| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
1. Hive Ships - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
We don't need more things that can not be destroyed! Want to know more?
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2009.12.02 09:35:00
|
2. The ECM fix - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tom Hanks Except there is no reason for a target jammer to deactivate someones hardeners or shield booster or other modules. Its a game, so with that analogy there is really no reason to do anything really. It's all fi...
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2009.05.07 20:52:00
|
3. The ECM fix - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
A better idea is for ECM to randomly disable modules instead of lock. :P That way you are not out of the fight, but some of your modules might be. E.g. Falcon jams an Apocalypse, 3 hardners, 1 lar and 2 guns are disabled for 20 seconds. xD
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2009.05.06 10:56:00
|
4. New Bounty System - Bounty Hunters - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I like this idea aswell. Very good. I'll actually bring it with me if I get voted for CSM.
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2009.05.04 11:49:00
|
5. POS Overhaul. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Could just make Medium POS industrial, Large POS battle and Small POS logistic. OR Make just one size POS and make POS module x not work with POS module y. I have been thinking a lot about it but can't really get an easy answer for it. :P Supp...
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2006.09.17 11:21:00
|
6. POS Overhaul. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Remove the length of sovereignity, currently it takes 5 days for the system to register a new POS into the equation. A POS should take 24 hours to get into the system. When you online a POS, 24 hours for it to be registered. If there are no other...
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2006.09.15 15:09:00
|
7. POS Overhaul. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
More comments?
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2006.09.08 10:16:00
|
8. Give a good reason NOT to allow 0-km warps (eliminate need of Ins-BMs) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I see no good argument what so ever WHY not to implent a warp to 0 km option. "People will use it for griefing, empire war will be difficult for nubs, bla bla bla" CAREFACE! Already now everyone can have instas EVERYWHERE. So if people already ha...
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2006.09.06 20:56:00
|
9. POS Overhaul. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Say that Battle POS gave 4, Logistics 2 and Industrial 1 points. You as the invading alliance must have sovereignity else your Logistic POS wont work. That is why one would have to take a Battle POS. But I see your point about Industrial POS bein...
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2006.09.03 19:16:00
|
10. POS Overhaul. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Quote: Although the thing with holding it charged for 24 hours wont work.. it will make defenders too strong, as the attacker will need to control the system for 20 days 23/7, which is impossible to to timezones. Well you as the attacker ...
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2006.09.03 12:55:00
|
11. The answers to POS wars, blobbing, logoffs, instas and sovereignity. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Your way to decide who has sovereignity seems a bit complex, and I am not sure if its even possible to do under the games current mechanism. In a way your system would also favour the attacker, so the larger the defensive party is the easier it is...
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2006.09.03 09:17:00
|
12. POS Overhaul. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Manus Ghostface I like the direction your're taking, of divorcing production from sovereignity, but I think it needs to be even more extreme. Give me your opinion of this admirial. http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&t...
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2006.09.03 09:14:00
|
13. POS Overhaul. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Admiral IceBlock on 02/09/2006 18:20:46 Under current mechanism POS Warfare is BORING because you are forced to grind POS's. To change that I am proposing the following systems. a) Different kinds of POS Make 3 'specific' kinds o...
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2006.09.02 18:19:00
|
14. Local Chat/Scanner Discussion. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
For **** sake Maya cant you just shut your breadhole for one minute? Its a good idea. When you are in 0,0 you should not be visible unless you are talking, but I believe that numbers in local should stay the same. If you want to be able to see w...
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2006.06.08 21:08:00
|
15. why MWDs are bugged, and how to fix them - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
well, it should be changed, no ship should be totally immune to any other ship like it currently is... immune = dual mwd interceptor/cruiser "We brake for nobody"
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2004.09.23 05:36:00
|
16. why MWDs are bugged, and how to fix them - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
well, it should be changed, no ship should be totally immune to any other ship like it currently is... immune = dual mwd interceptor/cruiser "We brake for nobody"
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2004.09.23 05:36:00
|
17. CORP LOGO's - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Admiral IceBlock on 04/04/2004 22:15:12 We need more variations of images/shapes/colours... (i posted on the wrong forum, but Joshua gave me an idea i can EDIT in here instead) "We brake for nobody"
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2004.04.04 21:00:00
|
18. CCP: Request for official public kill board from CONCORD - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
it should not be offical!! "We brake for nobody"
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2004.03.15 13:43:00
|
19. Top 10 things I'd like to see in Shiva as a corporation - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I want a REAL division system in EVE. As a CEO and Director you could add Members in to different Division. Each division has its own Chat Room. StockMarket!! More Hangars, Corp Wallets and Roles. "We brake for nobody"
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2004.03.13 11:30:00
|
20. Much more customization in CORP LOGO CREATION - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
fix the colors "We brake for nobody"
- by Admiral IceBlock - at 2004.02.25 15:00:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |