Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Disabling ghost training - the blog edition - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Catherine Frasier Originally by: Carsidava Please post proof that CCP considered this a bug (in those words) before yesterday's announcements. They have still not said that. They said "Ghost Training was an uninten...
- by Gajowy - at 2008.10.14 21:30:00
|
2. Disabling ghost training - the blog edition - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
http://www.eve-online.com/guide/en/g615.asp "Skills continue training even if you are logged off or if your account is inactive (in the second scenario you can't change skill training, though)." CCP THERE IS A BUG IN PLAYER GUIDE FROM OVER 5 YEAR...
- by Gajowy - at 2008.10.14 13:40:00
|
3. [ Vote]Saying ' No' to the end of so called 'Ghost Training' - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Well im not happy with this change, but it was rather predictable, island gone bankrupt and ccp is going to leech money from customers in every possible way
- by Gajowy - at 2008.10.14 13:10:00
|
4. Finish This Sentence... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
is Caldari FW pilot?
- by Gajowy - at 2008.08.03 11:49:00
|
5. [VOTE] All AGAINST The Nano-Nerf - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: pedros Im VOTE FOR the Nerf! damn 10k flyers Ok but if you want to support nerf post it in appropriate thread FS
- by Gajowy - at 2008.07.28 18:46:00
|
6. What is the point of HACs? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Peter Powers OMG an ishtar setup which permatanks above 500dps while dealing above 500dps!!!!!!! [Ishtar, Think Diffrent] Shield Power Relay II Shield Power Relay II Shield Power Relay II Shield Power Relay II Shield Power ...
- by Gajowy - at 2008.07.27 16:21:00
|
7. [VOTE] All FOR The Nano-Nerf - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Kieselmeister Edited by: Kieselmeister on 27/07/2008 15:37:29 Originally by: Gajowy high dps is balance to f*@& short range of blasters, so stop talking this b*@@(! about sacrificing dmg mods, blasterboats can s...
- by Gajowy - at 2008.07.27 15:39:00
|
8. [VOTE] All FOR The Nano-Nerf - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Kieselmeister Edited by: Kieselmeister on 27/07/2008 15:25:46 Edited by: Kieselmeister on 27/07/2008 15:24:57 the reason that they cant hit is because they are going for max DPS instead of tracking. If they were wil...
- by Gajowy - at 2008.07.27 15:33:00
|
9. Nerfed. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
to all nano whiners- fit heavy neuts, ive never been ganked by nanoship with this onboard
- by Gajowy - at 2008.07.27 14:43:00
|
10. What is the point of HACs? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
If you cant defend yourself against nano you dont deserve to play this game
- by Gajowy - at 2008.07.27 10:35:00
|
11. What is the point of HACs? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Gajowy on 27/07/2008 08:53:04 Originally by: Herateis Originally by: Upright Originally by: Ekrid this is a troll. HACs are tech two cruisers. That means they get more armor, resists, move slightly faster, a...
- by Gajowy - at 2008.07.27 08:52:00
|
12. [issue] Pre-Nerf Speculation should not be [issue]'s - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Windjammer People don't need to test all the specifics of the nano nerf as outlined in the dev blog. They can READ some of the amazingly bad ideas right there. It isn't even that people are specificly against reducing spee...
- by Gajowy - at 2008.07.26 20:32:00
|
13. Hallowed be thy CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
how funny that all posts by caldari hmm yeah nerfing all races but caldari= balance...
- by Gajowy - at 2008.07.26 18:42:00
|
14. [VOTE] All AGAINST The Nano-Nerf - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Arlenna Molatov I vote FOR THE change! And since when do we need votes on anything? If its a game balancing/breaking Issue I could give a rats ass- If I were the dev team- about any number of votes to either side. If I( t...
- by Gajowy - at 2008.07.26 18:13:00
|
15. [issue]turret vs missiles training times - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Yeah and why I cannot just train large blasters without learning small, medium and support skills, as you can do with torpedos?
- by Gajowy - at 2008.07.26 18:02:00
|
16. [issue]turret vs missiles training times - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Gypsio III Turrets are easier to train, you moron. Did you even look at the lengths of the missile and gunnery skill trees? Moron compare skill requirements of t2 siege launcher with for example large hybrid turret t2
- by Gajowy - at 2008.07.26 17:52:00
|
17. [VOTE] All FOR The Nano-Nerf - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: The PitBoss Edited by: The PitBoss on 26/07/2008 16:45:50 Originally by: Gajowy Yeah big support for people who dont know how to fight with nanos, and whine about it all the time! Why some high sp chars with lot...
- by Gajowy - at 2008.07.26 16:50:00
|
18. So.... did CCP look at how nerfing speed will nerf blaster and others? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
no everything is allright, faildari have their torpedoes untouched so there is no nerf at all, skill caldari. Your megathron cannot catch s*** oops sorry fit rails 300 dps is sooo good. Yeah blasters are short range and it is hard as it is now, b...
- by Gajowy - at 2008.07.26 16:43:00
|
19. [VOTE] All FOR The Nano-Nerf - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Yeah big support for people who dont know how to fight with nanos, and whine about it all the time! Why some high sp chars with lot of hard worked isk, and a lot of spended $ are better than 5m sp noobs! Remove pvp, make it mining game weeeee
- by Gajowy - at 2008.07.26 15:59:00
|
20. [VOTE] All AGAINST The Nano-Nerf - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
signed
- by Gajowy - at 2008.07.26 15:31:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |