Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
1. Proposal:allow rigor catalyst rigs to work on all missiles - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Although rockets were buffed late last year, heavy assault missiles, torpedos and citadel torpedos are still very bad against targets that are smaller than them. All other weapon systems have no problem doing high damage to smaller craft if they c...
- by Bomberlocks - at 2011.11.14 19:26:00
|
2. Ship Balancing: Dramiel! (and Logistics) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CCP tallest, you are now officially on my good list, along with team BFF and team Gridlock (as opposed to all the monkeys who came up with Incarna and PI, who are on my sh*tlist). CCP tallest, you guys really, REALLY need to have a permanent bal...
- by Bomberlocks - at 2011.06.12 21:23:00
|
3. Balancing - Identifying problems - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Does Nozh even work at CCP anymore? I thought he'd left.
- by Bomberlocks - at 2011.04.25 00:49:00
|
4. Fixing FW: The discussion - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Bumping this before the feedback gets added to Cearain's FW thread in the AH.
- by Bomberlocks - at 2011.04.25 00:46:00
|
5. Fixing FW: The discussion - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
@Veshta: Liked your original thread, BUT, it's much too complex a change to wish for. It is on the level of the Dominion Sov changes for nullsec. I like the idea of border zones and improved NPCs along the lines of Sleeper or Sansha NPCs, though. ...
- by Bomberlocks - at 2011.04.18 19:26:00
|
6. Fixing FW: The discussion - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Since one of the topics that the current CSM hope to discuss at the summit this summer will be the state of FW, there is a need of what exactly needs to get fixed in FW. Apparently the CSM has had no concrete suggestions on what is exactly broken ...
- by Bomberlocks - at 2011.04.17 13:58:00
|
7. Drakes - Do they need a nerf? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Liang Nuren Originally by: Meeko Atari Just Face it, The Dev said it himself... They do not want Caldari ships to participate in PVP Train a Zealot like the rest of EVE. The devs are engaging us in a dialog and...
- by Bomberlocks - at 2010.10.22 22:23:00
|
8. Drakes - Do they need a nerf? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Would a decent counter to Drakes not be the Ferox? With two TCs, two SeBos and 3 mag stabs a rail Ferox can hit at over 126 kms with Spike. Granted, the DPS is anemic, but enough of them should be able to counter the Drakes with impunity.
- by Bomberlocks - at 2010.10.22 17:40:00
|
9. Dear CCP please fix stuff for the love of god!!!!!!!!!!!! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CCP doesn't care. As long as player numbers stay stable or grow as the game currently is, complaining to CCP is like asking Hizbollah to convert to Judaism.
- by Bomberlocks - at 2010.07.08 07:25:00
|
10. Tier 2 Destroyers - my thoughts - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I like these too. Very well thought out basics. To be honest, these would also make an ideal base for T2 destroyers, i.e. the same basics as the OP noted, but with higher resists. The Amarr one is going to make you some enemies though, I can say ...
- by Bomberlocks - at 2009.12.07 11:09:00
|
11. Client Side Word Filter - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Bomberlocks on 02/12/2009 00:27:12 I don't think it's a good idea at all. There are enough childish people in Eve already. Letting real children in is really not a good idea, I think. I was once in a corp where the ceo would sometim...
- by Bomberlocks - at 2009.12.02 00:26:00
|
12. Projectile Weapons - Balancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Theron Gyrow Edited by: Theron Gyrow on 01/12/2009 19:38:27 Originally by: Bomberlocks Originally by: Yankunytjatjara ....lots of crap... ==> THE ANSWER OF THE ANTI-FOTM MASSES: nurf scorch. ... Bab...
- by Bomberlocks - at 2009.12.02 00:19:00
|
13. I want visual contact in battle :( - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Actually, I would like an EVE client that has no graphics at all, just the brackets, and symbols. Pros: Much, less confusing stuff and you would be able to play Eve on your smartphone. You also won't have to look at the eyesore camo patterns on th...
- by Bomberlocks - at 2009.12.01 17:24:00
|
14. Projectile Weapons - Balancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Yankunytjatjara ....lots of crap... ==> THE ANSWER OF THE ANTI-FOTM MASSES: nurf scorch. ... Baby Jeezuz is crying because in spite of myself, I'm still responding to your trolls. You really, truly are stupid, aren't y...
- by Bomberlocks - at 2009.12.01 17:11:00
|
15. Projectile Weapons - Balancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Damn, they actually published the fact that Projectile weapons have been "rebalanced". I was shocked. I still want to strangle a few CCP devs, but now I only want to do it to a few of them, not all of them. The Naglfar split weapons bonus with the...
- by Bomberlocks - at 2009.11.30 22:46:00
|
16. Tweaks and Changes û The New Player Experience - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Amandin Adouin Lost of stuff. This. Excellent suggestions. I read the tutorials and so got to play the game, but all your points are valid, from the excel in space problem, the controls, the boringness of the new players'...
- by Bomberlocks - at 2009.11.30 16:16:00
|
17. Projectile Weapons - Balancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Don't feed teen angst troll, people. If we say that yes, RvB is fun and cheap, but NOT a comparison to PvP in general, he says we're we're not listening to him and he has RvB stats to prove how wrong we are. Now, if he were actually interested in...
- by Bomberlocks - at 2009.11.30 15:54:00
|
18. Projectile Weapons - Balancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Yankunytjatjara Nah, for the phoon you need energy mngmnt 4, 5 is better but not necessary like for amarrians.... Don't you think it's time you shut the fsck up? You yourself said you don't fly BS yet, so how the hell wou...
- by Bomberlocks - at 2009.11.30 01:47:00
|
19. Projectile Weapons - Balancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Yankunytjatjara :) because deep inside you know I'm not trolling. You're right. Deep down inside I think you're stupid. Quote: .... I'll check it out for myself when I finish some more skilling... When you've do...
- by Bomberlocks - at 2009.11.29 20:06:00
|
20. Projectile Weapons - Balancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Yankunytjatjara ...more verbal mast urbation... edit Johndalar - I know I'm not an english writer, but please try to understand what I say if you're not trolling. I didn't talk about falloff, but point-blank advantage. I'...
- by Bomberlocks - at 2009.11.29 14:35:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |