Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 |
81. Black Ops - WInter Change?! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I don't necessarily agree that their combat capabilities should be buffed. The covops cloak I suppose could be considered a combat capability but not in the sense that it affects a fight directly once that fight has begun. Blops BS are already pre...
- by Ganthrithor - at 2011.11.10 19:12:00
|
82. Black Ops - WInter Change?! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
They should give them covops cloaks / no recal time just like bombers. It's not like it would be that "op," and it would make the ships more fun to fly in an on-grid combat role, mostly because it would allow you to slink around big systems to fin...
- by Ganthrithor - at 2011.11.10 15:00:00
|
83. Faction items seeded on Sisi - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I think what it basically comes down to is that they want to avoid spending time working on the test server when they're all busy making a new winter expansion. This I can sort of understand but just say this rather than giving some terrible argum...
- by Ganthrithor - at 2011.11.10 14:51:00
|
84. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Tier3 Battlecruisers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Daraja wrote: Ganthrithor wrote: I mean, you *can* counter the new BCs with cruisers... you just have to fly them precisely. I just lost a blaster Talos to a Celestis on sisi because it warped on on top of me and scrammed me-- no way to tr...
- by Ganthrithor - at 2011.11.09 10:21:00
|
85. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Tier3 Battlecruisers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Daraja wrote: Ganthrithor wrote: T1 cruisers have been more or less useless for a long ass time now. They're good for funny gimmicks and slosh ops and thats about it. How about instead of complaining you get excited about how there's goi...
- by Ganthrithor - at 2011.11.09 05:10:00
|
86. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Tier3 Battlecruisers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Daraja wrote: Number in [ ] is tier 2 BC speed. Talos 220 [145] Thorax 180 Tornado 225 [165] Rupture 192 Oracle 200 [150] Maller 164 Naga 195 [140] Moa 164 Why are Tier 3 BCs faster than the Tier 3 Cruisers? This means these new BCs wi...
- by Ganthrithor - at 2011.11.09 02:50:00
|
87. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Hybrid Turrets - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Blasters (larges and mediums especially) probably need more than a 5% tracking buff. They seriously struggle to track anything smaller than a titan when used inside their engagement envelope. Alternatively (and probably, optimally) increase their ...
- by Ganthrithor - at 2011.11.09 02:20:00
|
88. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Tier3 Battlecruisers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
The Talos really wants to be shieldtanked (since as a blasterboat it needs speed / agility). Swap a low for (preferably) 2 mids (one if you're feeling stingy)-- this will let it fit a minimal shield tank, plus a scram and a web, both of which it n...
- by Ganthrithor - at 2011.11.09 02:00:00
|
89. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Tier3 Battlecruisers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Pinky Denmark wrote: Ganth I mentioned some of the fastest and hardest hitting ships around with great possibilities of solo pvp in hostile territory and you still want something much faster and harder hitting? These are in my opinion proof tha...
- by Ganthrithor - at 2011.11.08 21:15:00
|
90. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Tier3 Battlecruisers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Pinky Denmark wrote: Ganthrithor wrote: finally there's a T1 ship I can buy for less than 200m that might actually be useful for PvP outside weird niche roles. Dude, you should look into Ruptures, Hurricanes, Typhoons and Tempests all ve...
- by Ganthrithor - at 2011.11.08 14:57:00
|
91. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Tier3 Battlecruisers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I can't believe how many people are howling for the nerfbat on the Tornado-- CCP finally puts a useful T1 ship in the game and people go bonkers about how it should be nerfed down to have an engagement range that it can't even track within? Really...
- by Ganthrithor - at 2011.11.08 14:27:00
|
92. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Tier3 Battlecruisers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
People who are whining about the new BCs being fast are dumb-- these ships have seriously minimal tank-- without speed they'd die incredibly quickly. They're going to be fairly dangerous to cruisers. Hint-- fight them with small ships (frigs) or b...
- by Ganthrithor - at 2011.11.08 03:45:00
|
93. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Tier3 Battlecruisers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Phantomania wrote: Ganthrithor wrote: Also I thought I'd mention that the Oracle and Tornado seem pretty spot-on in terms of ship handling / flying experience-- amazing offensive capabilities, easily wrecked if pilot error occurs. Brilliant....
- by Ganthrithor - at 2011.11.07 20:34:00
|
94. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Tier3 Battlecruisers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Also I thought I'd mention that the Oracle and Tornado seem pretty spot-on in terms of ship handling / flying experience-- amazing offensive capabilities, easily wrecked if pilot error occurs. Brilliant. The only thing I wonder about is whether or...
- by Ganthrithor - at 2011.11.07 20:05:00
|
95. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Tier3 Battlecruisers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP Ytterbium wrote: :words: I'm glad you guys are trying to work on blasters / Gallente ships. I'm gonna re-post a thing I posted https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=30214 re: how to fix Gallente / blasterboats: G...
- by Ganthrithor - at 2011.11.07 19:59:00
|
96. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Tier3 Battlecruisers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I spent a couple of hours on SiSi last night playing with the Oracle, Talos, and Tornado. The Oracle is an amazing scorch-sniper, the Tornado is fast as anything and an amazing skirmish ship with 800's-- as agile as a Vagabond, fast enough to outr...
- by Ganthrithor - at 2011.11.07 13:36:00
|
97. Blaster boats still suck - Armor tanking + Blasters fundamentally incompatible - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I spent a couple of hours on SiSi last night playing with the Oracle, Talos, and Tornado. The Oracle is an amazing scorch-sniper, the Tornado is fast as anything and an amazing skirmish ship with 800's-- as agile as a Vagabond, fast enough to outr...
- by Ganthrithor - at 2011.11.07 13:34:00
|
98. Blaster boats still suck - Armor tanking + Blasters fundamentally incompatible - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
MotherMoon wrote: remember mimatar ships do half the dps when in falloff range. I'm not saying blasters don't need more damage, but it needs t be balanced with range and speed mechanics. So do blasters, but ACs have 3x the falloff. Blaster...
- by Ganthrithor - at 2011.11.06 17:58:00
|
99. Blaster boats still suck - Armor tanking + Blasters fundamentally incompatible - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
tl;dr: Make all Gallente / blasterboats the second-fastest ships in the game, and the most agile. Give them bonuses to AB speed that allow them to do MWD-speeds using afterburners, thus rendering them scram-immune and suitable for closerange engag...
- by Ganthrithor - at 2011.11.06 03:28:00
|
100. Blaster boats still suck - Armor tanking + Blasters fundamentally incompatible - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Zagdul wrote: The reason Gallente / Blasters suck is that Minmatar are so good. Minmatar = They get speed + web bonus (on recons) + best weapon in the game that doesn't use cap... list goes on. Amarr = Tank like a boss, decent weapon system th...
- by Ganthrithor - at 2011.11.06 03:15:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |