| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. ETC reactivation account - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Go here: Timecode Bazar And read the sticks. ===== "If a member of the EVE community finds he or she cannot accept our current level of transparency, we bid you good luck in finding a company that meets your needs." - CCP kieron...
- by Etho Demerzel - at 2009.01.10 17:08:00
|
2. Bug or feature? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Ranger 1 Originally by: Netacq Originally by: Killer Gandry Please do not post GM correspondence. Navigator Hmm, and in 4 year we will know: it was an exploit and the GMs did force the abuse... ...
- by Etho Demerzel - at 2008.12.13 16:46:00
|
3. Honestly Im pretty weary of exploits and CCPs good buddy BOB. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Ima Alt BoB are dev alts. They play and enjoy Eve and just like everyone else, they don't like to lose. It's a reality of the Eve universe and there's nothing you can do about it except quit if it bothers you a bunch. The re...
- by Etho Demerzel - at 2008.12.10 23:06:00
|
4. Orca with Ore Compression. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Artemis Rose As somebody who doesn't mine and really just wants a mini-freighter, I could careless what it does with ore . An advise, buy a full freighter. If the only thing you want is to haul, forget the Orca. ===== ...
- by Etho Demerzel - at 2008.10.26 03:17:00
|
5. 37000 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Chaos Incarnate Originally by: Dianeces Or, ya know, they could be playing with whatever subscription time they have left. I know I personally have just under two months left. Why would you still bother playing i...
- by Etho Demerzel - at 2008.10.20 01:27:00
|
6. Will the amount of Ragequitters about to leave Eve-O - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Etho Demerzel on 14/10/2008 16:56:40 Originally by: Malcanis IIRC CCP had already internally disciplined him when the storm broke, and by Icelandic employment law they were absolutely constrained from taking any further acti...
- by Etho Demerzel - at 2008.10.14 16:54:00
|
7. Will the amount of Ragequitters about to leave Eve-O - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Etho Demerzel on 14/10/2008 16:54:47 Originally by: Sheriff Jones Umm, unintended feature means a "side effect that isn't necessarily harmful". And which is ADVERTISED in a game guide. So an INTENDED feature. UNINTENDED ...
- by Etho Demerzel - at 2008.10.14 16:50:00
|
8. Will the amount of Ragequitters about to leave Eve-O - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Sheriff Jones t20 was fair enough, but it was handled, and new things put into place to prevent it. Wasn't CCP, was an individual. Considering he still works on CCP after all this, no it was not an individual, it was C...
- by Etho Demerzel - at 2008.10.14 16:45:00
|
9. People's whiplash to Tech 2 BPOs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Kransthow First of all how is my analogy incorrect? I love it when people just glaze over and just say ITS WRONG without listing the specifics. All analogies are incorrect, including mine. No two things are equal and to...
- by Etho Demerzel - at 2008.10.09 08:01:00
|
10. People's whiplash to Tech 2 BPOs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Venkul Mul The list is a bit old, but they don't seem to be "very few". named items better than T2 Some have been corrected in the last year, but no more than a 10% of that list. If you READ the list you will see th...
- by Etho Demerzel - at 2008.10.09 07:10:00
|
11. People's whiplash to Tech 2 BPOs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Etho Demerzel on 09/10/2008 06:13:18 Originally by: Barbicane If CCP were to remove T2 BPOs, I for one would suck it up, adapt and move on, provided they had a good reason for the removal. They did have rather good reasons ...
- by Etho Demerzel - at 2008.10.09 06:13:00
|
12. People's whiplash to Tech 2 BPOs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Etho Demerzel on 09/10/2008 06:14:02 Originally by: Venkul Mul [ You are forgetting the little fact that those items are competing against high metalevel named items and low level faction items. Look the T2 plates and the ...
- by Etho Demerzel - at 2008.10.09 06:09:00
|
13. People's whiplash to Tech 2 BPOs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Kransthow Originally by: Catherine Frasier Originally by: Kransthow Should your neighbour have his winnings removed? No. Originally by: Catherine Frasier Originally by: Kransthow Should...
- by Etho Demerzel - at 2008.10.09 05:11:00
|
14. People's whiplash to Tech 2 BPOs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: Some of your arguments are ridiculous and you should rightly abandon the following things that simply cannot be true, given the current status quo. One: Invention can stabilize the markets of low-demand specialty items. This cannot...
- by Etho Demerzel - at 2008.10.09 04:56:00
|
15. People's whiplash to Tech 2 BPOs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Etho Demerzel on 09/10/2008 04:56:30 Originally by: Makhan Not good enough, your entire argument hinged on the fact that inventors would stabilize the market at equilibrium, where ships across all races are equal, as you ca...
- by Etho Demerzel - at 2008.10.09 04:51:00
|
16. People's whiplash to Tech 2 BPOs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Makhan Bullshit, pure and simple, one has but to look to kador and the void to see pathetic and weak markets, my goods sell almost just as fast in Tash prime as they do in Amarr, and at better prices. Do you even live in Am...
- by Etho Demerzel - at 2008.10.09 01:32:00
|
17. People's whiplash to Tech 2 BPOs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Etho Demerzel on 08/10/2008 23:02:06 Originally by: Avon Define unfair? Some people invest 10's of billions of ISK on BPO's with 4 or 5yr roi's. Unfair would be removing them because you don't want to invest, the advantage...
- by Etho Demerzel - at 2008.10.08 23:01:00
|
18. People's whiplash to Tech 2 BPOs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Makhan Tash-Murkon is not a "weak" market, it's the second most active market in Amarr space. Yes, Tash-Murkon is a pathetic and weak market. Quote: Even in Amarr itself prices on the ships fluctuate wildly. A c...
- by Etho Demerzel - at 2008.10.08 22:55:00
|
19. People's whiplash to Tech 2 BPOs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Avon Except you can't do that. It takes longer to per run to copy a T2 BPO than it does to produce the item, precisely to prevent what you describe. You could that for ammo for a long time and you still can for hybrids....
- by Etho Demerzel - at 2008.10.08 22:14:00
|
20. People's whiplash to Tech 2 BPOs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Venkul Mul Because the ship is perceived as having lesser quality and so people is willing to pay less, not because of BPO. As I explained that is not true. With invention offer is as flexible as demand. If prices star...
- by Etho Demerzel - at 2008.10.08 21:58:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |