| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] |
101. Blaster boats still suck - Armor tanking + Blasters fundamentally incompatible - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Jiji Hamin wrote: I like ship diversity, so i like the dps idea. sadly, right now, you need vigilant/vindicator damage bonuses plus bonused webs to be effective. I think all blasters should be made scarier, and those two ships should have sma...
- by Ganthrithor - at 2011.11.05 22:35:00
|
102. Blaster boats still suck - Armor tanking + Blasters fundamentally incompatible - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Yeah, I don't think the changes really go far enough either. I'm comparing the Talos to the Tornado, Oracle, and even the Naga right now, and basically all three non-Gallente ships are superior for PvP. Just comparing shield / nano / cloaserange ...
- by Ganthrithor - at 2011.11.05 21:59:00
|
103. CCP - Whats up with the seeding? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Matthew97 wrote: Missile War wrote: and again people just want to test their failfits for use on TQ(90% atleast,some actually do have good intensions). while they have no intentions on trying to find bugs. Please learn to read before post...
- by Ganthrithor - at 2011.11.02 22:20:00
|
104. CCP - Whats up with the seeding? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Do it.
- by Ganthrithor - at 2011.11.02 19:46:00
|
105. Make SiSi Useable? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Cedric deBouilard wrote: Ganthrithor wrote: lol. "I want shiny sh*t that I can't possibly fly in TQ, make it so." grow up and HTFU you're ******* ******** and I can't wait to reset your terrible alliance so I can farm your awful ratt...
- by Ganthrithor - at 2011.11.02 19:26:00
|
106. Make SiSi Useable? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Missile War wrote: listen to CJ... my god....(feels weird to say this :S) ship testing > THIS IS A TEST SERVER, ITS FOR BUG TESTING, NOT Test-Your-FailFit-ship-server everything costs 100 isk > good cuz otherwise we couldn't fly anything...
- by Ganthrithor - at 2011.11.02 07:00:00
|
107. Make SiSi Useable? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
There are literally setups I want to test that can't be done with T2 items-- not only is the performance drastically lower, but a lot of them won't fit together at all due to fitting requirements. Making SiSi as much like TQ as possible? Are you ...
- by Ganthrithor - at 2011.11.02 04:57:00
|
108. Make SiSi Useable? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Hey, how about making some changes so SiSi is actually useful as a testing server instead of being a dumb waste of time: - Remove SP penalties for dying in T3s-- its a test server, why do I have to train for a week every time I lose a test setup?...
- by Ganthrithor - at 2011.11.02 01:44:00
|
109. Cyno effect... ummm ... CCP please take note - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
The new volumetric beacon effect looks fantastic. The new cyno out effect is ok. The new cyno in effect is absolutely eye-gougingly awful. There is nothing good about the new cyno-in effect-- the color sucks, the way it animates sucks (oh look...
- by Ganthrithor - at 2011.10.03 04:36:00
|
110. Engine Glare - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
The new color sucks-- down with purple engines. The glows on the engines also seem a little more excessive. If anything, less glow and a better looking effect (like the scorpion or the loginscreen maller varient) would be nicer.
- by Ganthrithor - at 2011.10.03 04:26:00
|
111. CCP: Capital ship fuel bays? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Ganthrithor on 14/08/2009 21:04:49 Fuel bays are a terrible idea. ITT (as I understand it) CCP spends 6 months working out code to make their gimmicky blackops battleships actually useful and succeeds in breaking the only wonky fit ...
- by Ganthrithor - at 2009.08.14 21:04:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |