it is NOT balanced. Not every gang can have the ideal mix of ships, especially in smaller gangs.
Indeed we should all fly the same ship to make sure everything is "fair". I suggest ibises.
|
Esmenet
|
Posted - 2008.10.14 22:04:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Tehyarec How damn hard can it be to realize it is NOT balanced. Not every gang can have the ideal mix of ships, especially in smaller gangs.
Indeed we should all fly the same ship to make sure everything is "fair". I suggest ibises.
|
Esmenet
|
Posted - 2008.10.14 22:04:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Tehyarec How damn hard can it be to realize it is NOT balanced. Not every gang can have the ideal mix of ships, especially in smaller gangs.
Indeed we should all fly the same ship to make sure everything is "fair". I suggest ibises.
|
Esmenet
|
Posted - 2008.10.15 06:38:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Tehyarec
Originally by: Esmenet Indeed we should all fly the same ship to make sure everything is "fair". I suggest ibises.
The point is nano gangs basically DON'T need a balanced gang, whereas non-nanos do. There's a difference there if you look hard enough.
LOL. I dont think you understand nanogangs.
|
Esmenet
|
Posted - 2008.10.15 06:38:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Tehyarec
Originally by: Esmenet Indeed we should all fly the same ship to make sure everything is "fair". I suggest ibises.
The point is nano gangs basically DON'T need a balanced gang, whereas non-nanos do. There's a difference there if you look hard enough.
LOL. I dont think you understand nanogangs.
|
Esmenet
|
Posted - 2008.10.15 06:38:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Tehyarec
Originally by: Esmenet Indeed we should all fly the same ship to make sure everything is "fair". I suggest ibises.
The point is nano gangs basically DON'T need a balanced gang, whereas non-nanos do. There's a difference there if you look hard enough.
LOL. I dont think you understand nanogangs.
|
Esmenet
|
Posted - 2008.10.15 14:01:00 -
[10]
Originally by: lebrata Edited by: lebrata on 15/10/2008 11:53:51
Originally by: lebrata Are you drunk?..have you heard of nuets?, a solo vaga has no chance to kill a solo BS with even a single nuet fitted, and any ship can just run away that is a stalemate. Not bad considering the nano is a purely offensive pvp fit and fitting a heavy nuet can be done on all PVE fits.
Originally by: Tehyarec Neuts? Only one? Vaga runs off.
Here is the real issue for you and the rest aint it pal.
You have spent all that time killing rats and living in a imaginary world where your a great pilot and uber ship killer, and having day dreams about your awesomeness. Then a vaga comes along and it bursts your little bubble by not sitting still like the rats do.
A RATTING ship forcing a pure PVP fitted ship like a vaga to disengage just by fitting a single nuet is a HUGE benefit to the ratting ship but you seem to think that its not enough...so what your mission running piece of crap should now be able to make PVP pilots stupid and sit still so you can shoot them as they do in your day dreams?.
The above attitude is your problem pal in a nut shell, your lazy, unimaginative (unless its a dream about how uber at pvp you think you are) and unwilling to improve yourself or modify your thinking.
You and ppl like you will be the downfall of eve.
Well said.
|
|
|
|
|