Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
1. Can we get rid of CSM after the recent PLEX insider trading fiasco? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Girka Kring wrote: Recently PLEX prices went up by 20%. And PLEX volume didn't change at all from the normal pattern until the day the announcement was made. That tells us the pressure on PLEX prices doesn't come from demand (from someone ...
- by Arrendis - at 2017.03.17 16:18:35
|
2. Thank you, CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Following on the popularity of the Gallente FatBee SKINs by Interbus, we here are Goonswarm would like to thank CCP for the new Minmatar FatBee SKINs released under the 'Valklear Glory' series. Now we just need Caldari Black/Yellow, and Amarr Bla...
- by Arrendis - at 2015.09.01 19:35:23
|
3. Increase Null sec conflict. Reverse risk vs reward. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
admiral root wrote: Mr Mieyli wrote: admiral root wrote: If everyone in highsec is earning less then sellers who want to continue to sell in highsec have two options: 1) reduce prices and continue to move product or 2) leave the prices up...
- by Arrendis - at 2015.08.30 05:08:17
|
4. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
KeeperRus wrote: I wonder how exactly this will change anything. CCP can not detect the software, so how will CCP know if it's being used? Exactly. Pretty damned easily: do the accounts receive the same command from the same IP at the same t...
- by Arrendis - at 2014.11.25 18:28:25
|
5. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Falcon wrote: Examples of allowed Input Broadcasting and Input Multiplexing are actions taken that do not have an impact on the EVE universe and are carried out for convenience: GÇóEVE Online client settings GÇóWindow positions and arran...
- by Arrendis - at 2014.11.25 17:01:43
|
6. The Null Deal: A Statement from Sovereign Nullsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
3 of 5 stars, needs more tildes.
- by Arrendis - at 2014.09.28 21:39:00
|
7. Announcement:CCP Response Regarding SOMER Blink Concerns - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Andski wrote: let's continue this game of making absurd conclusions from eula snippets Oooh! I got one. It's recycled from something I pointed out on TMC, but I think it still qualifies! The EULA says you can't have an EVE account if you're...
- by Arrendis - at 2014.08.21 07:51:00
|
8. Announcement:CCP Response Regarding SOMER Blink Concerns - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Trisha Landers wrote: CCP should ban corps that restrict membership based on nationality. It costs money to become a citizen of another nation just to be allowed to join a corp. You don't join SA in order to join Goons. That will likely get yo...
- by Arrendis - at 2014.08.21 07:44:00
|
9. Announcement:CCP Response Regarding SOMER Blink Concerns - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ohkewl wrote: Also rather funny to see all the hate here towards Somer from all the guys that paid $10 to get into a corp with a 120% SRP program. As a matter of fact, joining SA in order to get into Waffe or CONDI is one of the best ways to...
- by Arrendis - at 2014.08.21 07:41:00
|
10. Announcement:CCP Response Regarding SOMER Blink Concerns - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dutow Sa wrote: Deka Ekato wrote: CCP, - Can you please clarify that one of the reasons that Somer was punnished for was for RMT? - What about CCP's involement in all of this? I just feel that punnishing Somer is simply a start to fixi...
- by Arrendis - at 2014.08.20 22:37:00
|
11. Announcement:CCP Response Regarding SOMER Blink Concerns - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Brahan Seer wrote: Even if thats okay the EULA clearly states you cant have a character or play eve for business purposes. That can't get any clearer which makes all those groups guilty of breaking the EULA. Do you not agree with that premise? ...
- by Arrendis - at 2014.08.20 21:13:00
|
12. Announcement:CCP Response Regarding SOMER Blink Concerns - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
dexington wrote: Hendrick Tallardar wrote: Except that in the case of Zkillboard, Dotlan, CZ, TMC etc. there is no in-game reward for using their referral links. They aren't providing any incentive other than "help us keep this running and t...
- by Arrendis - at 2014.08.20 20:54:00
|
13. Announcement:Community Concerns Regarding SOMERblink - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edward Harris wrote: Hendrick Tallardar wrote: Welcome to any company in the world that provides a service. They can change their policies at anytime goons want and for any reason, your EULA/TOS agreement affirms you understand that. The as...
- by Arrendis - at 2014.08.20 18:12:00
|
14. Announcement:Community Concerns Regarding SOMERblink - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sniper Smith wrote: Tell me what's gonna happen to Lisa? They almost certainly will not. Any HR department worth its salt will laugh at you if you tell them you want them to reveal internal disciplinary action. In fact, doing so can (it does...
- by Arrendis - at 2014.08.20 16:48:00
|
15. Announcement:Community Concerns Regarding SOMERblink - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Garai Nolen wrote: Does the EULA exist as an abstract codified set of law that MUST BE ENFORCED just for the sake of enforcing it? NO. The EULA exists to allow CCP to do what they need to in order to PRESERVE THE INTEGRITY OF THE GAME. The inte...
- by Arrendis - at 2014.08.20 16:41:00
|
16. Announcement:Community Concerns Regarding SOMERblink - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ynef wrote: So after Somer Blink done with the reinbursment, they shall get the well deserved permanent ban for RMT and the reputation damage they done to CCP right? Last I checked, reputation damaging isn't a bannable offense. But let's ho...
- by Arrendis - at 2014.08.20 11:17:00
|
17. Announcement:Community Concerns Regarding SOMERblink - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Josef Djugashvilis wrote: I like the fact that SOMERblink tried to get around any problems by the use of 'clever' wording. Did they get a lawyer to devise the wording for them? Mittens perhaps? The above is a joke by the way. I didn't see...
- by Arrendis - at 2014.08.20 10:58:00
|
18. Announcement:Community Concerns Regarding SOMERblink - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
casperlolz wrote: I want to say this yes I agree both sides are right, but why now, I remember a news post from CCP themselves in 2012 Why now? Because Blink got caught RMTing a year after that news post (ie: last year) and got told to knoc...
- by Arrendis - at 2014.08.20 10:43:00
|
19. Announcement:Community Concerns Regarding SOMERblink - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Myriad Blaze wrote: Maybe it's just me, but I think this is most obvious and both sides - CCP and Somer - should have avoided leaving this open. Unless, of course, Somer wanted it open so as to justify the RMT framework.
- by Arrendis - at 2014.08.20 10:23:00
|
20. Announcement:Community Concerns Regarding SOMERblink - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Brahan Seer wrote: I just think banning somer having blink be dead does more harm to more people than good. Yes somer closed blink not CCP I get that but the two are related obviously. Establishing the consistent precedent that the rules wil...
- by Arrendis - at 2014.08.20 10:19:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |