Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Total war? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Leave the current factions as they are. Add Serpentis, Blood Raider, Angels and Guristas who are at war with everyone... (except maybe not enough pilots to populate eight factions... *sigh*)
- by Cyniac - at 2014.06.12 16:53:00
|
2. Help, Level 3 Missions as Gallente? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Myrm flying 101 1) Tank You need to adapt your tank to your foes. It seems as if you are flying against Guristas and/or Caldari which will hit with kinetic / thermal damage. You are using an explosive and a kinetic hardener - use those. 2) Cop...
- by Cyniac - at 2012.03.19 17:30:00
|
3. A True Answer To High Sec Incursions - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Dmitri Dracov wrote: Keep the rewards the same, just lower the sec status of the systems the Incursions are affecting to 0.4 until the Incursions are over! It's adds to the roleplay element - Sanshas Nation have taken over the systems - allows ...
- by Cyniac - at 2012.03.15 00:25:00
|
4. A win/win solution for fixing the issue of Local - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Mfume Apocal wrote: Cyniac wrote: While there is merit to your statement (bots can and will adapt) you fail to address the fact that the current system IS perfectly safe for bots, so any changes can at worse preserve the status quo and at be...
- by Cyniac - at 2012.03.03 04:49:00
|
5. A win/win solution for fixing the issue of Local - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Cearain wrote: Cyniac If I were to provide data to you that shows low sec and null sec get more pvp per person than wormholes, even if we only include the time after wormholes have been around, would you agree local is fine? That would inde...
- by Cyniac - at 2012.03.03 04:42:00
|
6. A win/win solution for fixing the issue of Local - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Double post! Sorry about that.
- by Cyniac - at 2012.03.03 03:25:00
|
7. A win/win solution for fixing the issue of Local - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Cearain wrote: CCP diagoras posted the data that shows wormhole space inolves much less frequent pvp per person. As for the rest look at the killboards. You will see lots of worm hole pvp involves ganks. I think you are referring to this d...
- by Cyniac - at 2012.03.03 03:22:00
|
8. A win/win solution for fixing the issue of Local - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Cearain wrote: "Instant intel:" You need instant intel because if you get the intel too late it does no good. If you don't get intel that is any good then you are playing a game where intel is irrelevant. And that dumbs eve down. Well I supp...
- by Cyniac - at 2012.03.03 00:20:00
|
9. A win/win solution for fixing the issue of Local - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
M1k3y Koontz wrote: ( leaving local alone is a significant point here, its not broken ) Why local is broken. 1) Instant intel 2) Perfectly safe nullsec (due to instant intel) 3) Perfectly safe instant intel for bots - (BROKEN!) Or if you w...
- by Cyniac - at 2012.03.02 01:30:00
|
10. Cloaking should have a manual cycle or be cap intensive - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Torothin wrote: Something needs to be done about this. The days of sitting non-chalantly afk cloaked for hours on end needs to stop. CCP at least make these people have to be active in order to maintain a cloak. Discuss! I understand your pr...
- by Cyniac - at 2012.02.29 15:33:00
|
11. To Kill a Falcon - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
If it wasn't for the ludicrously long targeting range of the falcon I'd say the Arazu would be the perfect counter - sensor damp, long point, slow death. Doubt if it would happen though... sensor damps need love.
- by Cyniac - at 2012.02.23 15:53:00
|
12. overview problems since patch - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Filskit wrote: * Sending two mouse clicks on a target in overview or space will set approach on it. Before a recent patch, this was true even when you also had CTRL pressed to try and lock while approaching. Now spamming mouse clicks doesn't se...
- by Cyniac - at 2012.02.20 16:48:00
|
13. Seeking advice regarding private owned Titan - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Suleiman Shouaa wrote: Freddy Dreamer wrote: Ryuce wrote: If you choose to listen to the guys above me regarding BLOPS have a look at their bridge and jump range. These are quiet limited compared to titans and will from time to time becom...
- by Cyniac - at 2012.02.15 19:37:00
|
14. Why my gank fail? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
If GANK then CONCORD then SEC LOSS then GET_NEW_SHIP then GANK_AGAIN Else If GANK then EVADE_CONCORD then BANHAMMER then NO_MORE_GANK_EVER Or something like that.
- by Cyniac - at 2012.02.13 18:31:00
|
15. counter to tracking disrupters - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Missiles and drones are the traditional answer. Neuts can do the job too. Smartbombs have been known to have a situational advantage there to. Or of course you could just blob till they die. Now if you insist on using turrets... Good piloting...
- by Cyniac - at 2012.02.08 17:43:00
|
16. How to use the Scanner thing - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Dorian, I think you have a great career ahead of you as a moon surveyor! You got it down pat, point and shoot. *hiccups*
- by Cyniac - at 2012.02.03 18:30:00
|
17. How to insta-lock ? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
It's more like this: 1) You decloak for align in server tick 1 Until the end of that tick you are still cloaked from coming through the gate. If you try to activate your on board cloak, you will fail. The loki has no way of seeing you to lock yo...
- by Cyniac - at 2012.02.01 15:49:00
|
18. Viewable at a safespot - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Yeah... sometimes it's a bit ridiculous I've had to go WAAAAAYYY out in some instances so that the friggin gate (though more often station) grip finally drops off. There is no set distance, but 250 clicks is definitely too close for comfort. Sorr...
- by Cyniac - at 2012.01.23 19:23:00
|
19. low-sec belts - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
I see there are many lowsecs. As a lowsec carebear and explorer I find that I mostly run into the following: 1) Other explorers - damned competition 2) Fleets forming up to head out on a null roam - they tend to stick together and get worried wh...
- by Cyniac - at 2012.01.20 16:01:00
|
20. I did it, and I hate myself... - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Emily Poast wrote: I am normally a pure Gallente pilot, but given our current woes, I wanted to have a ship that is actually useful in small gangs. Someone should tie you to the whipping post and take out the lash... oh wait.
- by Cyniac - at 2011.11.09 18:32:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |