Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 |
21. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Just make the Entosis Link a Command Link with all associated restrictions. No more trollceptors. Got to use T3s for that.
- by Abrazzar - at 2015.03.06 13:12:37
|
22. Question, is this legal/allowed? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
More wardecs incoming. But I guess this is what you were looking for, no?
- by Abrazzar - at 2015.03.05 17:46:09
|
23. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
SilentAsTheGrave wrote: I don't understand why the fitting requirements for this high slot link thing was not revealed in the dev blog. If it turns out it is not possible to fit on anything smaller than a cruiser, it would have saved about 50 p...
- by Abrazzar - at 2015.03.05 17:42:50
|
24. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
125 pages, 2 CSM posts. This shows how little your vote matters. If it had to be any more obvious.
- by Abrazzar - at 2015.03.05 16:33:04
|
25. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I wonder where the CSM stands in all of this. There's only a single post from them in this thread. Considering the significance of the matter, some representation may be appropriate?
- by Abrazzar - at 2015.03.04 14:55:05
|
26. A suggestion for hunting down the covert cloaky campers who do nothi... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
How can you hope to find covert cloaky campers when you can't even find the appropriate place to post this stuff?
- by Abrazzar - at 2015.03.03 21:11:13
|
27. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Any plans to replace the index grinding with something more creative?
- by Abrazzar - at 2015.03.03 18:52:35
|
28. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Looks like your system is getting flayed alive. Good going, CCP, you definitely know how to do it!
- by Abrazzar - at 2015.03.03 18:37:00
|
29. A idea on prioritizeing fixes. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Don't we have the Complaint Sorting Machine for that? We can even vote on the skins.
- by Abrazzar - at 2015.03.03 12:13:42
|
30. Laser ammo no damage info on crystals in item hanger :D - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Sobaan Tali wrote: I hear Drone UI, POS, and Sov have also been waiting patiently in line for quite a while. It's not a line, it's a M+¦bius Strip.
- by Abrazzar - at 2015.03.03 10:37:30
|
31. Mining Discussion - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Talking about mining?
- by Abrazzar - at 2015.03.02 21:06:46
|
32. An Unorthodox Fix to "Cruisers Online" - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Adrie Atticus wrote: FireFrenzy wrote: Baltec, more people use logi for more things then just pvp... Implement a mechanic which allows you to still have about 18 effective reps on a single target, that will cover any and all PvE activiti...
- by Abrazzar - at 2015.03.02 11:33:56
|
33. Undock confirmation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
How about a "Docking request denied, you are an enemy of the state." to take the undocking issue out of your hands?
- by Abrazzar - at 2015.03.01 21:03:32
|
34. The destruction of an ice mining corporation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Out of curiosity: How much bounty do you need to put on a, say, retriever pilot, to make it profitable to gank? How much for a Skiff? An Orca? A freighter?
- by Abrazzar - at 2015.03.01 20:27:43
|
35. Each rebalance seems to require a future rebalance - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Got to make sure your job does not become obsolete.
- by Abrazzar - at 2015.03.01 18:33:38
|
36. The destruction of an ice mining corporation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'd say you have to move systems.
- by Abrazzar - at 2015.02.28 16:09:08
|
37. Capital ShipsGäó: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Why just balance? Be radical! Re-inventing Capital Warfare
- by Abrazzar - at 2015.02.28 01:13:12
|
38. 2 weeks can't play - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'll check it out, give me a minute.
- by Abrazzar - at 2015.02.27 23:37:00
|
39. o7 skynet - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Should restrict capitals to fighting capitals and structures only while requiring sub-capital assistance to be able to do so.
- by Abrazzar - at 2015.02.26 21:29:02
|
40. Wich csm representative is for miners ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
You were talking about mining? Who supports this ?
- by Abrazzar - at 2015.02.25 19:13:08
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |