Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
81. Sticky:New Dev Blog: Carebearing 2.0 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
A question: why don't you nerf reprocessing of modules? Mineral compression is nice in theory but it removes the need of mining in nullsec. If reprocessing efficiency were nerfed progressively, we could see more people going to mine in 0.0.
- by Camios - at 2012.04.27 13:25:00
|
82. How highsec miners threaten EVE, and how we can stop them. Manifesto II. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I read almost all of it, and it was a good read, even if it's obvious that it is a Mittani alt and just focuses on miners while also mission runners deserve their share of punishment. Vocal highsec carebears and mission runners will always try t...
- by Camios - at 2012.04.27 12:12:00
|
83. Sticky:New dev blog: Team Security RMT Update - 3 Weeks in Numbers (YAY) - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Nice, I hope to hear news from your team every month. You could turn this into a monthly blog like "The tales of security Dad" where you tell us numbers. That would really be a good marketing move. Burn them all. On a side note: what did you ...
- by Camios - at 2012.04.26 16:23:00
|
84. Level 4 mission's moving to lowsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Marlona Sky wrote: I like how you think that moving level 4 missions to low sec will somehow get high sec carebears to go into low sec. Highsec risk averse carebears will move to lvl3 and reduce the isk flow into the game. I don't understand...
- by Camios - at 2012.04.26 07:51:00
|
85. Level 4 mission's moving to lowsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Yatama Kautsuo wrote: half the people would probably stop play if this would happen... what's left then for the highsecbears to do? Do lvl 3s. Or move to lowsec. If you are one of those who is just there for the money, then you might unders...
- by Camios - at 2012.04.26 07:43:00
|
86. My blog post on the POS rewrite + discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
It could be cool if the pos system were designed with "public poses" in mind, like POCOs. I remember when there ISS ouposts access was set public, it would be cool if the new system were designed in order to make this policy convenient. Another...
- by Camios - at 2012.04.25 21:20:00
|
87. Sticky:Armor / shield rig changes for Inferno - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Rn Bonnet wrote: You can not balance the prevalence of active vs passive tanking. Many have stated that active tanking "has its place in small gang and pve." What they have not explained is why . The problem fundamentally lies in the nature o...
- by Camios - at 2012.04.25 11:32:00
|
88. Cerlestes' Ore Table: Up-to-date Mineral Prices, Refining Values, and more! - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Some suggestions: The style of the site is very good and probably it is suitable to show all the data regarding moon minerals too. An useful additional information to have could be the volume traded. Your graphs could contain that information too...
- by Camios - at 2012.04.24 21:53:00
|
89. Cerlestes' Ore Table: Up-to-date Mineral Prices, Refining Values, and more! - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Your service is pretty nice and in this period it has been the best way to witness the greatest market mineral mayhem of all times.
- by Camios - at 2012.04.24 10:34:00
|
90. In the feature storm, no mention of the Local-Chat-Intel-Gathering issue. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
An effect of delayed local is that since it is more difficult to find targets, it makes ratting/farming safer (of course cloaker gangs are a bigger problem). Possibly, the reduced risk in 0.0 farming induced by the lack of local could encourage p...
- by Camios - at 2012.04.24 10:31:00
|
91. In the feature storm, no mention of the Local-Chat-Intel-Gathering issue. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cyprus Black wrote: That "strong interest in no local" came from a very small handful of players and their army of alts. CCP generally doesn't bow to the wims of a tiny minority and their terribad ideas, regardless how loud they an their alts ...
- by Camios - at 2012.04.22 22:54:00
|
92. In the feature storm, no mention of the Local-Chat-Intel-Gathering issue. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It's fun to see people saying that delayed local is for "bunch of scrubs who think the reason they can't get ganks on carebears is because of local", and people saying that "Yes, we all want to bumble around nullsec blind and unnable to find fight...
- by Camios - at 2012.04.21 19:14:00
|
93. Sticky:New Dev Blog: What is going on with mineral prices? - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Spc One wrote: Stupid changes. 1. t-1 stuff will become super expensive. 2. Because of this less pvp will occur. 3. Less pvp, less ships lost, less ships made. Instead I see people going for cheaper ships, except the ones who also mine o...
- by Camios - at 2012.04.21 18:08:00
|
94. Sticky:New Dev Blog: What is going on with mineral prices? - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I like the fact that now mining makes sense; I like that mining returns to be the key activity in generating value in this game; and I hope to see giant mining ops with escort. I hope this thing lasts, but I fear it's partly overshootin...
- by Camios - at 2012.04.21 18:03:00
|
95. In the feature storm, no mention of the Local-Chat-Intel-Gathering issue. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I made this thread so that people can support it if they feel like. I would like to hear some concrete stuff from CCP/CSM on this front. Every dude with a bit of immagination can think of what a system like "submarines in space" or whatever would...
- by Camios - at 2012.04.21 17:49:00
|
96. In the feature storm, no mention of the Local-Chat-Intel-Gathering issue. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I have been watching the fanfest stream and read all the devblogs lately. It's good to see a (ongoing and not losing momentum) refocusing on FiS by CCP, but I remember that some time ago there was a somewhat strong interest and discussions around ...
- by Camios - at 2012.04.20 22:41:00
|
97. Sticky:New dev blog: NVIDIA Video Card for PLEX Offer - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
People do some googling and arithmetic and find that it's not convenient to buy a gfx card with isk they need.. Do you understand that this offer is only convenient to those who have lots and lots of isk in their wallet, more than they think they...
- by Camios - at 2012.04.11 17:05:00
|
98. Sticky:New dev blog: NVIDIA Video Card for PLEX Offer - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Buying a 150Gé¼ card for 270Gé¼ does not sound the smartest thing to do; but on the other hand if you have 10 billions isk you don't need at all (neither for paying your subscription in the future), and you have an old gfx card in your 'puter this...
- by Camios - at 2012.04.11 16:57:00
|
99. Sticky:New dev blog: Team Security - Now with 100% more Anti-RMT - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Really nice stuff, I feel a really happy customer Quote: we're expecting to see an average of 100B ISK a day removed from botting accounts. Does it mean that bots provide at least 3 trillions/months, around 12% of total isk bounties collect...
- by Camios - at 2012.04.03 18:19:00
|
100. Titan changes - update - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I think that the problem here is a "social" one. We have dream-team alliances that can field a self sufficient fleet of supercapitals; and supercapital pilots enjoy the company of other like minded individuals. If this is a problem CCP wants to...
- by Camios - at 2012.03.30 17:47:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |