Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 |
41. [Issue] Attn CSMs: Combat Probes + Directional Scanner Loophole - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
And remember that pre-Apoc it took time placing the probes in place. At least it took more than just 5 seconds. Scanner for mission runners is now crap. It doesn't help unless you're spamming it every 5 seconds. One of us equals many of us. Di...
- by Exlegion - at 2009.07.17 02:43:00
|
42. [Issue] Attn CSMs: Combat Probes + Directional Scanner Loophole - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
It's not the same. In one scenario I'm still able to mission as long as I'm careful and watching my onboard scanner. Post-Apocrypha I cannot take that risk, my scanner is unreliable. One situation I can still make isk. On another situation I can'...
- by Exlegion - at 2009.07.17 02:41:00
|
43. [Issue] Attn CSMs: Combat Probes + Directional Scanner Loophole - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Hairy Sue Lowsec is tougher then highsec, and rightly so. Its about surviving, and is in fact very easy to do. Its not about risk free isk - if that is what you want go to high sec. I don't just want to survive in low sec...
- by Exlegion - at 2009.07.17 02:12:00
|
44. [Issue] Attn CSMs: Combat Probes + Directional Scanner Loophole - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Difference between two systems. Pre-Apocrypha: I could still mission even with neutrals and pirates in the system as long as probes were not visible on my scanner, because there was a reasonable probability that I wasn't being scanned. Post-Apoc...
- by Exlegion - at 2009.07.17 02:07:00
|
45. [Issue] Attn CSMs: Combat Probes + Directional Scanner Loophole - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Hairy Sue Its easy, with practice, to make yourself pretty much totally safe whilst running missions in lowsec. Briefly, its to do with aligning your ship, watching local, and using the scanner. I wont go into details here b...
- by Exlegion - at 2009.07.16 23:10:00
|
46. [Issue] Attn CSMs: Combat Probes + Directional Scanner Loophole - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: ChinaWillGrowLarger People have been using the D-Scanner in this manner since before the latest probe re-vamp; and were doing so when it was chance based even before that! This is what the D-Scanner is for. There is on...
- by Exlegion - at 2009.07.16 23:05:00
|
47. [Issue] Attn CSMs: Combat Probes + Directional Scanner Loophole - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Tortugan So uh... quick question: Why the hell does it matter if someone's scanning you down if you're already aligned out? The moment you see a hostile on grid, you have about a 3 second window to **** yourself and press wa...
- by Exlegion - at 2009.07.16 11:19:00
|
48. [Issue] Attn CSMs: Combat Probes + Directional Scanner Loophole - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: Exlegion on 15/07/2009 11:27:00 CommanderData211, I haven't done a good job explaining how changing the probing mechanics would improve profitability. But in a nutshell here it is: Pre-Apocrypha - I could mission in low sec even w...
- by Exlegion - at 2009.07.15 11:20:00
|
49. [Issue] Attn CSMs: Combat Probes + Directional Scanner Loophole - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Thanks, Marlona Sky. It's comforting to see you recognize there is a problem, even if we may not have a solution for it. It's certainly a break from the usual spam of "STOP BEING LAZY!1!", "GREEDY CAREBEAR!1!", "GO BACK TO HI SEC LULZ!1!". Anyway...
- by Exlegion - at 2009.07.14 22:31:00
|
50. [Issue] Attn CSMs: Combat Probes + Directional Scanner Loophole - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Santiago, My concern isn't just staying alive in low sec. I've already said it numerous times but we keep going in circles. I not only want to extend my survivability in low sec. I want to profit in low sec! YES, I CAN ALIGN AND WARP OUT WHEN MY...
- by Exlegion - at 2009.07.14 22:09:00
|
51. [Issue] Attn CSMs: Combat Probes + Directional Scanner Loophole - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: Exlegion on 14/07/2009 20:25:01 Originally by: Myra2007 Exlegion confirmed here that it is indeed "easy" to survive missioning in lowsec without pressing the scan button 12 times per minute. I think we can safely assume th...
- by Exlegion - at 2009.07.14 20:25:00
|
52. [Issue] Attn CSMs: Combat Probes + Directional Scanner Loophole - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Currently there is a technique being used in low sec to probe mission runners which circumvents the steps required to properly probe someone down. Combat probes are supposed to be used to probe ships. This isnĘt the case. Players are learning to u...
- by Exlegion - at 2009.07.12 15:12:00
|
53. [ISSUE] Add probes to the overview. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: Exlegion on 11/07/2009 23:24:41 If a CSM could comment on what I have typed below I would really appreciate it. I'm afraid to say it but the problem is actually graver than the fix being proposed can manage. Even if this fix goes t...
- by Exlegion - at 2009.07.11 23:21:00
|
54. [Issue] The new L4 Agents - Wrong Approach - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Leandro Salazar You are prolly too politically correct to write or even realize this, but the (sad?) truth is that most people run for Caldari rather than other factions because most people are lazy, unimaginative, plain st...
- by Exlegion - at 2009.06.01 22:51:00
|
55. Give the option to use the old fitting screen - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
The new fitting screen looks great, actually. It's a welcome change from my part. One of us equals many of us. Disrespect one of us, you'll see plenty of us. - Gang Starr
- by Exlegion - at 2009.02.12 12:24:00
|
56. [Idea]Necroing a dear old subject of mine (it's that time of year) - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Good read, my friend.
- by Exlegion - at 2009.01.31 15:57:00
|
57. [Issue] Mission Reset Exploit - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: Exlegion on 20/01/2009 21:55:41 I'm all for this fix as long as EVERYONE in deadspace shares NPC aggro. It's way too easy for a loot thief to roam about the mission freely while the mission runner himself is aggroed by 30+ NPCs, w...
- by Exlegion - at 2009.01.20 21:31:00
|
58. Should CSM members resign? - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Ephemeron Edited by: Ephemeron on 17/12/2008 22:35:07 Originally by: Drake Draconis I gotta ask.... IF you people really hate it that much... then why are you still paying them money? That's kind of like, if yo...
- by Exlegion - at 2008.12.18 00:20:00
|
59. Should CSM members resign? - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
fuze, Now here's a post worth discussing! Unfortunately, I'm heading out the door and to work. But I'll get back to your response, as it is a great post. One of us equals many of us. Disrespect one of us, you'll see plenty of us. - Gang S...
- by Exlegion - at 2008.12.17 13:05:00
|
60. Should CSM members resign? - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Etho, This isn't a call for any of us to make, not the CSM, not you, not me, especially considering it will do NO GOOD releasing names of characters. The harm has already been done. If you're genuinely interested in helping, provide this thread ...
- by Exlegion - at 2008.12.17 12:33:00
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |