Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Sticky:Notice: Investgation and Prize Item Freeze for Teams in ATXIII - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Bad Bobby wrote: [quote=DeadDuck] It is still legal though. They are known by "Crook Islands" it's because the only thing legal is actually the Company, the facade, the name "Hydra" in this paralelism, if you prefer. What happens behind tho...
- by DeadDuck - at 2015.09.21 10:00:58
|
2. Sticky:Notice: Investgation and Prize Item Freeze for Teams in ATXIII - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Bad Bobby wrote: You can argue with me on these points as much as you like, but the facts remain the same. There is no history of cheating in HYDRA. Yeah... reminds me those Offshore Companys based in the Cook Islands. They are "legal", but ...
- by DeadDuck - at 2015.09.21 09:38:43
|
3. Sticky:Notice: Investgation and Prize Item Freeze for Teams in ATXIII - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Mr Rive wrote: GROUND XERO wrote: Before PL is screaming for bans...i wanna ask why they are still allowed to join AT after throwing a match with dual tanked vagas... because everyone knows this must have been a thrown match... what on e...
- by DeadDuck - at 2015.09.17 09:23:38
|
4. Sticky:Notice: Investgation and Prize Item Freeze for Teams in ATXIII - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Akrasjel Lanate wrote: EVE is meta don't be surprised when they play the game that way. End result is what matters Wrong. EVE is a product that CCP sells. People, don't seem to understand that, there are RL jobs dependent on how well EVE ...
- by DeadDuck - at 2015.09.16 16:00:40
|
5. Alliance Tournament Ships - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
The AT ships should have a higher point value then their normal ship classes. A Ettana having the same point base of a Basilisk, or a Malice having the same point values of a Retribution is laughable. People all saw the power of these ships yes...
- by DeadDuck - at 2015.08.24 12:00:20
|
6. Adjustments to AT13 rules? - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
The strategy is simple really. If facing tougher opponents in series you risk AT ships until you are in a position to be on the finals. Even if you lose 3-4 AT ships during qualifying you are playing to get access to 50 bpc's of that year tournam...
- by DeadDuck - at 2015.05.13 20:58:18
|
7. Adjustments to AT13 rules? - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Bob Shaftoes wrote: Most of the AT ships are actually pretty bad for tournaments now , since CCPs ship rebalancing imitative. I personally would support a flat 1 point increase for all AT hulls to reflect their increased power , but even this ...
- by DeadDuck - at 2015.05.11 14:25:47
|
8. Adjustments to AT13 rules? - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
TBH the most important rule is to put all the previous AT ship prizes with agravated points cost. Most of these ships are so heavily unbalanced that they give a decisive advantage to whoever uses them. No matter if you actually won the right to ...
- by DeadDuck - at 2015.05.11 10:58:47
|
9. Drones and AT XII upsets: balancing tournaments and 0.0 warfare - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
sevyn nine wrote: very good post Maybe you should post this in the Features & Ideas Discussion forums also
- by DeadDuck - at 2014.09.08 16:53:00
|
10. Best AT ever? - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Very competitive AT this year. The most competitivive I've seen in these last years, with an extreme series of very close fights. If it was the best, I have my doubts: a) The number of boundry violations from the pilots involved was unacceptably...
- by DeadDuck - at 2014.09.08 12:52:00
|
11. why is nobody using smartbombs??? - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Smart Bombs are without any doubt the best counter to prevent this tounement trend of using drones to apply damage and are also the best counter to destroy the tinker setups relying on remote reppings with drone repair assistance. Last year when ...
- by DeadDuck - at 2014.09.01 10:50:00
|
12. Pilot quality - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Forlorn Wongraven wrote: I am not sure if you understand that this is a lot more adrenaline and far more stressful than normal TQ pvp. I know that this is way more intensive then tranquility pvp, trusty me, since I already have experience of...
- by DeadDuck - at 2014.08.24 23:30:00
|
13. Pilot quality - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Larg Kellein wrote: I think your memory is off regarding the number of boundary violations in previous years. Way off. Maybe not 3-4 but for sure way less then this year... now it was a RA maelstrom and have doubts regarding the RA griffin...
- by DeadDuck - at 2014.08.24 20:04:00
|
14. Pilot quality - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Is it me or this year the average pilot quality in this year AT is way lower then what we are used to see? The number of boundry violations and awfull setups is surprising. From the usual 3-4 boundrys in entire tournements of previous years you p...
- by DeadDuck - at 2014.08.24 18:57:00
|
15. Syndicate Competitive League 4 - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
At what time the draw results will be known ? TY
- by DeadDuck - at 2013.08.16 13:26:00
|
16. Most surprising / underrated team - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Kithrus wrote: Widely renowned for crappy pvp? What? Well for the vast majority of the pilots out there: CVA = Providence = Noobs. The fact there are literally towsands of pilots from hundreds of corps from dozens of alliances living in Pr...
- by DeadDuck - at 2013.08.08 14:12:00
|
17. BEST EVER - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
By far the best tournment ever: a) The new bracket system with every single match counting; b) The Crest applications (This is the best really. Have the possibility of analysing each fight and correct the team action, wow); c) The amount of clos...
- by DeadDuck - at 2013.08.06 14:31:00
|
18. Most surprising / underrated team - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Shamis Orzoz wrote: Exodus should't be a surprise to anybody. They are good. They were good last year, and after watching them the first weekend of this tourney I knew they were contenders. Indeed after the 1st weekend I saw that they had...
- by DeadDuck - at 2013.08.05 12:37:00
|
19. Most surprising / underrated team - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Exodus was defintivelly the biggest surprise. They were pretty much unknown before the AT Tournement and there they went until the semi finals. Irony of ironys they meet their end to the shield version of the 3 domis setup while we lost to the sa...
- by DeadDuck - at 2013.08.05 09:45:00
|
20. First round's list of winners announced - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Amarr Victor
- by DeadDuck - at 2013.07.20 14:28:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |