| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
1. Concise questions - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Manifest Can we have separate graphics settings for the two totally different environments CQ/Incarna and Hanger/space? Why would this matter to you? You were prefer higher graphics in station and lower ones outside I ...
- by Akita T - at 2011.06.22 02:08:00
|
2. Character customization and portraits - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Makes complete sense, so obviously, will never happen, like many other things that would make sense and make everybody's life easier. For what it's worth, I fully support it. _ Make ISK || Build || React || 1k papercuts
- by Akita T - at 2011.06.07 05:48:00
|
3. Character creation & customization feedback - Round 3 - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
1. IMPORT/EXPORT code for quick load/save of configuration for later editing, or use in a second character for portrait swap purposes. 2. Some way to visualize the "position" of the sculpting settings (akin to how the selection boxes worked in...
- by Akita T - at 2011.01.11 17:37:00
|
4. CPP, You have done right by us! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Now if they'd only add the option of having the window borderless and also add an option to align the window automatically to a corner of some screen and I will love them even more. _ Beginner's ISK making guide | Manufacturer's helper | Al...
- by Akita T - at 2010.09.19 16:01:00
|
5. Max download rates from CCP - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
/facepalm You're not patching, you're redownloading the whole damn SiSi version client. Next time, try re-copying over the TQ version and enjoying a much smaller patch. http://games.chruker.dk/eve_online/server_status.php ( Linkage ) See what ve...
- by Akita T - at 2010.07.15 22:33:00
|
6. How do I test eve gate? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
test.evegate.com _ Beginner's ISK making guide | Manufacturer's helper | All about reacting _
- by Akita T - at 2010.05.24 01:23:00
|
7. Insurance changes working as intended on test? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Well, they either heard all the bickering and adapted, or they were already planning to do it all just didn't say a word. Just glad I was wrong about insurance changes being the ONLY change they might make, and seems like they ended up thinking ab...
- by Akita T - at 2010.03.30 19:25:00
|
8. Insurance changes working as intended on test? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: SpiderWebMayhem Originally by: Akita T Originally by: SpiderWebMayhem This is a fallacious argument. Also, remember the "If they keep adjusting insurance payouts down to build costs" part of it too. My ...
- by Akita T - at 2010.03.23 17:52:00
|
9. Insurance changes working as intended on test? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Akita T on 21/03/2010 07:31:21 Originally by: SpiderWebMayhem This is a fallacious argument. No, it's just a typo, or better said, a change of mind without proper/complete overhaul of the previous post section. The "5" in...
- by Akita T - at 2010.03.21 07:28:00
|
10. Insurance changes working as intended on test? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Right now, ships sell for barely a bit above 70% of platinum payout, and you can find deals that sell for below platinum payout (as much as 10 mil under, actually, in some isolated areas of the game). So, basically, PvPing in a platinum-insured ...
- by Akita T - at 2010.03.20 21:38:00
|
11. Insurance changes working as intended on test? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
On second thought... maybe it's all for the best. Think about it. First off, I always kinda' loathed mining. Before, I could tell people mining was boring and whatnot, but it was eventually a matter of taste. After the change, I could just tell p...
- by Akita T - at 2010.03.20 18:31:00
|
12. Insurance changes working as intended on test? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Malcanis We have the situation we do now because it is insanely easy and (in hi-sec and to a certain extent w-space) safe. All the mining "buffs" of the last 3 years have all been to the same effect: ENCOURAGING MACROS Yo...
- by Akita T - at 2010.03.18 12:24:00
|
13. Insurance changes working as intended on test? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Yeah, we've been in (c) for about 6 months now (mostly thanks to the Veldspar respawn rate buff, but several other factors before and even the most recent sov system change "helped" along). We had been over in (b) for a little over 2 years before ...
- by Akita T - at 2010.03.18 04:17:00
|
14. Insurance changes working as intended on test? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Akita T on 17/03/2010 10:14:59 Originally by: skotenok Originally by: Akita T They used to have NPC mineral buy orders at 50% of "baseprice". They have been all eliminated gradually many years ago. If they would be w...
- by Akita T - at 2010.03.17 10:13:00
|
15. Insurance changes working as intended on test? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
They used to have NPC mineral buy orders at 50% of "baseprice". They have been all eliminated gradually many years ago. If they would be willing to revert anything, they should revert the things they did more recently to break it all so badly inst...
- by Akita T - at 2010.03.17 08:17:00
|
16. Insurance changes working as intended on test? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Retail Therapy It's not possible that this would just roll right onto live server with a footnote and "btw, we're changing how nearly everything works..."??? Wanna' bet the only mention about it in patchnotes will be "c...
- by Akita T - at 2010.03.13 08:28:00
|
17. Insurance changes working as intended on test? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Akita T on 13/03/2010 07:50:33 Originally by: El'Niaga What makes you think prices will fall? Prices are set by supply and demand not by what the insurance pays out, if it was by insurance pay outs as some seem to claim then...
- by Akita T - at 2010.03.13 07:45:00
|
18. Insurance changes working as intended on test? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Akita T on 13/03/2010 06:09:22 Originally by: Aera Aiana Originally by: Akita T Right, because the guy on top of the mast screaming "iceberg" is just shouting that to feel important instead of, oh, I don't know, tryi...
- by Akita T - at 2010.03.13 06:06:00
|
19. Insurance changes working as intended on test? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Sciencegeek deathdealer /me points out that its the test server and a long ways away from release Right, because CCP ever improves something based on faulty premises, now do they ? Quote: ... then he covers his eyes...
- by Akita T - at 2010.03.13 04:43:00
|
20. Insurance changes working as intended on test? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Seriously, what the bloodly hell is THIS supposed to solve anyway ? Do you think it will solve suicide-ganking ? IT WON'T ! Do you think it will solve the highsec/lowsec/0.0 mining income issue ? IT WON'T ! In fact, it will make it even worse...
- by Akita T - at 2010.03.13 03:39:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |