| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
41. Let's talk about Suitonia's suggestions to improve FW - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Hamish Nuwen wrote: Cearain wrote: Hamish You say other players have this intel but they obviously donGÇÖt. Right now let's say IGÇÖm in frerstorn. How many plexes are being run in all the systems withing 2 jumps of me? First requerimen...
- by Cearain - at 2017.03.09 00:15:39
|
42. Let's talk about Suitonia's suggestions to improve FW - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Crosi Wesdo wrote: Um, you cant just swap sides in an argument. You were the one calling similarities between null and FW. I was the one saying there were fundemental design differences which prevent FW from adopting a purely PvP mechanic.. ...
- by Cearain - at 2017.03.08 23:11:05
|
43. Let's talk about Suitonia's suggestions to improve FW - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
X Gallentius wrote: Please stop. Your filter tells everybody where people who won't engage are located. Big freaking deal. You're not going to get fights out of them. And please, somebody on these forums, commit to chasing rabbit plexers so t...
- by Cearain - at 2017.03.08 19:14:35
|
44. Let's talk about Suitonia's suggestions to improve FW - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
X Gallentius wrote: Aves Asio wrote: X Gallentius wrote: You can't have a pvp element if one side decides to not show up. Then what? You are assuming something that i have never suggested. I dont have the answers, my theorycrafting sk...
- by Cearain - at 2017.03.08 15:58:04
|
45. Suitonia for CSM XII - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
Thanks for the response. The intel tool would need to let pilots know where timers are being run before the plex is captured - or the purpose is defeated. After they are captured its too late to defend them. I am not really sure why we would ...
- by Cearain - at 2017.03.08 15:51:39
|
46. Let's talk about Suitonia's suggestions to improve FW - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Hamish I appreciate the attempt but wouldn't you agree that sounds like busy work and shooting structures is not much better than than not shooting structures (if its better at all). It seems to me we have already figured out how to make fighti...
- by Cearain - at 2017.03.08 15:34:04
|
47. Time for the CSM to be Old Yellered - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Jin'taan wrote: Social Injustice Warrior wrote: Theodoric Darkwind wrote: Given that CSM input was most certainly listened to in regards to citadels/ECs and the mining changes I think they are most certainly still quite useful. Citadels h...
- by Cearain - at 2017.03.08 14:02:45
|
48. Let's talk about Suitonia's suggestions to improve FW - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
X Gallentius wrote: Aves Asio wrote: Crosi Wesdo wrote: The reason making isk and making progress in occupancy has to have a significant pve element is that a purely PvP mechanic would be open to any and all manor of abuse ... This is ...
- by Cearain - at 2017.03.08 02:07:58
|
49. Suitonia for CSM XII - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
Thanks for offering some views on faction war. Gorski never would respond to players and certainly never responded to me when I was told to talk to him about fw. I realize that allot of people have different views on fw. I actually like the idea...
- by Cearain - at 2017.03.07 20:04:13
|
50. Let's talk about Suitonia's suggestions to improve FW - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Thanatos Marathon wrote: There actually is a candidate from FW running, and it isn't Suitonia. No offense he may be good, but he seems to be holding his cards close to his chest as to what he would actually do on csm. He says: "Current w...
- by Cearain - at 2017.03.07 19:31:51
|
51. Let's talk about Suitonia's suggestions to improve FW - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Crosi Wesdo wrote: The LP/Plex/Tier system, along with the possibility of station lockouts, is exactly why you found your target in a plex. Cearain wrote: Just because it does not give instant lp or isk does not mean the motivations are no...
- by Cearain - at 2017.03.07 19:17:09
|
52. Let's talk about Suitonia's suggestions to improve FW - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Crosi Wesdo wrote: Cearain wrote: Crosi Wesdo wrote: The reason making isk and making progress in occupancy has to have a significant pve element is that a purely PvP mechanic would be open to any and all manor of abuse or would have to b...
- by Cearain - at 2017.03.07 18:18:54
|
53. Let's talk about Suitonia's suggestions to improve FW - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Crosi Wesdo wrote: The reason making isk and making progress in occupancy has to have a significant pve element is that a purely PvP mechanic would be open to any and all manor of abuse or would have to be so toned down and convoluted that no o...
- by Cearain - at 2017.03.07 15:47:27
|
54. Scylus Black for CSM XII. Faction Warfare, PVP and Low-Sec. - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
It has always been the case that you win sov most efficiently by running away from fights. This has been disheartening to many players who have been in faction war and I believe is the main reason why the vast majority of eve players think fw is a...
- by Cearain - at 2017.03.07 15:34:48
|
55. Let's talk about Suitonia's suggestions to improve FW - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Julius Foederatus wrote: ...We could easily change the system to one where people were basically required to PVP or drop out, but for whatever reason, CCP is afraid of consequences for players. It would be more difficult to enable the losing si...
- by Cearain - at 2017.03.06 22:01:18
|
56. Let's talk about Suitonia's suggestions to improve FW - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Scialt welcome to the huge club of players who joined fw and wondered wtf is this. Nobody cares about the vast majority of systems and nobody has for many years. That is because you best win sov by running away. You do have to choose between f...
- by Cearain - at 2017.03.06 19:51:01
|
57. Let's talk about Suitonia's suggestions to improve FW - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
XG supports the minor tweaks that marathon put forth. I think we can all pretty much agree on those, they are good so far as they go. But I think most agree they are mostly quality of life and other relatively minor improvements. (maybe citadels i...
- by Cearain - at 2017.03.03 16:35:03
|
58. Let's talk about Suitonia's suggestions to improve FW - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Rollbacks and real time intel will work to eliminate or greatly reduce rabbits even if people won't "commit to chasing rabbits." I think you will find that most people will use common sense and see that that letting pvpers know where plexes are ...
- by Cearain - at 2017.03.03 02:14:14
|
59. Let's talk about Suitonia's suggestions to improve FW - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
ALUCARD 1208 wrote: Cearain wrote: ItGÇÖs not like these 2 changes including the intel idea have not had decent support over the years. It has had as much support as just about any faction war idea. And that is why ccp has even promised to...
- by Cearain - at 2017.03.02 20:32:20
|
60. Let's talk about Suitonia's suggestions to improve FW - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Master Sergeant MacRobert wrote: I think you are pushing too hard on this particular idea Caerain, when there is wider support for a number of other iterations that could have significant impact. GǪ. CCP need to look at conflict drivers and...
- by Cearain - at 2017.03.02 16:50:29
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |