Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Suddenly Boom
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.04.09 16:15:00 -
[1] - Quote
What's my best bet for ganking mackinkaws using destroyers in hi-sec? 2 players will do the ganking, i was thinking 2 destroyers but i'm not sure which desty will be best. |
Bernie Nator
Talocan Hive Talocan United
182
|
Posted - 2012.04.09 16:18:00 -
[2] - Quote
Suddenly Boom wrote:What's my best bet for ganking mackinkaws using destroyers in hi-sec? 2 players will do the ganking, i was thinking 2 destroyers but i'm not sure which desty will be best. The ones that have 8 guns. |
Suddenly Boom
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.04.09 16:21:00 -
[3] - Quote
Bernie Nator wrote:Suddenly Boom wrote:What's my best bet for ganking mackinkaws using destroyers in hi-sec? 2 players will do the ganking, i was thinking 2 destroyers but i'm not sure which desty will be best. The ones that have 8 guns.
That's only the catalyst, no chance that cormorant with EM missiles to take advantage of the low em resists would work better? |
The Crushah
Stimulus Rote Kapelle
16
|
Posted - 2012.04.09 16:23:00 -
[4] - Quote
2 Catalysts will do max damage. Fit something like this:
8x light neutron blaster I 2x Sebos 2x MFS, 1 TE
Fit CN antimatter, like 5 rounds per gun. No sense in wasting ammo. Put in a hobgob if you like, but I find trying to deploy drones is kinda a waste. The TE gives you a little better range in case you dont land perfectly at 0. |
Bernie Nator
Talocan Hive Talocan United
182
|
Posted - 2012.04.09 16:23:00 -
[5] - Quote
Suddenly Boom wrote:Bernie Nator wrote:Suddenly Boom wrote:What's my best bet for ganking mackinkaws using destroyers in hi-sec? 2 players will do the ganking, i was thinking 2 destroyers but i'm not sure which desty will be best. The ones that have 8 guns. That's only the catalyst, no chance that cormorant with EM missiles to take advantage of the low em resists would work better? Lemme rephrase that. The one with the 8 turret slots. |
Karl Planck
159
|
Posted - 2012.04.09 17:01:00 -
[6] - Quote
Bernie Nator wrote:Suddenly Boom wrote:Bernie Nator wrote:Suddenly Boom wrote:What's my best bet for ganking mackinkaws using destroyers in hi-sec? 2 players will do the ganking, i was thinking 2 destroyers but i'm not sure which desty will be best. The ones that have 8 guns. That's only the catalyst, no chance that cormorant with EM missiles to take advantage of the low em resists would work better? Lemme rephrase that. The one with the 8 turret slots.
coercer has 8 you turds
If you don't like it, you should go and ride your Emo high-horse all the way back to WoW.
|
Bernie Nator
Talocan Hive Talocan United
184
|
Posted - 2012.04.09 17:03:00 -
[7] - Quote
Karl Planck wrote:Bernie Nator wrote:Suddenly Boom wrote:Bernie Nator wrote:Suddenly Boom wrote:What's my best bet for ganking mackinkaws using destroyers in hi-sec? 2 players will do the ganking, i was thinking 2 destroyers but i'm not sure which desty will be best. The ones that have 8 guns. That's only the catalyst, no chance that cormorant with EM missiles to take advantage of the low em resists would work better? Lemme rephrase that. The one with the 8 turret slots. coercer has 8 you turds It's why I said 8 turret slots.
|
Griznatch
Xicron Syndicate Tus Network
94
|
Posted - 2012.04.09 18:59:00 -
[8] - Quote
2 catalysts GǦ 2 of anything else I used to have a clever sig but I lost it. |
Hallelujahchorus
Wrecketeers
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 02:15:00 -
[9] - Quote
Suddenly Boom wrote:What's my best bet for ganking mackinkaws using destroyers in hi-sec? 2 players will do the ganking, i was thinking 2 destroyers but i'm not sure which desty will be best. Oh, it's you again. Can I help?
|
Suddenly Boom
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 12:47:00 -
[10] - Quote
Hi again :D yeah possibly, first I need to get me a few well trained gank catalyst pilots set up, training some now but if i can buy from the character sale forum I will.
With 4 catalysts we could even take super tanked hulks with T1 blasters, or 3 catalysts with T2 |
|
Aqriue
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
525
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 16:35:00 -
[11] - Quote
Thank god for risk adversion pilots amirite ?
Couple of cheap destroyers fit for 5 million or less
To destroy a single ship worth a couple of hundred million in under 15 seconds.
Yeah, risk adversion by any other means be it flying in highsec is risk adversion. BTW, CONCORD is watching your back until you strike. No different then the guy in the barge, since CONCORD is unbiasedly watching both of you to knock down one of the parties should they become aggressive. Good thing those hulks and macks are poorly designed by intent, wouldn't want to see people even try and lose a lot of isk of their own but they still call themselves badass hardcore pilot since a barge sitting in an asteriod field blows up just as easily as a level 4 battleship flown by an NPC . |
Kazacy
BACKFIRE Squad S O L A R I S
16
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 18:03:00 -
[12] - Quote
Aqriue wrote:Thank god for risk adversion pilots amirite ? Couple of cheap destroyers fit for 5 million or less To destroy a single ship worth a couple of hundred million in under 15 seconds. Yeah, risk adversion by any other means be it flying in highsec is risk adversion. BTW, CONCORD is watching your back until you strike. No different then the guy in the barge, since CONCORD is unbiasedly watching both of you to knock down one of the parties should they become aggressive. Good thing those hulks and macks are poorly designed by intent, wouldn't want to see people even try and lose a lot of isk of their own but they still call themselves badass hardcore pilot since a barge sitting in an asteriod field blows up just as easily as a level 4 battleship flown by an NPC .
you recently lost an hulk?
|
JackStraw56
Run Like an Antelope Knights of Tomorrow
47
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 02:31:00 -
[13] - Quote
A single catalyst will be sufficient to gank any but the most buffer tanked mackinaws in lower security high sec. |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |