Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 30 40 |
141. Time to retire my space potato - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Jastra wrote: or a faction BS, anyone got an opinion ? Faction BS rocks. Go for a Navy Domi ;-) Seriously though if you train up gunnery skills a gunnery based shield tanked Navy Dominix is surprisingly good, though not as good as a M...
- by Cyniac - at 2012.03.14 14:23:00
|
142. CCP, please update PI base prices for taxes - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Diamaht Nevain wrote: What I'm saying is that taxes are not baked into the pricing with this system. Someone at 10% tax rate cannot compete with someone at 3% tax rate. Playing and monitoring the market is not as important as customs office own...
- by Cyniac - at 2012.03.14 11:04:00
|
143. CCP is insulting its customers with this latest release - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I've not had a crash but there is definitely a loss of performance associated with the launcher - when you couple the resources which the launcher needs with the resources which are needed by CQ (which is the first thing any new player will see) y...
- by Cyniac - at 2012.03.14 11:01:00
|
144. 44 fails out of 45 attempts at invention - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Bugsy VanHalen wrote: Statistically for every run of bad luck you should get a run of good luck to even it out. This is a very misleading statement as future events are independent of past events. The only thing which is true is that you'll...
- by Cyniac - at 2012.03.13 16:37:00
|
145. 0.0 'black-ops' style Tengu fitt? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Master Ventris wrote: Last time I checked, a pod could passive tank a 3 launcher tengu with the covops sub fitted The point of a T3 is you can customise it to fit the job, just change the fit depending on what you need. This fit would work t...
- by Cyniac - at 2012.03.13 15:57:00
|
146. How many players will be online after eve launches in Japan on the 28th? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Doc Severide wrote: It is obvious that they aren't talking to me and why bother typing when the chat is obviously English? I don't want my chat filled with their gibberish so blocking them is perfect... Chat is obviously in English ...
- by Cyniac - at 2012.03.13 15:49:00
|
147. Research Alliance (looking for) - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Vane Onyx wrote: if i am in a research alliance with a dummy corp, nobody needs to hold my BPOs i can research them from corp hangar with scientific networking /facepalm... Think about it this way. When your BPOs are in the corp hangar who ...
- by Cyniac - at 2012.03.08 03:25:00
|
148. Joining what alliance, for "safe" 0.o/lowsec carebaering? - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Superterrier wrote: Erm - what? Back in '06 there were no Sanctums - just belt rats and exploration... Much more limited... Umm - yeah... Hehe - point taken my bad... I was not around in 2006 Nevertheless the whole nullsec PVE mechanic ha...
- by Cyniac - at 2012.03.07 18:45:00
|
149. Joining what alliance, for "safe" 0.o/lowsec carebaering? - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Boiling Tar wrote: On a last note. I am actually a bit supprised that there is not an alliance out there that uses the financiall force that the masses of carebears out there is. Think of the huge isk potential of having a dedicated corp set...
- by Cyniac - at 2012.03.07 17:03:00
|
150. I'm tired of making individual purchases - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Not So Perfect wrote: If there are a bunch of orders up selling a certain item (say tritanium), I would like to say something like: "I will buy up to X units at up to Y price" and have the broker automatically make those purchases for me, But...
- by Cyniac - at 2012.03.06 16:18:00
|
151. Unlucky or just the way things are now as the life in the industry world? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Melikor Tissant wrote: I would suggest in general that you just move your operations if you can, to another system. It might be that you are in the middle of a hornets nest, which is the reason why you are being ganked so much. ^^ This. When...
- by Cyniac - at 2012.03.06 15:52:00
|
152. Probes - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
7 probes for me though I'll give Jack's 8 probe setup a twirl, seems to work well.
- by Cyniac - at 2012.03.06 15:38:00
|
153. CCP, please update PI base prices for taxes - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Unforgiven Storm wrote: I would like to request CCP to update the base values of PI taxes to reflect current market changes, the same way and interval you update base prices for ship insurance purposes. I think you've not thought through th...
- by Cyniac - at 2012.03.06 12:00:00
|
154. T2 ship making, any tools to help? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
T2 ship market is a bit up and down these days. As always. Volume is key to survival but volume is also a risk as these things don't move so fast that you can't be caught by the market doing its thing. Good luck.
- by Cyniac - at 2012.03.06 11:18:00
|
155. Question: how to protect an industry corp? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Velicitia wrote: 1. don't look interesting 2. if you do get a dec, fly coordinated ... a decent fleet of rookies with a decent leader calling the shots will give the other guys a run for their money. Again this - one other thing, the locatio...
- by Cyniac - at 2012.03.06 11:03:00
|
156. A win/win solution for fixing the issue of Local - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Mfume Apocal wrote: Cyniac wrote: While there is merit to your statement (bots can and will adapt) you fail to address the fact that the current system IS perfectly safe for bots, so any changes can at worse preserve the status quo and at be...
- by Cyniac - at 2012.03.03 04:49:00
|
157. A win/win solution for fixing the issue of Local - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Cearain wrote: Cyniac If I were to provide data to you that shows low sec and null sec get more pvp per person than wormholes, even if we only include the time after wormholes have been around, would you agree local is fine? That would inde...
- by Cyniac - at 2012.03.03 04:42:00
|
158. Decryptors... - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Professor Alphane wrote: Nalha Saldana wrote: wow you really go to the length of posting on a forum before searching on google... Wow you really trust a simple search engine more than a human mind.... For the record... IIRC when a sp...
- by Cyniac - at 2012.03.03 03:47:00
|
159. A win/win solution for fixing the issue of Local - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Double post! Sorry about that.
- by Cyniac - at 2012.03.03 03:25:00
|
160. A win/win solution for fixing the issue of Local - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Cearain wrote: CCP diagoras posted the data that shows wormhole space inolves much less frequent pvp per person. As for the rest look at the killboards. You will see lots of worm hole pvp involves ganks. I think you are referring to this d...
- by Cyniac - at 2012.03.03 03:22:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 30 40 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |