Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 |
121. Delusions of grandeur - Do you get it??? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ralph King-Griffin wrote: They are mauwldy (say it like it's spelled,should sound like a Dublin accent) looking things, really really ugly imo. They're pretty bad. But I was already at recons 4.5 when I looked and realise how terrible they...
- by Crumplecorn - at 2015.01.07 11:17:16
|
122. Delusions of grandeur - Do you get it??? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Scipio Artelius wrote: Ooh shiny Recon changes, I better train that... I started training them too for the same reason, and so that I would have something training, and because I had recons 4 for some reason which I can't explain since until...
- by Crumplecorn - at 2015.01.07 10:56:29
|
123. Delusions of grandeur - Do you get it??? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I don't plan. The downside of this is the amount of time I've spent not training skills due to not wanting any new skills right now.
- by Crumplecorn - at 2015.01.07 07:29:50
|
124. CCP you need to HTFU. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
"Please remove all instances of the following: ****" I can honestly say I have never had this said to me, in a game or real life.
- by Crumplecorn - at 2015.01.07 06:15:45
|
125. Constructive feedback thread on the new UI - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Having spent some time with it, and set it to Carbon + Blur Off + minimal Transparancy, it no longer totally offends my eyes and I can use it fine, although even this far on I still keep pressing the wrong buttons from time to time (I've stopped p...
- by Crumplecorn - at 2015.01.07 06:11:52
|
126. 'Sucker-Bubble' mechanics. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Noriko Mai wrote: Crumplecorn wrote: Cancel Align NOW wrote: Please explain how the warp computer works? To use an analogy, the warp computer peers into the distance to estimate the number of steps between here and where it is going. It ...
- by Crumplecorn - at 2015.01.06 19:56:32
|
127. The Eve economy? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Adela Talvanen wrote: Doc Fury wrote: No. Why? The economic constant was set by CCP to force a static economy. This is not even close to being their greatest blunder however.
- by Crumplecorn - at 2015.01.06 17:40:05
|
128. Bumping. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Crumplecorn wrote: Lucas Kell wrote: It's obviously a mechanic that is primarily used to grief noobs Indeed, with something so obvious there's hardly a need to bother looking at how it is used. After all, it is obvious....
- by Crumplecorn - at 2015.01.06 16:26:13
|
129. Bumping. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: It's obviously a mechanic that is primarily used to grief noobs Indeed, with something so obvious there's hardly a need to bother looking at how it is used. After all, it is obvious.
- by Crumplecorn - at 2015.01.06 16:21:00
|
130. My Only Gripe About Eve Online Is......... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Leannor wrote: You forget the best reason for the sub fee ... gets rid of the transiant riff raff who don't care about EVE. If you're paying for something, you're gunna commit to it. Be it as a piewat, Jita scammer, spy, leader, flunky or care...
- by Crumplecorn - at 2015.01.06 15:47:59
|
131. Make Damage Control a passive module - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nikk Narrel wrote: Over-extending a concept is a straw-man argument, and therefore proves nothing. No. If having no-brainers to remember to do adds to the game, having more no-brainers to remember should add even more to the game. Nikk Nar...
- by Crumplecorn - at 2015.01.06 15:43:05
|
132. Make Damage Control a passive module - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nikk Narrel wrote: Not at all, and I think you are perfectly aware that you are extending the logic well past it's intended limit. Yes, to illustrate the fault. Nikk Narrel wrote: I am pointing out, that it is player skill, not character s...
- by Crumplecorn - at 2015.01.06 15:02:44
|
133. Bumping. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hicksimus wrote: this seems to add nothing to the game Wow, that was pretty poor insight on your part, considering that the Code is still a hot topic of discussion and a motivator of conflict and destruction, over two years on.
- by Crumplecorn - at 2015.01.06 14:51:58
|
134. Make Damage Control a passive module - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nikk Narrel wrote: Let me get this straight: The idea that something you would obviously want to do, being grounds for making it automatic... Yes. Putting aside for the moment the question of whether specific examples of automation are a good...
- by Crumplecorn - at 2015.01.06 14:40:34
|
135. Any new info about EVA ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote: That's some sweeping (and shocking) statement. There are lots of things that are not in EVE... Indeed there are, that is why I play many games that are not EVE.
- by Crumplecorn - at 2015.01.06 14:34:16
|
136. EVE Forum Usage metrics.....since 2011! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: They do not care to be relevant, but to sell stuff or to farm "impressions" or "clicks" or whatever triggers income. After all, most (including very popular) web sites manage to get "conversions" just by slapping some du...
- by Crumplecorn - at 2015.01.06 14:32:13
|
137. Bumping. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP should certainly stop people bumping this thread.
- by Crumplecorn - at 2015.01.06 13:42:27
|
138. Any new info about EVA ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote: If it was another game, then it would not matter whether it was added to EVE or just as a standalone project. That was rather my point above. You aren't enhancing or bringing more people to EVE by adding non-EVE thin...
- by Crumplecorn - at 2015.01.06 13:31:06
|
139. Any new info about EVA ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote: EVE can't grow by just doing more of the same because it already is doing the same and isn't growing EVE has seen periods of growth, stability and decline while doing 'more of the same'. All of it's growth ever has b...
- by Crumplecorn - at 2015.01.06 09:35:59
|
140. EVE Forum Usage metrics.....since 2011! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: True, you can have TWO or more (oh the horror!) mediocre movies, including outside of the internet. This changes all, really. Also, the fact they bore / whatever you, it's a tell tale sign everybody shall also feel the s...
- by Crumplecorn - at 2015.01.06 09:15:58
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |