Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 |
381. Low population in low sec confirmed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Exlegion on 20/02/2008 19:25:49 Originally by: Rawr Cristina Originally by: Exlegion From experience I can tell you that when I run missions in low sec I am constantly being interrupted. Sometimes it will take me ...
- by Exlegion - at 2008.02.20 19:23:00
|
382. Low population in low sec confirmed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Exlegion on 20/02/2008 19:04:17 Originally by: L70Rogue Originally by: Marcus TheMartin Originally by: Tank CEO Move all Lvl 4 + 5 Agents to low sec . Move all research agents to low sec. Put better npcs in ...
- by Exlegion - at 2008.02.20 19:02:00
|
383. Low population in low sec confirmed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Exlegion on 20/02/2008 18:46:20 Moving level 4 missions into low sec isn't the solution. You first need to understand that the problem with low sec is that basing most operations there, especially mining and missioning, means operat...
- by Exlegion - at 2008.02.20 18:41:00
|
384. Korthan - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Wow, so young. I'm very sorry to hear that. He and his family will be in my prayers today. One of us equals many of us. Disrespect one of us, you'll see plenty of us. - Gang Starr
- by Exlegion - at 2008.02.20 16:03:00
|
385. How to avoid being probed while doing a mission ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Lil'Red Ridin'Hood Regarding 2) Quote: Target Signal Size = Target Signature Radius / Target Sensor Strength From the ship probing guide. The lower your signal size, the harder it is to get probed out. Has this ...
- by Exlegion - at 2008.02.20 12:30:00
|
386. Zulupark Good Man - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Damn, very nice indeed . Congrats to all Amarr flyers (assuming all these changes go through). One of us equals many of us. Disrespect one of us, you'll see plenty of us. - Guru
- by Exlegion - at 2008.02.01 20:53:00
|
387. Is it fair that some players subsidize other players gameplay? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Admiral Pelleon Originally by: Tarminic So what, exactly, is the entire point of this post? After consulting with my board of directors we have determined that the OP is an idiot and does not understand basic eco...
- by Exlegion - at 2008.01.29 23:44:00
|
388. Is it fair that some players subsidize other players gameplay? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: K'dararle This system is PARTICULARLY unfair since it is only the fact of stuff getting blown up that drives the EVE economy Wait. What? One of us equals many of us. Disrespect one of us, you'll see plenty of us. ...
- by Exlegion - at 2008.01.29 21:34:00
|
389. HIC ??? is balance gone again now? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Exlegion on 27/01/2008 00:22:33 Originally by: Malken if brain is connected you will have 100% chance of escaping. if not then well you deserve to be screwed over tbh I love these comments. In fact, what do we need coun...
- by Exlegion - at 2008.01.27 00:21:00
|
390. GETTING RID OF THOSE PESKY STATION CONTAINERS - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Exlegion on 17/01/2008 23:52:15 Wait... You can't get rid of station containers? I've bought tons of those everywhere . You can't melt them or destroy them? Damn, I was planning on doing my spring cleaning by moving everything to ...
- by Exlegion - at 2008.01.17 23:49:00
|
391. What happened to risk vs reward? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Paulo Damarr Originally by: Thornat I think his point was that there is not enough motivation to PvP because their is little in it for players. I mean you blow a guy up and you might get 5% of his stuff in a contain...
- by Exlegion - at 2008.01.04 20:33:00
|
392. actually mining IS AN ISK FAUCET!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Frug Originally by: Richard Phallus Originally by: Vito Parabellum Mining is a indirect isk faucet. Argue definitions all night long but at the end of the (mining) day, there's new isk in the economy. /H...
- by Exlegion - at 2008.01.02 21:16:00
|
393. actually mining IS AN ISK FAUCET!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mining itself is neither an isk sink or faucet. But it does create deflation since it does add material into the system. More material at zero change in isk means isk gains vaule. One of us equals many of us. Disrespect one of us, you'll see...
- by Exlegion - at 2008.01.02 20:00:00
|
394. probes no longer visible on the directional scanner? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: techzer0 Originally by: Exlegion It would be nice if we could get more options to customize the built-in scanner when searching for specifics, such as probes, ships, etc, rather than having to go through the same ju...
- by Exlegion - at 2008.01.02 15:45:00
|
395. probes no longer visible on the directional scanner? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It would be nice if we could get more options to customize the built-in scanner when searching for specifics, such as probes, ships, etc, rather than having to go through the same junk over again every 15 to 30 seconds. To be fair, they did imp...
- by Exlegion - at 2008.01.02 15:32:00
|
396. a dilemma and i NEED YOUR HELP!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Complex Potential Edited by: Complex Potential on 31/12/2007 14:34:37 What exactly is wrong with marrying a girl like that? You thought she was hot right? So wait until you're married and you can have her as much as you ...
- by Exlegion - at 2007.12.31 14:59:00
|
397. Heavy Interdictors in Lowsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Exlegion on 31/12/2007 14:53:17 Honestly, to those complaining about HAC's stop making runs to low sec. Eventually the same pilots using these ships in gate camps will come to the forums to request CCP do something about bringing ta...
- by Exlegion - at 2007.12.31 14:53:00
|
398. a dilemma and i NEED YOUR HELP!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Assuming this is true and it is your baby, then as Denzel Washington would say, man the **** up . Take responsibility for your actions. The fact is, and whether you like it or not, you are now directly responsible for a human being other than you...
- by Exlegion - at 2007.12.31 14:14:00
|
399. imune exploit - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ki An, The only way it'd be an exploit is if corps are actually leaving an alliance 1 second after joining for the sole purpose of avoiding the war. As I said, *my* suggestion is to lock all corporations into the alliance for a week once they j...
- by Exlegion - at 2007.12.29 22:25:00
|
400. imune exploit - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Exlegion on 29/12/2007 20:14:06 Originally by: Ki An First, you can't really base a mechanic on the hope that enough pvp corps join so that everyone will be happy in the end. It seldom works out that way. You need rules that...
- by Exlegion - at 2007.12.29 20:08:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |