Pages: [1] |
1. frig and dessi hunter fittings - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
feihcsiM wrote: Twin web combat scimitar tell me more
- by Gilbaron - at 2012.11.15 02:13:00
|
2. Lasers. Names. Changes. Please read before reaching for your weapons. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Bagehi wrote: Harrigan VonStudly wrote: The proposed names in the list looks pretty common sensical to me. THe only thing that doesn't seem to fit, at least for me, is the proposed names for the 'focused' type. Currently they are a medium sm...
- by Gilbaron - at 2012.08.14 15:29:00
|
3. Lasers. Names. Changes. Please read before reaching for your weapons. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Takeshi Yamato wrote: CCP FoxFour In real life, the strength of a laser is often expressed in watts. Watts is a measure of the amount of energy per second they can put out. For example this article speaks about a megawatt laser: http://www.p...
- by Gilbaron - at 2012.08.14 15:12:00
|
4. Lasers. Names. Changes. Please read before reaching for your weapons. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
oh, and on a side note (hold your breath, NDA breach incoming): dust uses advanced and prototype as names for for higher level weapons, would be awesome if there was at least some consistency between the two games in that regard
- by Gilbaron - at 2012.08.14 14:54:00
|
5. Lasers. Names. Changes. Please read before reaching for your weapons. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
CCP FoxFour wrote: Salpun wrote: Siyis Rholh wrote: What does spriral even mean? :D It doesn't sound bad, but yeah. Its better then spinning Can't be anything like faint becouse that would sound like they are the worst ones. On wit...
- by Gilbaron - at 2012.08.14 14:50:00
|
6. Tooltip update today! - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
i wish we could have tooltips (and other functionality) that use the "dogtag" thing i remember from pitbull unitframes in WoW but since CCP does not want us to have a fully configurable interface we have to run with what we get. i really like the...
- by Gilbaron - at 2012.08.10 13:19:00
|
7. Why are "generalized" t3's betters at "Specialization" C... - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Lili Lu wrote: And we can expect these changes in 2023 judging by the past and current rate of balancing changes. edit- Seriously, please get faster at this. It's ok if you make some mistakes, as long as you keep revisiting quickly those mis...
- by Gilbaron - at 2012.05.27 01:35:00
|
8. Titan changes - update - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
so thats like 4 and a half hour between bringing up and issue and fixing it (doubt anyone cared about the defect since dominion) pretty impressive :) i hope he broke something really weird by doing so , just because i love how software works, n...
- by Gilbaron - at 2012.04.17 15:54:00
|
9. Titan changes - update - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
CynoNet Two wrote: CCP Greyscale wrote: Example: the "one tower per corp per day per system" rule is in principle hugely exploitable by having lots of corps anchor towers and then join the alliance. In practice and AFAIAA, it didn't get abus...
- by Gilbaron - at 2012.04.17 10:51:00
|
10. Titan changes - update - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
CCP Greyscale wrote: Harotak wrote: I personally like the idea of completely removing supercap ewar immunity. This is actually something we're evaluating at the moment, alongside a large built-in WCS bonus. The big issue is that it also m...
- by Gilbaron - at 2012.03.28 14:52:00
|
Pages: [1] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |