|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
DigitalCommunist
|
Posted - 2008.10.14 00:00:00 -
[1]
Rofl.
49 page thread didn't need to be locked just because you guys posted a dev blog (something you should've done first, btw). After all, the dev blog is basically "get stuffed".
Is there some new tangent for us to discuss in this shiny clean thread?
|
DigitalCommunist
|
Posted - 2008.10.14 00:03:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Saraah Leeown Great stuff, I play eve online, not "unsubscribed skill training online" Please make sure all RP etc is stopped on an unsubscribed account to thanks.
Bye bye deadwood
End yourself.
Preferably via: ingested bleach, starving tiger sharks, sex with madeline albright.
|
DigitalCommunist
|
Posted - 2008.10.14 00:05:00 -
[3]
Oh hey, you guys are going to stop OFFLINE RESEARCH POINT ACCUMULATION too, right?
Cause that one affects game balance far more. RIGHT?
Of course it wouldn't get you any extra revenue, but that's beside the point! We must balance~! and balance hard!
|
DigitalCommunist
|
Posted - 2008.10.14 00:07:00 -
[4]
Edited by: DigitalCommunist on 14/10/2008 00:07:37
Originally by: Avon Actually, he is right tbh. Why should people be able to gain RP, and thus ISK on accounts that they aren't paying for?
I was flaming him for the first reason, see my post above. I'm all for removing passive RP gain. To summarize my expoert position: FUK DIS AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
|
DigitalCommunist
|
Posted - 2008.10.14 00:15:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Avon
Originally by: DigitalCommunist Edited by: DigitalCommunist on 14/10/2008 00:07:37
Originally by: Avon Actually, he is right tbh. Why should people be able to gain RP, and thus ISK on accounts that they aren't paying for?
I was flaming him for the first reason, see my post above. I'm all for removing passive RP gain. To summarize my expoert position: FUK DIS AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Oh, fairy snuff.
Personally I am happy for inactive to mean exactly that. I just think CCP are doing a terrible job of selling it.
I'm secretly all for this (five years ago, and) because it no longer affects me but HOLY SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIT talk about trying to pull a fast one with balatant lies. Apparently they don't mind shafting thousands of players who aren't going to see this in 48 hours, but they pull the "we need three years to consider this gameplay change and its effect on the playerbase" card whenever they have tough decisions to make. They also justify a lot of stupid changes that make EVE softer for the sake of the casual players, but all this does is make skill training less casual, proving that casual players can suck it just as hard when there's money involved words words angeranger
|
DigitalCommunist
|
Posted - 2008.10.14 00:30:00 -
[6]
Oh Wrangler, ur so meta.
|
DigitalCommunist
|
Posted - 2008.10.14 01:04:00 -
[7]
From here. Scroll down.
That was the last time they tried this. It was pulled after the patch notes thread was carpet bombed. Anyone from CCP want to keep arguing this was an unintended bug? If your search wasn't so sloppy, I'd be able to find the post where CCP rationalizes this change for EVE China because they pay by the hour or some such.
|
|
|
|