Pages: [1] 2 |
1. test server - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
In the forums that is all about the test server. Read the forum descriptions and find out
- by CrayC - at 2008.12.16 15:44:00
|
2. test server - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Read the sticky that explains it?
- by CrayC - at 2008.12.16 15:41:00
|
3. Hey, About Killmails and a easyer way to access them. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
What's the point with statistics if all you want to do with them, is form a bigger e-peen?
- by CrayC - at 2008.06.14 04:08:00
|
4. New Stargate: Maurassi ---> anywhere!!! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Metsino Konchura Theres often 100+ people in these systems, all of whom MUST pass through Jita if they wish to do anything in this game. Wrong. You only need to pass Jita once! If you do need to go through it on a daily/...
- by CrayC - at 2008.06.14 03:52:00
|
5. Should there be a Factional Warfare Forum? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
No.
- by CrayC - at 2008.06.08 12:00:00
|
6. Empyrean Age feedback thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Saul Elsyn Aside from selling the modules at Jita that I got with LP there's very little use I have for those modules and ships... You don't HAVE to spend your LPs, you know that, right? They are an added bonus, but if y...
- by CrayC - at 2008.06.06 19:36:00
|
7. Empyrean Age feedback thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Siege I guess it's just a two way contest in the regions, "Caldari or Gallente" and "Amarr or Minmatar" not a 4-way grab for land. Correct. Gallente will invade Caldari systems, just like Minmatar will control Amarr area...
- by CrayC - at 2008.06.06 19:34:00
|
8. FW standing confusion. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
D, provided that your negative standing doesn't lower the corp's standing to Gallente below the limit, in which case it will be kicked out.
- by CrayC - at 2008.06.06 19:29:00
|
9. Empyrean Age feedback thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Sturmwolke Don't know if this had been brought up before, but capturing a Gallante Major Installation/Stronghold(?) i.e. the unrestricted beacon which had no warp gate, ridiculously easy using a standard T1 frigate. Reme...
- by CrayC - at 2008.06.06 15:29:00
|
10. what happens and who do i report to - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Hirana Yoshida If it was a smart bomb there are no-one to blame. Uhm, how about the pilot that fitted the bomb? Ever since the "No podding allowed" was introduced on the test server, I always felt that smartbombs sho...
- by CrayC - at 2008.06.06 10:27:00
|
11. Pods. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I doubt it will be much of an issue on TQ, as you said. So it's fine the way it is. You know how vulnerable you are in a pod and should someone enter the area, you either warp out or hope your buds are close enough to save you...
- by CrayC - at 2008.06.06 10:22:00
|
12. can a char join NPC starting corp like CAS (or is that a bug) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
If you quit or get kicked from your current corp, you will return to your original NPC corp. Joining others, I know nothing about...
- by CrayC - at 2005.02.22 16:16:00
|
13. When a skill is finished while offline - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Goldengamegod It would also be nice of the skill would just keep on training to the next level if I'm not around to start a new one. Ah, the good old Auto-training... Nah, can't have that in EVE, would make too powerful ...
- by CrayC - at 2004.12.26 22:57:00
|
14. When a skill is finished while offline - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Goldengamegod It would also be nice of the skill would just keep on training to the next level if I'm not around to start a new one. Ah, the good old Auto-training... Nah, can't have that in EVE, would make too powerful ...
- by CrayC - at 2004.12.26 22:57:00
|
15. Exodus - bugs and suggestions AKA constructive critics - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Mining Maxx In other words, to do a quick scan for roids (or something else) in your surrounding you have to make the scanner window pretty big as the constellation view and scanner probe part of the window uses much of the ...
- by CrayC - at 2004.11.27 20:34:00
|
16. Exodus - bugs and suggestions AKA constructive critics - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Mining Maxx In other words, to do a quick scan for roids (or something else) in your surrounding you have to make the scanner window pretty big as the constellation view and scanner probe part of the window uses much of the ...
- by CrayC - at 2004.11.27 20:34:00
|
17. Micro Aux Power Core CPU bug - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Elrathias Originally by: Meridius Originally by: flummox this will be awesome!! can't wait to see Small, Medium, Large APC's. and TL2 versions... Don't think any medium or large sizes will come out tbh...
- by CrayC - at 2004.11.16 16:03:00
|
18. Micro Aux Power Core CPU bug - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Elrathias Originally by: Meridius Originally by: flummox this will be awesome!! can't wait to see Small, Medium, Large APC's. and TL2 versions... Don't think any medium or large sizes will come out tbh...
- by CrayC - at 2004.11.16 16:03:00
|
19. Is this an Autopilot bug? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
No bug. The autopilot have raised the overall security, by passing through a few higher rated systems. First route = average security of 0.66 Second route = average security of 0.8 Yes, it takes a few more jumps, but you are more safe with the ...
- by CrayC - at 2004.10.27 11:33:00
|
20. Is this an Autopilot bug? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
No bug. The autopilot have raised the overall security, by passing through a few higher rated systems. First route = average security of 0.66 Second route = average security of 0.8 Yes, it takes a few more jumps, but you are more safe with the ...
- by CrayC - at 2004.10.27 11:33:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |