Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 |
61. Announcement:Dev Blog: Long-Distance Travel Changes Inbound - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Nysandra Khashour wrote: God the tears in this thread are delicious. Guess what, if you're in an alliance of over 1000 people and own space, you don't have any business doing "logistics" to highsec at all. Sort your **** out in your own space. ...
- by Andski - at 2014.10.04 07:03:00
|
62. Announcement:Dev Blog: Long-Distance Travel Changes Inbound - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Lord Road wrote: it really was a nice one, however he's wrong IMO, and here's why: Mittani cried since last year for CCP to nerf N3's wrecking ball (which CFC didn't have the skill nor discipline to copy), and CCP did. They vaporized it with t...
- by Andski - at 2014.10.03 19:12:00
|
63. Small reason why NPC stations throughout null are a BAD IDEA - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nariya Kentaya wrote: Because little guys wont be able to use them. if they ar eplentiful enough the big guys will just use these invincible stations to store their fleets and assets, and project power from there, so now, instead of current mec...
- by Andski - at 2014.10.02 09:12:00
|
64. The Null Deal: A Statement from Sovereign Nullsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
i know that some of you may not understand these things but our CSM guys aren't stupid enough to violate the NDA because it's an actual binding agreement between them and CCP there are actual consequences for violating it and even if CCP doesn't ...
- by Andski - at 2014.10.02 09:11:00
|
65. Announcement:Dev Blog: Long-Distance Travel Changes Inbound - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
With these changes, the west is practically guaranteed to be held by us until either our organizational structure collapses or the servers die. But apparently it's ~goon tears top kek~
- by Andski - at 2014.10.01 19:03:00
|
66. Announcement:Dev Blog: Long-Distance Travel Changes Inbound - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Celldoom wrote: Honestly this feels really bad. "Jump fatigue"? machines don't get tired... go put a cinder block on your car's gas pedal with something set up to continually feed gasoline into it see how long it takes for your engine to ex...
- by Andski - at 2014.10.01 18:38:00
|
67. The Null Deal: A Statement from Sovereign Nullsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Strange Shadow wrote: Occupancy SOV just adds even more grind than current system. For SOV warfare, structure grind is replaced by rat grind (or whatever grind, to prove that you 'occupied' here). For both attacker and defender. All day long, ...
- by Andski - at 2014.10.01 02:58:00
|
68. The Null Deal: A Statement from Sovereign Nullsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Arsine Mayhem wrote: Andski wrote: did you know that 'goon' is a singular term and not a plural or collective term no, apparently not http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/goon it's the 1st definition, the one with the number 1 be...
- by Andski - at 2014.10.01 01:16:00
|
69. The Null Deal: A Statement from Sovereign Nullsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
did you know that 'goon' is a singular term and not a plural or collective term no, apparently not
- by Andski - at 2014.10.01 00:45:00
|
70. The Null Deal: A Statement from Sovereign Nullsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Arsine Mayhem wrote: Goon want their npc stations in every region so they have launch points. http://eveeditorial.wordpress.com/2014/09/29/the-voices-have-spoken-but-to-what-end/ who the **** are "goon"
- by Andski - at 2014.10.01 00:25:00
|
71. The Null Deal: A Statement from Sovereign Nullsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Speedkermit Damo wrote: Are you saying that there would be no requirement for the CFC to stay together if you get the sort of sov-system you are after? The CFC exists because the sov system requires huge fleets to attack and defend timers. A...
- by Andski - at 2014.09.30 20:16:00
|
72. The Null Deal: A Statement from Sovereign Nullsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Snot Shot wrote: Anywhoo......the Null " Back Room " Deal thatGÇÖs being promoted looks like a Trojan horse approach. "Just get it through the door and by the time they stop to really examine what its carrying it will be too late"... we wan...
- by Andski - at 2014.09.30 20:06:00
|
73. The Null Deal: A Statement from Sovereign Nullsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Carl Stonewall wrote: ughhhhhh wall of text So why would we (and PL) completely ruin our diplomatic credibility by conning most of nullsec into putting their names on a proposal that would be completely against their interests?
- by Andski - at 2014.09.30 08:02:00
|
74. The Null Deal: A Statement from Sovereign Nullsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I really didn't know that so many people just love the status quo
- by Andski - at 2014.09.30 04:35:00
|
75. The Null Deal: A Statement from Sovereign Nullsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ocih wrote: Andski wrote: Unless you honestly believe that rules of engagement were the deciding factor in the fact that two coalitions own basically all of nullsec NBSI isn't about the rules of engagement, it's about the rules of peac...
- by Andski - at 2014.09.30 04:17:00
|
76. The Null Deal: A Statement from Sovereign Nullsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Unless you honestly believe that rules of engagement were the deciding factor in the fact that two coalitions own basically all of nullsec
- by Andski - at 2014.09.30 02:42:00
|
77. The Null Deal: A Statement from Sovereign Nullsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ocih wrote: If it's working, why the petition? Because NBSI isn't the problem? This is like blaming the janitor for a company going bankrupt.
- by Andski - at 2014.09.30 02:37:00
|
78. The Null Deal: A Statement from Sovereign Nullsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ocih wrote: A lot of the vitriol is deserved. Most of us have been pulled through the forum ringer at one time or another. Me more than most. Between Ocih, Skydell, Ioci and Sisohiv I have had my foot in my mouth a few times and I've seen a lot...
- by Andski - at 2014.09.30 01:22:00
|
79. The Null Deal: A Statement from Sovereign Nullsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Gevlon Goblin wrote: This suggestion serves one purpose: to allow the current power holders to condense their large empires into small, unpenetrable fortresses (cynojam, lot of friendlies in fleet 1-2 jumps away) where they can rat in complete ...
- by Andski - at 2014.09.29 18:33:00
|
80. The Null Deal: A Statement from Sovereign Nullsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Veers Belvar wrote: So why not go to war with both of them? Literally nothing is stopping the CFC from deploying its supercapital fleet and looking for a major battle ala BR5. Perhaps when they openly proclaim that their raison d'etre is t...
- by Andski - at 2014.09.29 05:53:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |