Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
61. WYVERN SUPERCAP FOR SALE - Auction - in Sell Orders [original thread]
Tuesday bump.
- by Bagehi - at 2014.01.07 17:15:00
|
62. WYVERN SUPERCAP FOR SALE - Auction - in Sell Orders [original thread]
Saturday bump.
- by Bagehi - at 2014.01.04 19:05:00
|
63. WYVERN SUPERCAP FOR SALE - Auction - in Sell Orders [original thread]
Friday Bump!
- by Bagehi - at 2014.01.04 00:35:00
|
64. WYVERN SUPERCAP FOR SALE - Auction - in Sell Orders [original thread]
Start 20B Ends January 12, 2014 at 23:00 game time. Ole Bessie has had a long and eventful life. She was laid down sometime near the end of 2009. MisterGrinch used it for around a year before selling it off. Greyson Wolfe purchased it on 2010...
- by Bagehi - at 2014.01.03 04:10:00
|
65. eWarp or how to get tied up and gangraped - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Crosi Wesdo wrote: Bob FromMarketing wrote: how are you tacklable? you can't be bubbled, pointed, scrammed or webbed? EXPLAIN MORE PLEASE, USE WORDS AND FORM SENTENCES You cant interdicted when you log out. But when you log back in, if so...
- by Bagehi - at 2013.11.28 03:10:00
|
66. Sticky:[Beyond Rubicon] What Mobile Structures would you like to see? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Steve Ronuken wrote: Bagehi wrote: A cyno structure. Something with reasonable HP, unlike a noob ship or recon. No sov restrictions. Shows up on overview like a cyno. Eats fuel over time like a ship-based cyno. Is reasonably priced. Basicall...
- by Bagehi - at 2013.11.13 19:11:00
|
67. Sticky:[Beyond Rubicon] What Mobile Structures would you like to see? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
A cyno structure. Something with reasonable HP, unlike a noob ship or recon. No sov restrictions. Shows up on overview like a cyno. Eats fuel over time like a ship-based cyno. Is reasonably priced. Basically, something that allows alliance/coaliti...
- by Bagehi - at 2013.11.13 17:02:00
|
68. Sticky:[Rubicon] Command Ship Models - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Sleipnir http://imgur.com/a/NoFHa#hpYJ8fB looks a lot like... Hurricane Fleet Issue http://i.imgur.com/SRKK9rSh.png I mean, I'm not fond of the "space camo" to begin with, but at least the previous Sleipnir at least had dark grey camo.
- by Bagehi - at 2013.10.02 18:01:00
|
69. Sticky:[Rubicon] Warp Speed and Acceleration - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Kismeteer wrote: How painful is it going to be to fit a cyno to an inty? Because I found a new favorite cyno ship. claw - Bubble immunity, 2 wcs, 4k mwd speed, 2.8 align, 30m sig, enough for one light with current cargohold at cyno 4. Tackl...
- by Bagehi - at 2013.10.02 17:34:00
|
70. Sticky:[Rubicon] Interceptors - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Lock range. Interceptors need more of it.
- by Bagehi - at 2013.10.02 17:07:00
|
71. Sticky:[Rubicon] Sisters of EVE faction ships - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
What is this madness? Tanked, cloaky, drone boats? SOE don't have enough agents to handle the demand for these ships.
- by Bagehi - at 2013.10.02 16:34:00
|
72. Sticky:[Rubicon] Electronic Attack Ships - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Keres is going to be scary.
- by Bagehi - at 2013.10.02 16:31:00
|
73. The CSM Has Run Its Course - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
I was under the impression the CSM is a sounding board for portions of CCP. I'm under the impression many CSM have the goal of "don't let bad things happen to Eve" more than trying to push CCP to do new things they want. That's just my impression.
- by Bagehi - at 2013.10.01 16:26:00
|
74. Sticky:Terms of Service CSM Feedback Thread - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Dirk Action wrote: Mike Azariah wrote: iii) I chat with a guy who says he is Mynnnas alt . . . I contact Mynnna to see if it is on the up and up (it isn't) BUT Mynnna thinks it would be hilarious to see me fall for a scam and tells me yes, t...
- by Bagehi - at 2013.09.14 14:18:00
|
75. Sticky:Terms of Service CSM Feedback Thread - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Isis Dea wrote: Ali Aras wrote: Andski wrote: Actually, I'm going to retract my bit about alts. Claiming to be somebody else's alt should not be allowed. Imagine somebody going around claiming to be you and saying "Did I ever tell you...
- by Bagehi - at 2013.09.13 22:11:00
|
76. Sticky:Terms of Service CSM Feedback Thread - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Ifly Uwalk wrote: Quote: story This got petitioned and I was asked to not represent myself as "CONCORD-approved" as that might imply some sort of CCP approval or favouritism on CCP's part towards me; or as having been sicced on their a$$es...
- by Bagehi - at 2013.09.13 22:08:00
|
77. Sticky:Terms of Service CSM Feedback Thread - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Poetic Stanziel wrote: All EVEloedpia pages that represent player-owned entities (characters, corporations, alliances, coalitions, blogs, podcasts, third-party websites) should be removed immediately. EVElopedia should simply be a resource for ...
- by Bagehi - at 2013.09.13 22:02:00
|
78. Sticky:Terms of Service CSM Feedback Thread - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
mynnna wrote: My personal feeling on what such a revision should look like is as follows. Expand section 2B of the naming policy to include player names and names of player organizations. Change the relevant sections of the EULA & TOS ...
- by Bagehi - at 2013.09.13 21:54:00
|
79. Sticky:GM clarification on rewording of the Terms of Service - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
GM Karidor wrote: Just popping into here quickly to ask some patience in this matter and to please hold your horses, at least until tomorrow. We are currently in the process of writing something up that will (hopefully) give you some better ins...
- by Bagehi - at 2013.09.11 01:46:00
|
80. Sticky:GM clarification on rewording of the Terms of Service - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Not to be a complete wang, but wouldn't the new terms of service mean the NCdot is in the running for GM loving? I mean, they made the alliance name explicitly the same as the Northern Coalition many moons ago. While we're on this track, wouldn't ...
- by Bagehi - at 2013.09.10 22:16:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |