Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
381. Is CCP allergic to the concept of drones doing *GASP* more damage? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Ephemeron Like it or not, price is a valid balancing factor. Otherwise everyone would fly only officer modules, cause they better than t2 in every way Nope, price isn't a valid balancing factor. It never has been, and ne...
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.07.14 18:56:00
|
382. Why PVP can be so painful, from a PVE perspective. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'd wager 95% of people would choose to grind dumb NPCs and rake in easy cash, than experience challenging NPC AI for the sake of entertainment and pvp training. Your plea falls on deaf/hypocritical ears, OP.
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.07.14 18:39:00
|
383. Is CCP allergic to the concept of drones doing *GASP* more damage? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Ephemeron The only reason faction ammo makes t2 ammo obsolete is cause CCP made it ridiculously cheap. Drones don't have that problem. Faction ammo obsoletes most high damage T2 ammo on function, not price. The only exce...
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.07.14 18:35:00
|
384. Is CCP allergic to the concept of drones doing *GASP* more damage? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This is a rage thread you wouldn't have posted, had you been thinking clearly. The answers are pretty obvious. Faction drones are a lower meta level than T2. T2 weapons are usually superior than faction. It makes sense for drones to work the same...
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.07.14 18:33:00
|
385. Hey, check out this powerful gaming laptop - in Out of Pod Experience [original thread]
Perfect for rendering those EVE screenshots at high fps.
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.07.14 16:10:00
|
386. What is the worst thing to call somebody in eve? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Ephemeron There are many openly carebear players in EVE, proud to be carebear By virtue of being stupid carebears, they're too lazy to obtain real redemption and acceptance. But they want it anyway, and so this is but on...
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.07.13 20:09:00
|
387. Active Wormhole Alliance? - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
You'll find alliances doing WH stuff, but not because you need one. There is nothing about WH space which promotes or requires the creation of one. The only legit reasons are the same ones you find in high sec empire alliances: war evasion, more h...
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.07.13 19:11:00
|
388. Eve Economy = like starcraft - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The economy is broken because of agents, not anything related to moon mining. Despite how you may feel about T2 and material prices. Creating depletable moons that run out and respawn with new materials is a critical component of 0.0 overhaul, bu...
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.07.13 19:07:00
|
389. What is the worst thing to call somebody in eve? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Carebear is probably the most insulting word that doesn't rely on knowing any real life information about the person being insulted. It attacks their credibility as a player and as a human being. Unfortunately, 9 out of 10 people think its a cute...
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.07.13 19:03:00
|
390. Why does... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The garbled mess you referred to with a cute analogy is part of the normal map. You see it on ship parts with a lot of detail because the quality of the map isn't sufficient enough to deal with tiny edges like on the engines. They can't selectiv...
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.07.13 18:59:00
|
391. Why General Discussion isn't very good for actual discussion - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
wat.
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.07.13 18:46:00
|
392. New Dev Blog: War is a full time job - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
MORE POWER CREEP, HELLZ YEAH . WTB Faction 800 Charges Also, the better fix would've been to ban non-FW peeps from using faction ships in their respective territories. ie. treat it like contraband where the navy tries to gank you.
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.07.13 18:39:00
|
393. ôEVE for Dummiesö a guide to ingame doÆs & Donts. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
There is a metric asston of information out there. Everything you can ever do in every possible way has been done, disseminated, encapsulated, vacuum sealed, digested, regurgitated and fornicated a thousand times over. The reason why dummies are...
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.07.13 07:30:00
|
394. Why General Discussion isn't very good for actual discussion - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: stoicfaux Color me shocked. You just now realized that Eve players hold bacon in higher regard and importance than your opinions? Well, if we're talking about the crispy kind you let simmer on a George Foreman grill, the...
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.07.13 07:24:00
|
395. Future of null-sec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Hirana Yoshida Awesome post, thank you. And no I do not have the whole history only from RMR onwards which is when I joined. But even with the full story I do not see anything that would go against what I concluded; that to...
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.07.13 07:20:00
|
396. Proper use of the term "class" in deep space Sci-Fi? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'd prefer hearing the second one, if you absolutely have to sound like a total douche on TS.
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.07.12 21:13:00
|
397. Why General Discussion isn't very good for actual discussion - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
A day late is totally fine. Whatever previous complaint thread existed is now being digested in the bowels of eve-online.com, aka page 2. ^_^
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.07.12 21:11:00
|
398. ETA On New Forums - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Forums suck hard, but they're functional in a very basic way. Replacing it would be great for us, but not as a selling point for EVE marketing. You've been around long enough to know the likelihood of seeing substantial improvements are somewhere...
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.07.12 21:01:00
|
399. Probed down but no combat probes in sight - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It's been a while since I actually lol'ed at a thread title. Thanks..?
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.07.12 20:57:00
|
400. Future of null-sec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Good question. If you got $15 to spare , let us know too.
- by DigitalCommunist - at 2009.07.12 20:55:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |