| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
61. Sticky:AFK CloakingGäó: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
- What makes people think a vni should be a good ratting ship for null? And whos fault is it for not fitting a ratting shio properly? - The cloaker does not know how many people you have able to respond or hiding behind your own cyno.
- by Daichi Yamato - at 2017.07.03 05:09:50
|
62. Suggestion for new module Point-defence System - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Why would anyone use smartbombs then?
- by Daichi Yamato - at 2017.07.03 05:04:28
|
63. New display setting request: Tactical. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Not unless you plan on turning everything off and working with just an overview and blocky icons in black space. As long as ships and stations need models rendered you're eventually going to run into problems like this .
- by Daichi Yamato - at 2017.06.28 11:08:30
|
64. Hull repairers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
An active hull tank would behave like an active armour set-up. You only want to active hull set-up because you get a single mod that adds a huge amount to all of your resists. If there was a decent active hull set-up it'd be better than active ar...
- by Daichi Yamato - at 2017.06.28 10:56:20
|
65. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
They still have a ridiculous amount of damage and tank.
- by Daichi Yamato - at 2017.06.27 00:09:01
|
66. Supercarrier Force Auxilliary Ships (Logistical Supercarriers) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
The point of fax and their siege mode is to put a limit in the amount of dps a fleet can tank. Being swallowed by overwhelming dps is deliberate. Otherwise you can just scale up infinitely and have unkillable supers again. If only there was somet...
- by Daichi Yamato - at 2017.06.25 11:05:31
|
67. an idea let me know what you thank, thank you for you time - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Agondray wrote: Daichi Yamato wrote: ^^ Free multi boxing barges would be bad. and how exactly do you multibox alpha accounts freely? some magic VPN that multiplies your IP? An array of laptops and computers spread around the room?
- by Daichi Yamato - at 2017.06.24 22:34:15
|
68. Special Edition Ships need insurance fixed - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
What's the 'proper' value of a special addition ship?
- by Daichi Yamato - at 2017.06.24 00:21:48
|
69. Built In Warp Disruptor - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Is there anything stopping you from fitting a point at the moment? And if a free scram allows you to beat the bad guy, how can you not fight him off without holding him on grid?
- by Daichi Yamato - at 2017.06.23 19:29:41
|
70. an idea let me know what you thank, thank you for you time - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
^^ Free multi boxing barges would be bad.
- by Daichi Yamato - at 2017.06.23 19:26:13
|
71. Streamlining BC's BS's - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Just an fyi, the geddon is a combat bs.
- by Daichi Yamato - at 2017.06.22 21:47:59
|
72. Streamlining BC's BS's - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
^^^ But you don't because they aren't that useful where you get almost as many mids with the same str e-war in a cruiser for a fraction of the cost. What maybe interesting however is aoe e-war like super carriers get but scaled down to bs size.
- by Daichi Yamato - at 2017.06.22 09:17:13
|
73. Streamlining BC's BS's - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
You have t2 to progress to. You don't beed progression of everything to infinity, like there is no tackling battleship and there doesn't need to be. Bear in mind scorps don't see huge use. This is because e-war does not scale with size. A griffin...
- by Daichi Yamato - at 2017.06.22 07:44:23
|
74. Streamlining BC's BS's - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Not against disruptor battleships but don't you dare make the domi one. The hyp is the battleship thats barely used that was shoe horned into a role with the last balance pass. Disruption bc's are meh. Not much difference between them and cruiser...
- by Daichi Yamato - at 2017.06.21 17:02:37
|
75. Probably been discussed a million times, but Large Transports please - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
With the orca at 140k and a bulk head freighter at just less than 400k, what gap are you talking about?
- by Daichi Yamato - at 2017.06.21 07:18:30
|
76. Making Drones More Than Just "Set and Forget DPS" - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Tiberius NoVegas wrote: Daichi Yamato wrote: This is a huge amount of complexity when you can just micro manage your drones with skill and the best pilot wins. Programming them is going to be tedious as hell. And different fleets may requir...
- by Daichi Yamato - at 2017.06.21 07:04:07
|
77. Locality -or- I missed my target and struck dead the man next to him... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Tells me im not constructive. Then tells me i should not let people fly with me if i don't want to suffer 10% tidi for even a mid size fight. Why don't you see what a fight is like in tidi? Have you tried warping in 10% tidi? Can you even imagine...
- by Daichi Yamato - at 2017.06.21 06:55:30
|
78. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Matthias Ancaladron wrote: So are we all agreed? Delete t3s entirely from game yet? Yes? Great! Good job everyone, last one out of thread turn off lights. If only we could.
- by Daichi Yamato - at 2017.06.21 06:28:37
|
79. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Because power creep is bad. A ship to end all ships just means everyone flies one ship. No meaningful choices is boring for a game and means noobs are less relevant until they can fly such ships. Doesn't matter how expensive you make it, or how...
- by Daichi Yamato - at 2017.06.21 06:27:40
|
80. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Omnathious Deninard wrote: These look like they will out tank and out DPS HACs still. They will have heavily nerfed t3 mobility by the looks of things. Like someone said, you could class them as bc's,
- by Daichi Yamato - at 2017.06.20 05:05:34
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |