Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Kane Kuchera
Amarr NoD Imperium
|
Posted - 2008.12.22 23:27:00 -
[1]
Firstly, I would like to point to an already open thread in another location HERE
It has been discussed, complained about and been a problem in EvE for a very long time. That is of course server lag during large scale engagements.
Although this is a serious problem for countless players there are few solutions to the grand scale of the problem.
However, a suggestion has been discussed by a fair few people of a way to atleast improve the issue significantly to some degree.
Additional "server nodes" as I am told they are named can be assigned to areas where a fleet engagement is scheduled to go down.
If this can be done then I suggest a very simple solution.
Why does this not occur to FOUR systems on a permanent basis, one per faction.
Many fleet engagements between the Caldari & Gallente occur in OLD MAN STAR and TAMA. Both systems are directly adjacent to the relevant factions "high sec"
If more nodes where provided for these systems plus the Matari & Amarrian equivalents then we would finally have a location more suited for large scale PvP fleet action.
It may not solve the entire problem, however it does add a significant improvement to the situation and gives all four houses a location each in which they can martial full scale PvP at any time without crippled lag taking away their hard earned ISK needlessly.
Most people in Faction war and PvP in general have no discontent about loosing assets when it is under proper circumstances. Circumstances we pay for every two months. But to loose so much because of a server side failing? Then have not even having reimbursement I belive is unreasonable to any person in this game in any profession.
Please, add more nodes to one system per faction.
- Thankyou,
- Kane Kuchera ACHMED FLEET FTW! |
J Ryan
Under Heavy Fire
|
Posted - 2008.12.22 23:28:00 -
[2]
Much Support to this
|
Victor Dyb
|
Posted - 2008.12.22 23:30:00 -
[3]
I concur with Kane
|
Vega Bond
|
Posted - 2008.12.22 23:32:00 -
[4]
w0rd... this should be done
|
Usul Atreides
|
Posted - 2008.12.22 23:33:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Usul Atreides on 22/12/2008 23:32:56 Agree completely.
FW will suffer if this area is not improved - it is after all a more 'casual' style of play, and people will just 'casually' leave if this keeps happening.
|
Kane Kuchera
NoD Imperium
|
Posted - 2008.12.22 23:34:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Usul Atreides Edited by: Usul Atreides on 22/12/2008 23:32:56 Agree completely.
FW will suffer if this area is not improved - it is after all a more 'casual' style of play, and people will just 'casually' leave if this keeps happening.
FW has already sufferd alot because of this problem. This ma just bring the enthusiams back for alot of people. Certainly for me. ACHMED FLEET FTW! |
RUFiO 42
|
Posted - 2008.12.22 23:38:00 -
[7]
Full support, FW is suffering severely from this problem, and the fact that resonable solutions are being brought forward should not be ignored. Needless lag should not be ignored any longer.
|
Unondite
|
Posted - 2008.12.22 23:39:00 -
[8]
Completely Agree
|
Lord Noj
23rd Light Dragoons
|
Posted - 2008.12.22 23:41:00 -
[9]
I agree, I just hope it works. Right now FW is worthless.
|
kossyo
|
Posted - 2008.12.22 23:42:00 -
[10]
I fully support the idea.
|
|
grypher
|
Posted - 2008.12.22 23:44:00 -
[11]
I agree to.
|
XSIM
|
Posted - 2008.12.22 23:45:00 -
[12]
Would it hurt just to try it out, a trial even.
|
Chris Fierce
NoD Imperium
|
Posted - 2008.12.22 23:48:00 -
[13]
Please do something.... Anything.
|
masternerdguy
|
Posted - 2008.12.22 23:55:00 -
[14]
/signed , supported
|
moreta60
|
Posted - 2008.12.22 23:55:00 -
[15]
|
Garald X'ordian
Censured Mind
|
Posted - 2008.12.22 23:55:00 -
[16]
I fully support this!
|
Tank Spankit
|
Posted - 2008.12.22 23:56:00 -
[17]
thumbs up
|
moreta60
|
Posted - 2008.12.22 23:56:00 -
[18]
I totally agree!
|
Adyriana
|
Posted - 2008.12.22 23:58:00 -
[19]
i support this
|
L3 F3mm3
|
Posted - 2008.12.22 23:58:00 -
[20]
cmon CCP
|
|
Louis deGuerre
Gallente Public Funded War Targets
|
Posted - 2008.12.23 00:13:00 -
[21]
Not happy with "assigned" areas for major pvp in FW, but I've been in enough fleets that I am forced to support this. Anything is better than current situation.
|
Bill Door
|
Posted - 2008.12.23 01:04:00 -
[22]
Originally by: moreta60 I totally agree!
|
MOONDOG 901
Holsten Pills
|
Posted - 2008.12.23 01:36:00 -
[23]
Need more power Scotty
|
GalactiColossus
NoD Imperium
|
Posted - 2008.12.23 06:13:00 -
[24]
I support this idea, since it is a fact that all of us suffer for this problem one way or the other.
|
Sivard el'Girgal
|
Posted - 2008.12.23 06:16:00 -
[25]
I support this fully
Gismund le' Girgal
|
Kane Kuchera
Amarr NoD Imperium
|
Posted - 2008.12.23 18:09:00 -
[26]
24 + so far then =] ACHMED FLEET FTW! |
Xanath Fireheart
Under Heavy Fire
|
Posted - 2008.12.24 03:35:00 -
[27]
I'll add my support to this.
I was drawn to Faction Warfare by the grand trailers showing fleets of opposing ships knocking the stuffing out of each other. Now I didn't expect it to be quite as smooth, but unfortunately my experience of FW so far has been lagfest after lagfest for those of us who want to enjoy full scale fleet battles as opposed to small guerrilla operations. And after all the improvements to the server code and whatnot, I must say I'm bit disappointed as the lag I experienced seemed far worse than it was before.
So a few systems where we could go with the full knowledge that the servers are doing their damndest to keep it all flowing smoothly would be great addition to FW.
|
Naomi Knight
Imperial Academy
|
Posted - 2008.12.24 08:17:00 -
[28]
Well ccp should upgrade their server base, with the current player base it is far behind the needs.They said the software is rdy to handle those huge fights ,make the hardware part rdy too.
|
Venkul Mul
|
Posted - 2008.12.24 12:07:00 -
[29]
While the basic idea is reasonable, the problem is the number of dedicated nodes available for all EVE.
For all I know there are 2 or 3 mission hubs with a dedicate node, plus Jita. Probably another 2-3 nodes are dedicated to "programmed" fleet warfare between alliances.
That make 5-7 dedicated nodes with the top hardware to get the better performance.
Adding another 4 nodes mean at least a 50% increase in of the number of dedicated nodes. Nodes that will not be used to get the best performance for all EVE. So the question is if the cost in hardware used is worth the return.
There are daily fleet engagements in those systems? Or you want the upgrade so that it will be possible to get daily fleet engagements if the players were interested?
Stated that, 4 systems seem a reasonable quantity at least for a testing period, so supported.
|
sojiny
|
Posted - 2008.12.24 17:37:00 -
[30]
i 100% support this FW will die if something is not done.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |