Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 |
101. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: 40 minute capture time. i see you're not actually leaving, but there are virtually no systems with 40 minute capture time. 27.5m is the maximum you'll see except for the rare mining system. more to the point though, all you...
- by EvilweaselFinance - at 2015.03.09 21:29:39
|
102. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: I'm out - was glad dismantling you today, look forward to doing it again in 3 months :) post type 4, potato word salad
- by EvilweaselFinance - at 2015.03.09 21:24:51
|
103. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
PotatoOverdose wrote: EvilweaselFinance wrote: post type 3: lets turn this entire game into a bore-off Post type 4: Cycling my damps once is too boring!!! I'll throw in another one free of charge: Post type 5: Grrrrrrr In-terrr-sep-torrr...
- by EvilweaselFinance - at 2015.03.09 21:18:52
|
104. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Ranger 1 wrote: EvilweaselFinance wrote: M1k3y Koontz wrote: 45 DPS at 124km, your interceptor is dead in under a minute (55.5 seconds, yes I did the math) It's also a fifth the cost. Your move. Also, yes it has remote sebos. If you...
- by EvilweaselFinance - at 2015.03.09 21:15:50
|
105. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
PotatoOverdose wrote: Idk what any alliance is planning, but the fact that their interceptors scarred you lot for life is hilarious. i suppose i need to add post type 4: "im tired of getting beaten like a rented mule so im going to jus...
- by EvilweaselFinance - at 2015.03.09 21:12:49
|
106. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
PotatoOverdose wrote: Interceptor has another 40 minute timer in which his sov lazor gets damped. It's like you are fundamentally unable to concieve of a situation where an interceptor won't waste 40 minutes after 40 minutes of his life in a ...
- by EvilweaselFinance - at 2015.03.09 21:10:50
|
107. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
MASSADEATH wrote: UNFUN? undoing all of CFC and goon sov.... while endlessly sov trolling your area of influence into smaller and smaller chunks? while collecting all the goon PVE tears? well i mean you've already admitted there's no chanc...
- by EvilweaselFinance - at 2015.03.09 21:08:30
|
108. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
M1k3y Koontz wrote: 45 DPS at 124km, your interceptor is dead in under a minute (55.5 seconds, yes I did the math) It's also a fifth the cost. Your move. Also, yes it has remote sebos. If you can't get two guys together to defend your spa...
- by EvilweaselFinance - at 2015.03.09 21:01:45
|
109. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
i mean really, everyone arguing in favor of trollceptors is doing one of the following: 1) we should get to contest sov risk-free, because its not fair i don't have a sov system and i never will have one if my ships might blow up 2) i do not und...
- by EvilweaselFinance - at 2015.03.09 21:00:55
|
110. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Acuma wrote: It seems like the goons story is going from "It's overpowered and we'll burn down null with trollceptors" to "it's a boring stalemate where the attacker wastes a ton of time compared to the defender and we don't like it." Is that a...
- by EvilweaselFinance - at 2015.03.09 20:56:06
|
111. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
PotatoOverdose wrote: Putting damps on someone is as un-fun as pointing someone. Nice Try. If the limit of your argument is "I find it boring to apply an ewar module to someone for a cycle," well .... it's good to see you have no arguments. ...
- by EvilweaselFinance - at 2015.03.09 20:53:14
|
112. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Veskrashen wrote: There's been dozens of ways to kill it already presented on this very thread. Your response has generally amounted to "Nuh Uh!!!" no, the response has universally been "that is a stupid way that does not work in practice f...
- by EvilweaselFinance - at 2015.03.09 20:49:41
|
113. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
SilentAsTheGrave wrote: EvilweaselFinance wrote: SilentAsTheGrave wrote: Paying the pilots from the war chest to be active in these systems is out of the question? why would we want the game to reward unfun bore-offs where you have to ...
- by EvilweaselFinance - at 2015.03.09 20:48:42
|
114. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
PotatoOverdose wrote: How is a maulus putting damps on an inty for 1 cycle a bore off? you are doing an unfun activity where neither can affect the other except by refusing to be bored into logging out that is the definition of a bore-off ...
- by EvilweaselFinance - at 2015.03.09 20:46:57
|
115. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Nope, I didn't say that at all. Personally I'd use a stealth bomber with rockets though rather than these long range fits. Different folks, different strokes and all that. there are a million ways to fail to scratch the pai...
- by EvilweaselFinance - at 2015.03.09 20:44:51
|
116. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
PotatoOverdose wrote: Ceptor orbits structure for 30 minutes. Maulus comes by, damps it to hell, leaves. Ceptor's got another 40 minutes to go. Done. yes, a bore-off thank you for conceding you were wrong
- by EvilweaselFinance - at 2015.03.09 20:43:59
|
117. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: unfortunately for you they are objectively correct Please remind me how your 42 minutes orbitting a structure in your trollceptor isn't undone by 12 minutes of me in a maulus? Oh right, we wrecked ...
- by EvilweaselFinance - at 2015.03.09 20:43:02
|
118. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
PotatoOverdose wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: unfortunately for you they are objectively correct Prove it. Obligatory: Grrrrrrr In-terrr-sep-torrrrrrrr, Grrrrrrrr. we have you can look at our posts, or you can look at yours: either...
- by EvilweaselFinance - at 2015.03.09 20:41:49
|
119. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
PotatoOverdose wrote: And your stubborn claim that everyone shares your particular views of "Grrrrrrr In-terrr-sep-torrrrrrrr, Grrrrrrrr," or that those views are correct, make for humorous reading material. my claim is backed up by unrefute...
- by EvilweaselFinance - at 2015.03.09 20:40:06
|
120. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
SilentAsTheGrave wrote: Paying the pilots from the war chest to be active in these systems is out of the question? why would we want the game to reward unfun bore-offs where you have to pay people to play the game
- by EvilweaselFinance - at 2015.03.09 20:34:16
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |