Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
41. [March] Balance Tweaks: Focused Warp Scrambling Script - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Kagi Anzomi wrote: FT Diomedes wrote: What this will really do is make HIC's less effective versus Capitals and Supercapitals. Might as well delete them since Interdictors are already better at that role anyway. As much as I hate the prop...
- by FT Diomedes - at 2017.02.28 11:09:48
|
42. [March] Balance Tweaks: Focused Warp Scrambling Script - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Stitch, Medium neutralizers are part of the discussion because Suitonia and others have expressed a preference for 15km scram range. That's pretty close. Also, not everyone is solo. Surely any non-suicidal pilot has friends who can come in close...
- by FT Diomedes - at 2017.02.27 23:06:07
|
43. [March] Balance Tweaks: Focused Warp Scrambling Script - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Ugly Eric wrote: The 21km scram is good for faction. Then the hic has to be within heavy neut optimal and within extreme ranges of grappler. The 37.* scram is just too powerful to such strong tank and strong DPS. Compare the scram range to a mo...
- by FT Diomedes - at 2017.02.27 22:32:06
|
44. [March] Balance Tweaks: Focused Warp Scrambling Script - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Daide Vondrichnov wrote: FT Diomedes wrote: Please show me where competent kiting gangs are regularly getting destroyed by just HIC's. They are not. I assure you that Exodus and The Culture don't die to just HIC's. It's just one group of ri...
- by FT Diomedes - at 2017.02.26 20:25:49
|
45. [March] Balance Tweaks: Focused Warp Scrambling Script - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Suitonia wrote: Trajan Unknown wrote: Ok, I will give up on this. It was partly a nice discussion and some good input but overall it just feels like people want to buff the smallgang warfare without any need for it. I enjoy smallgang/BLOPs a...
- by FT Diomedes - at 2017.02.26 18:30:03
|
46. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Bronson Hughes wrote: FT Diomedes wrote: A properly-fit Rorqual can tank very well for long enough for help to arrive, without PANIC module. I watched one tank 30 Gilas for 15 minutes while we formed a leisurely response fleet to come save h...
- by FT Diomedes - at 2017.02.26 16:28:40
|
47. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Mistress Renegade wrote: To solve the problems stated by CCP over the PANIC mode on Rorq's, why not just get rid of it all together. This solves the problem of invulnerable tackle, entosos or combat cyno etc. To compensate for this make the in...
- by FT Diomedes - at 2017.02.26 14:40:24
|
48. [March] Balance Tweaks: Focused Warp Scrambling Script - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Ugly Eric wrote: Trajan Unknown wrote: Grookshank wrote: Trajan Unknown wrote: Can we please, once and for all stop saying "40km scram"? It is 37.5km with max skills and t2 focus point. Stop looking dumb because you speak of 39.5/40km ...
- by FT Diomedes - at 2017.02.26 13:54:25
|
49. [March] Balance Tweaks: Focused Warp Scrambling Script - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Trajan Unknown wrote: Ugly Eric wrote: Too many ppl to quote, so i wont. To yall concidering why we kiters dont use lach instead of hic: Is a complicated reason. First off the simple stuff. While hic mobility is lower than lach, it still i...
- by FT Diomedes - at 2017.02.26 13:47:19
|
50. [March] Balance Tweaks: Focused Warp Scrambling Script - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Captain jdd wrote: FT Diomedes wrote: So you are admitting that the Keres and Orthrus are overpowered? Thanks. When your best answer is bring the very ships that are the problem, then you need to reevaluate your argument. Absolutely not. ...
- by FT Diomedes - at 2017.02.26 13:38:55
|
51. [March] Balance Tweaks: Focused Warp Scrambling Script - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Stitch Kaneland wrote: I don't see a reason why you NEED 30-40km scram on a ship, plus 100k+ EHP. Why can't you bring a huginn+keres/arazu to catch kiters? I've fought you guys a lot, you're not exactly lacking on guys to put in ships. HIC's ...
- by FT Diomedes - at 2017.02.26 13:34:46
|
52. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Lexia Nova wrote: Balancing mining.... are you having a laugh? Why on earth do you need to spread out ores in sites even more? Its already difficult enough getting everyone close enough for boosting (as rocks die off). Not all of us have rorq's...
- by FT Diomedes - at 2017.02.25 01:41:35
|
53. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: Goborn wrote: According to my best knowledge the Rorq's mining yield has now been nerfed by 58% Your math is off. The paper yield got chopped by 25% once, then that remaining 75% got chopped by 25%, which leaves yo...
- by FT Diomedes - at 2017.02.25 01:32:20
|
54. [March] Balance Tweaks: Focused Warp Scrambling Script - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Captain jdd wrote: FT Diomedes wrote: Stitch, you know I respect you, but the vitality of solo battecruisers or battleships is not a good thing to balance an entire ship class around. HIC's are not the cancer here. It's the Orthrus, Omen Nav...
- by FT Diomedes - at 2017.02.25 00:23:16
|
55. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
CCP Fozzie wrote: Jura McBain wrote: 2 hulks 600M 1 Rorq 12B. Now ,what is the point of mining whit rorqs? There has always been a premium for more powerful ships and abilities in EVE. As power increases, cost increases faster. We'll...
- by FT Diomedes - at 2017.02.24 22:06:25
|
56. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
CCP Fozzie wrote: Hey everyone. Thanks for the passionate feedback so far! I'm going to go through a bit of Q&A from the thread so far, but first let's spend a little time diving into the specifics of the proposed PANIC module changes: Th...
- by FT Diomedes - at 2017.02.24 21:40:08
|
57. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Rowells wrote: CCP Fozzie wrote: We're confident that Post-March Rorquals will still be vastly more powerful than they were pre-Ascension. TBH that's not saying much. That's not saying anything.
- by FT Diomedes - at 2017.02.24 21:33:51
|
58. [March] Balance Tweaks: Focused Warp Scrambling Script - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Stitch Kaneland wrote: Solaris Vex wrote: Cade Windstalker wrote: Doesn't matter if most people didn't have the max range, before this you still easily got a significantly higher Scram range with a HIC than you could with a focused EWar...
- by FT Diomedes - at 2017.02.24 21:28:17
|
59. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Oberon Altair wrote: What's the point of a 10 billion + investment for a ship and even more for a character if you can make the same amount now in a carrier which can be nearly fully insured and 1/5th of the cost or AGAIN NEARLY RUNNING INCURSI...
- by FT Diomedes - at 2017.02.24 12:26:52
|
60. Sticky:[March] Balance Tweaks: Fighters, Supercarriers & Burst Proj... - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Terrible changes. You have Carriers out in space doing things that require active input and attention, so you decide to nerf that activity. This month it's like you had a focus group with the agenda "How can we make the smallest number of people h...
- by FT Diomedes - at 2017.02.24 12:22:25
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |