Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
561. Stacking penalty on rigs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Well, I just tested it on the test server, it behaved exactly like I said in my first post. There might be a possibility that it is bugged on TQ atm or you made an error somewhere.
- by Aramendel - at 2007.01.18 12:18:00
|
562. Stacking penalty on rigs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Yes, but neither necessarily have not to conform to module stereotypes. It's just an assumption you made. Generally there are no warnings in eve for module setups. There is no little paper clip which tells you that this setups sucks
- by Aramendel - at 2007.01.18 11:55:00
|
563. Stacking penalty on rigs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Aramendel on 18/01/2007 11:48:04 Firstly, what you describe is *not* the stacking penality. It's simply the way how harderners - does not matter which kind - work. 2 55% harderners do not give you 110% resistance but 100 - (100 * 0...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.01.18 11:49:00
|
564. The tribble with nanos... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Aramendel on 18/01/2007 11:14:05 Originally by: Nev Clavain What you are asking for here, is that a ship - with the specific purpose of being fast, should be nerfed to the point that it can be caught by ships that are slow. ...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.01.18 11:16:00
|
565. The tribble with nanos... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: CharlieMurphy i have tackled nanophoons in a stiletto with an afterburner on it and 3 light nos in the highs he drained my cap in 1 cycle of his mighty e500s (12 second cycle time) and then my small knaves sucked back enoug...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.01.18 01:43:00
|
566. The tribble with nanos... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Nev Clavain Nosdomi could do it I'm pretty sure with a hefty tank, or any Nos battleship. You kinda answered yourself, they would simply kill it's drones. And/or outnos it, which isn't too unlikely. In short, basically t...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.01.18 00:37:00
|
567. The tribble with nanos... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Nev Clavain The complexity of the counter is proportional to the pricetag of the ship. Exept this is exactly not the case. As said, the effect/isk ratio of nanoBS is far far FAR above anything else. Please do any non-nan...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.01.17 22:34:00
|
568. The tribble with nanos... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Aramendel on 17/01/2007 21:17:05 Originally by: Nev Clavain You are the one that has problems killing a paper thin battleship just cos it goes quite fast... not me. I did say where? Ah, yes, assumptions again. Quot...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.01.17 21:19:00
|
569. The tribble with nanos... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Aramendel on 17/01/2007 20:51:31 Originally by: Nev Clavain How can you say that a nanoship doesnt have a reduce in dps? Large guns are just not an option on a ship moving that fast - therefore reduced DPS. Yes, because ...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.01.17 20:54:00
|
570. The tribble with nanos... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: James Snowscoran The problem is that there isn't a stacking penalty to fitting them. Fast battleships aren't really a problem, but agile battleships makes it unbalanced. I tend to agree. Flagging the -inertia stat would...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.01.17 19:59:00
|
571. The tribble with nanos... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Aramendel on 17/01/2007 17:16:38 Originally by: Nev Clavain So I see what you are saying, everything should be the same. Yes That would be great. No, I am saying that everything should be balanced. Which does not mean ev...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.01.17 17:16:00
|
572. The tribble with nanos... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Nev Clavain It has no tank and a crow can beat its shield regen. While it has absoltuely nothing to hit back at a crow doing that speed. Its only option is to head for a gate or station. Now if the gate happens to be covered...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.01.17 16:23:00
|
573. The tribble with nanos... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Nev Clavain Lol so your 300 mill setup you propose, (notice no hugely expesnive faction nos) can be countered by a crow setup worth under 100 mill, as I have already described. The problem is what?? A domi WD costs 150 m...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.01.17 15:55:00
|
574. The tribble with nanos... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Jim McGregor Sure, but 5k/sec is with implants.[/b] 8 km/sec is with (snake) implants. 5k/sec is with a relatively cheap faction MWD and 3 vent rigs. Quote: Because I get the impression that everything that cant be k...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.01.17 15:47:00
|
575. The tribble with nanos... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Nev Clavain Your point about faction NOS, while true, shows what is wrong with your attitude: you are focused on thinking why you can't kill a nanoBS, instead of how you can do it. The point is that whatever you do you n...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.01.17 15:34:00
|
576. The tribble with nanos... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Why would anyone even pick amarr when they are about tanking, if tanking is not allowed to make a difference in combat? Why would anyone even pick gallente when they are about damage, if damage is not allowed to make a difference in combat? Why ...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.01.17 15:28:00
|
577. The tribble with nanos... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Aramendel on 17/01/2007 15:19:39 Originally by: Nev Clavain A hugely specialised ship and pilot in their specific role OUGHT to be good at what they do. What is wrong with that. What kills a nanoship also kills a normal ...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.01.17 15:22:00
|
578. scrapheap challange forums - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I think calmdown and sarmaul just wanted some time off to play Burning Crusade.
- by Aramendel - at 2007.01.17 12:48:00
|
579. Rofl Lookat the server pop - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Plutoinum WOW is like a job. QFT. It's really a good game, but the endgame grind sucks big time.
- by Aramendel - at 2007.01.17 12:46:00
|
580. The tribble with nanos... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Sebmagic You don't need inertia much in space... so it shouldn't be much of an issue anyways.... Inertia is THE main force in space which is limiting movement. Originally by: Alain Deloen it's the matari way. ot...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.01.17 10:49:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |