Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 30 40 |
141. Monthly (major) nag : how would YOU protect a freighter from suiciders - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Aramendel on 23/07/2007 18:42:14 Originally by: Akita T The "obvious" methods exist, indeed... namely: * only hauling small loads per ship compared to ship value vs "toughness", that's usually a no-go for suicide gankers * ...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.07.23 18:37:00
|
142. Monthly (major) nag : how would YOU protect a freighter from suiciders - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
No offense, Akita T, but this is a rather redundant topic. Freighter ganks are avoidable. Period. If you remove ALL ways how it could be avoided then rather OBVIOUSLY it cannot. You might as well condense everything you've written to one single ...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.07.23 17:55:00
|
143. Weekly nag : chance-based mechanics don't really belong in EVE - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
*grr* stupid post limit, I only needed one more paragraph. Quote: The point, as I was saying in the OP, is not HOW you should change things. I was not going to go into the details of possible implementations of the changes just BECAUSE that...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.07.23 10:05:00
|
144. Weekly nag : chance-based mechanics don't really belong in EVE - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Akita T So, basically, missile boats with dampners and/or NOS are boring, whereas a jamming turret ship is not... according to your statement. Furthermore, CHESS would be the epitome of boredom then... or for that matter any...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.07.23 09:57:00
|
145. Weekly nag : chance-based mechanics don't really belong in EVE - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Banana Torres Originally by: Akita T HOW ? Simple. Instead of a "chance to jam", simply adjust the jam TIME per jammer cycle. Yeah, so now the ECM ships will fit Sensor Dampers so that the locking time of their ta...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.07.22 21:00:00
|
146. So, how do I recover from -5 standing to Amarr empire? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nope, they removed that recently. As was said already, his options are - doing missions for caldari, khanid or ammatar. Sisters of eve might work, too. - forming a gang with someone with good standings and running amarr missions together (especia...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.07.22 09:47:00
|
147. Whine/petition/poll of the day : re-enable MWDs in deadspaces - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Akita T Wether you tanke them via range, via insane shield recharge or whatnot... does it really, REALLY matter ? Yes. Shield and armortanks have finite amounts of damage they can tank. You have a certain maximum and if...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.07.18 21:47:00
|
148. Whine/petition/poll of the day : re-enable MWDs in deadspaces - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Exept that you can do it not only in lvl 4s. Using a t1 frig with a MWD to tank 10/10s or lvl5s would be slightly broken.
- by Aramendel - at 2007.07.18 15:19:00
|
149. Whine/petition/poll of the day : re-enable MWDs in deadspaces - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
AFAIK the reason for not allowing MWDs is because you could speed/rangetank the NPCs too easily.
- by Aramendel - at 2007.07.18 15:09:00
|
150. Ideas for balancing Caldari PVE and missiles - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Cassana Daystar My alt is a Matar pilot with good gunnery skills and pre-rev he was able to snipe to 250kms with his Tempest, using 1400mm's and Tremor. The nerf means that he is now in the extreme part of his falloff at tha...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.07.16 21:27:00
|
151. Thermodynamic's Reduce to Energy Management 4 please! (First Whine) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
If your ship is capstable without it its effect is pretty much nonexistant for you. It makes you in theory more nosresistant, but it only has a real effect on capitals. It *is* nice to have, but I would class it in usefulness below lvl 5 in a shi...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.07.16 17:53:00
|
152. Thermodynamic's Reduce to Energy Management 4 please! (First Whine) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Plave Okice All those who started whining in this thread could have had this trained by now. I started training EM5 as soon as soon as I saw the changed requirements on sisi, have it now since around 2 week and am stil...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.07.15 11:16:00
|
153. Ideas for balancing Caldari PVE and missiles - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Aramendel on 14/07/2007 17:23:50 Quote: Again, false. I never said I couldn't figure out your fitting - I asked YOU to provide it to us. The burden of proof is on the poster, not the reader. Simple forum rules. If you have...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.07.14 17:24:00
|
154. Ideas for balancing Caldari PVE and missiles - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Aramendel on 14/07/2007 17:23:37 Originally by: Riven Starkill You jumped on me because I disagreed with you. Hardly. Compare how I discuss with Tovarishch and with you. It was actually rather civil till you entered this...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.07.14 17:20:00
|
155. Ideas for balancing Caldari PVE and missiles - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tovarishch I've already mentioned that I agree with you that range and DPS must, to some degree, be mutually exclusive. I simply believe that your proposal is far too heavy handed in reducing missile damage. It would be ...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.07.14 09:10:00
|
156. Ideas for balancing Caldari PVE and missiles - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tovarishch but not to the entire negation of damage. Wrecking hits alone provide much higher than 0 DPS. Yes. But they are not enough to make any real difference in most cases. And the speed limits where you won't get ...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.07.13 11:36:00
|
157. Ideas for balancing Caldari PVE and missiles - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Aramendel on 12/07/2007 16:13:07 Quote: You provide scant to no data û including how exactly that raven and mega are fitted û and you throw out numbers to justify a nerf to missiles. I assume that people have a basic under...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.07.12 16:11:00
|
158. Ideas for balancing Caldari PVE and missiles - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Riven Starkill Simply put, you are wrong. First û I never said speed didnÆt affect guns. I said that ONLY missiles are COMPLETELY defeated by speed. And I said that guns get defeated by speed as well. At smaller maximum ...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.07.12 15:54:00
|
159. Ideas for balancing Caldari PVE and missiles - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Aramendel on 12/07/2007 16:11:55 Originally by: Riven Starkill Simply put, you are wrong. First û I never said speed didnÆt affect guns. I said that ONLY missiles are COMPLETELY defeated by speed. And I said that guns ge...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.07.12 15:54:00
|
160. Ideas for balancing Caldari PVE and missiles - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Aramendel on 12/07/2007 11:48:42 Originally by: Riven Starkill Yes, yes, heavy guns cannot track fast targets û but EVERY kind of missile in the game can be defeated by speed. And EVERY gun is as well. Even inties whi...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.07.12 11:44:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 30 40 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |