Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 |
81. Tech 1 to Tech 2 Blueprint Thread - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Doesn't mean they should rip people off with stupid and unfair changes. Everyone knows the game is going to change. Change to the game - not the rules of the game except in exceptional circumstances. Just awarding people free stuff for no reason w...
- by Aralis - at 2006.11.23 15:05:00
|
82. Tech 1 to Tech 2 Blueprint Thread - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Indeed and more than time there was one.
- by Aralis - at 2006.11.20 11:47:00
|
83. Tech 1 to Tech 2 Blueprint Thread - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
When you've screwed up ignoring it just makes it worse.
- by Aralis - at 2006.11.20 11:34:00
|
84. Tech 1 to Tech 2 Blueprint Thread - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Invention isn't anti-monopoly. It's things moving forward. T2 will become cheaper and more common. They will make invention easier with time. Remember one day T2 will be standard and we'll be fighting over T3 research. CCP are more or less getting...
- by Aralis - at 2006.11.19 09:45:00
|
85. Tech 1 to Tech 2 Blueprint Thread - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Exactly right. Technical brilliance is not enough CCP. You need to care at least a bit about your customers.
- by Aralis - at 2006.11.18 08:59:00
|
86. Running Eve Fairly - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
5) I could list so many examples here. But take events. I'm not aware of a single event that has been run fairly. But the most extreme example has to be the Race. A race between players what fun! They are allowed to shoot at each other - well of c...
- by Aralis - at 2006.11.17 12:33:00
|
87. Running Eve Fairly - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Some other examples: The willpower nerf. This one puzzles me greatly. Not only did it shaft those with high willpower and suddenly give a freebie to those with high perception. But Perception was a more useful attribute before you did this. Far f...
- by Aralis - at 2006.11.17 12:32:00
|
88. Running Eve Fairly - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Fairness in Eve Technically Eve is a brilliant game and I need to get that in before I lay into the devs. It could be the most fantastic game ever. However sadly it is run extremely badly. So I'll try and explain both in theory and with practical...
- by Aralis - at 2006.11.17 12:32:00
|
89. Log In Traps - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Of course login traps are grotesquely unfair. And one of the ops suggestions or some of the other good ideas in this thread would fix it. However there is an assumption that CCP care about fairness - based on many other cases I think this unfounde...
- by Aralis - at 2006.11.16 12:19:00
|
90. Tech 1 to Tech 2 Blueprint Thread - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The main point is that the game has no rules. Rather than following the system - that they created - CCP just do random things with no logic. Those who accepted T1 bpos in the lottery knew what they were getting as did we all. And so did those wh...
- by Aralis - at 2006.11.16 01:45:00
|
91. BPO upgrades - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Aralis on 16/11/2006 01:39:57 CCP you've screwed us on the upgrades to BPOs. You need to give us answers. Fix things and start running the game honestly. Sorry if this wasn't clear. I am of course referring to Cargo expander 1 bpos...
- by Aralis - at 2006.11.16 01:35:00
|
92. Confirm/Deny: All T1 Expanded Cargohold BPOs are now T2 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Utterly ludicrous. Deal with it CCP!
- by Aralis - at 2006.11.14 12:00:00
|
93. Confirm/Deny: All T1 Expanded Cargohold BPOs are now T2 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Wake up CCP.
- by Aralis - at 2006.11.13 08:32:00
|
94. Confirm/Deny: All T1 Expanded Cargohold BPOs are now T2 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I take back my earlier restraint. This is an outrage now I've thought about it more. It is typical of the most serious flaw with Eve. They keep moving the goalposts - they treat players with contempt and I am pretty sick of it. People who accepte...
- by Aralis - at 2006.11.11 06:20:00
|
95. [Auction] Expanded Cargohold I BPO - in Sell Orders [original thread]
Gallente space for them.
- by Aralis - at 2006.11.11 00:24:00
|
96. Confirm/Deny: All T1 Expanded Cargohold BPOs are now T2 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The basic issue here is extremely dodgy but I bet plenty of people have commented on that. Two particular outrages remain: 1) No announcement - it just happened and people had to find out the hard way. 2) BPOs got upgraded and not BPCs. What h...
- by Aralis - at 2006.11.11 00:00:00
|
97. Gangs in Kali - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
Lot of nice stuff but some concerns. Wouldn't it be better for everyone - and save more stress on the servers if you: 1) Abolish the old style gangs altogether. 2) Let anyone form the new style gangs but only give the fancy features and bonuses t...
- by Aralis - at 2006.11.06 09:05:00
|
98. Caldari needs a nerf. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Actually while I'm on topic one extra thought. I don't generally have a problem with Amarrian ships. But the weakest ships in the game are Khanid. Having a ship use half it's high spots on missiles and half on guns isn't flexible. It's just gimpe...
- by Aralis - at 2006.11.03 12:26:00
|
99. Caldari needs a nerf. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I have made some comments re Amarrian ships - but that's largely because they are what I fly. I see the problem as largely Caldari. I rate the ships overall by race: Caldari>Gallente>Amarr>Minmatar with by far the biggest gap between Cald...
- by Aralis - at 2006.11.03 11:59:00
|
100. Caldari needs a nerf. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Aralis on 03/11/2006 12:01:00 I find it amazing that anyone doesn't consider Caldari overpowered. I'd just laugh at anyone denying it if it wasn't obvious from the changes planned in Kali that the devs agree! First to demolish some...
- by Aralis - at 2006.11.03 11:58:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |