Pages: [1] |
1. SCL website - a bit of a shambles? - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
I'm not in a position to play Eve at the moment but have been trying to follow the developments of the SCL4 after I heard my alliance was involved in it. As far as I'm aware the SCL website is here , but looking at it there doesn't seem to be mu...
- by Durzel - at 2013.09.15 13:24:00
|
2. Duality Open - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Do the usual rules of conquerable stations & sovereignty apply on Duality? (bored, and killing time before next practice)
- by Durzel - at 2013.08.01 00:46:00
|
3. DOMI-nating - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
In this years tournament, with this years rules? Absolutely. Welcome to the meta cake, son.
- by Durzel - at 2013.07.25 17:57:00
|
4. DOMI-nating - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Harvey James wrote: Garviel Tarrant wrote: Harvey James wrote: CCP Rise wrote: I'm glad we have banning to keep the meta moving, definitely not good for something too be too dominant. However, I disagree about boring. Back in my day we...
- by Durzel - at 2013.07.25 17:44:00
|
5. Legacy overloaded ASB eligibility for the ATXI - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Psihius wrote: Well, a little clarification on what is meant by overloaded ASB's would be helpful for those of us, who don't know what the hell it is about? o.O Short version: When ASBs came out they allowed a certain number of charges. CCP ...
- by Durzel - at 2013.07.08 13:35:00
|
6. FF tourney 2013 - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
What did surprise me, and I don't suppose it matters much now, is how easy it was to see what your opponents were fitting. I know CCP made attempts to stop people walking around to the other side, but it was so busy I doubt it was very stringent. ...
- by Durzel - at 2013.04.30 16:58:00
|
7. FF tourney 2013 - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Cas Mania wrote: The ten minute speed fit was the most intense part of the March. You had to have a plan, know how to fit ships, and remember everything. That takes skill, and I am disappointed that it got downplayed in the commentary. Everyone...
- by Durzel - at 2013.04.30 12:05:00
|
8. Ancillary Shield Booster use should be nerfed - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Dez Affinity wrote: Durzel wrote: I keep reading this. Why are you talking about ASBs like they are a direct replacement for vanilla shield boosters? Granted while an ASB (or two) has charges it is formidable, but that is exactly why it w...
- by Durzel - at 2012.07.23 15:21:00
|
9. Ancillary Shield Booster use should be nerfed - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Lexa Hellfury wrote: I really don't understand why CCP thought adding more tank to the game was a good idea. People keep talking about how it's a buff to solo/small gang (<5) PvP, which is not the case at all. It limits solo PvP/small ga...
- by Durzel - at 2012.07.23 14:37:00
|
10. Ancillary Shield Booster use should be nerfed - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
I like what ASBs added to the game, less so for the Alliance Tournament. The fact there was an arbitrary restriction on the number you were allowed to fit speaks volumes. That being said prior to ASB there was barely any reason not to default to ...
- by Durzel - at 2012.07.23 09:39:00
|
11. [Suggestion to CCP] Please fund EveTV --- pleaswe sign if you agree - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Just to add to this, I saw part of an episode of Eve TV (it may have actually been on television here in the UK, I can't remember for sure) and it was a good incentive to try the game out. I don't think I would've bothered otherwise.
- by Durzel - at 2008.02.03 21:05:00
|
Pages: [1] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |