Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 |
141. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: You wanted this. Dont whine when you finally realize the repercussions of your selfish bias, rather than the good of the game. Apparently dropping a few thousand more players is worth it, as long as it makes you safer in ...
- by Coralas - at 2017.04.23 16:09:21
|
142. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Infinity Ziona wrote: I spent 3 months out in null sec in a cloaky Ishtar. I didn't die once and I made around 20 billion isk running combat sites. It was in the old northern Goodswarm space mostly. Using wormholes and giant secure containers...
- by Coralas - at 2017.04.23 09:41:25
|
143. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: "Multipurpose exploration ship" has "exploration" as the primary adjective affecting "ship" which indicates that you consider the ship an exploration ship first and multipurpose second, hence my interpretation of your ...
- by Coralas - at 2017.04.23 09:30:07
|
144. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Dracvlad wrote: seriously mate, this game is supposed to be hard... Yet here you are supporting a system that allows you to pass by the defenses of anyone simply by clicking warp to next gate. You can put an armed do...
- by Coralas - at 2017.04.23 03:07:43
|
145. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: I'm not suggesting you're using the wrong tool for the job, I'm saying that the Proteus is not a dedicated exploration ship. You've said yourself that whatever you're doing drones are not the optimal tool for it. With...
- by Coralas - at 2017.04.22 06:09:56
|
146. 6/10-10/10 Guristas DED's still worth doing? - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
SharpestBanana wrote: Hey guys. I quit awhile back, have not done DED sites in null for maybe... 2 years? Wondering if anyone familiar with any of the null DED sites (perferably Guristas, although if there is one that is considered "best" to so...
- by Coralas - at 2017.04.21 06:57:30
|
147. Not enough stuff is being destroyed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: Coralas wrote: Lets go down that rabbit hole and see what can be found. The entire point is that CCP keeps going down that same rabbit hole (ie "pvp like PVE, fewer but smarter PVE adversaries), and we keep finding no...
- by Coralas - at 2017.04.21 06:02:03
|
148. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: Ah, see this seems to be a bit of confusion on your part. First off, the Proteus was never intended as a dedicated exploration ship. There are very few ships in Eve that are built by CCP to fill one singular and speci...
- by Coralas - at 2017.04.21 02:00:07
|
149. Not enough stuff is being destroyed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: Coralas wrote: Ultimately there is no rule book for what _will_ work, but it is most certainly CCPs job to experiment and find out what entertains us. And they fail sometimes. Look at Drifters. and wormholes stuc...
- by Coralas - at 2017.04.20 15:18:51
|
150. Not enough stuff is being destroyed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: This does not change the fact that most mission runners avoid burner missions. This is the point of what I'm saying, CCP keeps making "fewer but smarter enemies" content when that is really a waste of DEV time. I really...
- by Coralas - at 2017.04.20 13:51:18
|
151. Not enough stuff is being destroyed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote: Well, those rat fleets are just one step away from being 100% player like: make them bring 1,200 ships instead of 850, and they will crash the node. And then imagine the headlines: "EVE Online adds new AI so smart i...
- by Coralas - at 2017.04.20 07:19:38
|
152. Not enough stuff is being destroyed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: But the second thing is even more foolish. CCP has tried all that "smarter but fewer enemies" thing. They do it with burner missions (that most people ignore), Drifters (that most people avoid like the plague) and Mining ope...
- by Coralas - at 2017.04.20 04:44:53
|
153. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: This is just bad logic. "Oh, I'm using the hull with a fit that isn't good for what I'm trying to do, but this one hull does alright so that hull must be fine because it enables my play-style." You are trying to use ...
- by Coralas - at 2017.04.20 03:33:04
|
154. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: Coralas wrote: The price difference between t1 hulls and t3 allows you to own several t1 hulls with different rigs for the same price and locate them at points of instant travel. t1 rigs are also now at fundamentally ...
- by Coralas - at 2017.04.20 03:11:09
|
155. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: How many of those cruisers can swap out rigs without destroying them and change the very bonuses of the ship on the fly? The price difference between t1 hulls and t3 allows you to own several t1 hulls with different rigs f...
- by Coralas - at 2017.04.19 23:52:36
|
156. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Coralas wrote: Not only is that wrong, its not a rebuttal of the point. I do actually fly vexors. And people who didn't want the nano nerf flew battleships. You are one of those people that follow the FOTM and don't want ...
- by Coralas - at 2017.04.19 16:28:59
|
157. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Coralas wrote: I can't see the point to such a ship, if nothing else, we don't need more ships at that scale of hitpoints. That's because you wan't something horrendously overpowered not something handy. Not only i...
- by Coralas - at 2017.04.19 15:16:37
|
158. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Gimme Sake wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: Gimme Sake wrote: Why should SoE have an equivalent pve exploration ship when they're pretty much specialised for that purpose? Why do you ask me? I never claimed there should be. I pointed out ...
- by Coralas - at 2017.04.19 12:19:50
|
159. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Coralas wrote: For the proteus, that would give you the option of a deimos that requires a whole new skill tree or a stratios that requires a whole new skill tree, level 5 skills and has no cargo capacity. More like betwe...
- by Coralas - at 2017.04.19 12:16:31
|
160. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: The original idea behind these ships was to have a cruiser that was very adaptable, what we got was a pocket battleship that did the job of some 60+ ships only better. In the tiercide plan CCP have these ships slated to land so...
- by Coralas - at 2017.04.19 06:17:09
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |