| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
21. CCP, is this what you really wanted? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The Op's post makes my head hurt... I'm simply making a post to let CCP know they are doing a good job and to keep up the hard work. Don't listen to the craptastic rant of the Op.
- by Gizznitt Malikite - at 2015.03.19 18:56:21
|
22. JUMP FATIGUE we dont want it any more, please remove from eve! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
If my alliance lived in the middle of blue space, I'd find jump fatigue extremely annoying. However, we live on the edge of coalition territory, purposely next to hostiles. For us, small gang activity has increased with the implementation of jum...
- by Gizznitt Malikite - at 2015.03.17 18:22:17
|
23. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Iski Zuki DaSen wrote: When i like to play with small ships frigates and destros i go to FW when i want to conquer something i think i might need a bigger boat E-Link can be fitted in : Ceptors frigates destroyers = NO Cruisers = Maybe Battl...
- by Gizznitt Malikite - at 2015.03.10 17:30:19
|
24. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Promiscuous Female wrote: Gizznitt Malikite wrote: And the celestis isn't there to catch the interceptor, only to neutralize it. You don't have to destroy an opponent to inhibit them. the best part is where everyone has given up on the d...
- by Gizznitt Malikite - at 2015.03.09 22:28:50
|
25. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Promiscuous Female wrote: God's Apples wrote: I really don't see how inties are a problem. One info linked maulus/keres/celestis prevents at least 3 ships from locking anywhere past linked FN web huginn/rapier web range. Even if the inty or ...
- by Gizznitt Malikite - at 2015.03.09 22:18:41
|
26. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Andrea Keuvo wrote: Gizznitt Malikite wrote: FT Diomedes wrote: Gizznitt Malikite wrote: FT Diomedes wrote: All these proponents of the system keep thinking in terms of a 1v1. "I counter your off-grid boosted trollceptor with my Cer...
- by Gizznitt Malikite - at 2015.03.09 21:23:38
|
27. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
FT Diomedes wrote: Gizznitt Malikite wrote: FT Diomedes wrote: All these proponents of the system keep thinking in terms of a 1v1. "I counter your off-grid boosted trollceptor with my Cerberus and my cyno alt in a Maulus." Yes, Dominion ...
- by Gizznitt Malikite - at 2015.03.09 20:45:13
|
28. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
FT Diomedes wrote: All these proponents of the system keep thinking in terms of a 1v1. "I counter your off-grid boosted trollceptor with my Cerberus and my cyno alt in a Maulus." Yes, Dominion sovereignty might not be perfect, but it is a damn...
- by Gizznitt Malikite - at 2015.03.09 20:21:15
|
29. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
John McCreedy wrote: Gizznitt Malikite wrote: You only have to defend the structure that is being attacked... A lone interceptor can only RF on structure at a time... A group of interceptors would simply require a similar group of defenders ...
- by Gizznitt Malikite - at 2015.03.09 19:09:23
|
30. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
John McCreedy wrote: MASSADEATH wrote: Corey Lean wrote: MASSADEATH wrote: The whole point is to end the sprawling wasteland of empty SOV space.... and this should do it. If a 30,000 man alliance cant have a few people with entosis shi...
- by Gizznitt Malikite - at 2015.03.09 18:03:12
|
31. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I think there is a lot of unqualified whining in this thread that makes me sad. CCP Rise, as demonstrated through his recent interview, seems to have a firm grasp of our fears. He also has pretty decent goals, and I, for one, appreciate the work...
- by Gizznitt Malikite - at 2015.03.09 17:53:55
|
32. Farms and Fields: the WTF moment - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I'm not impressed with this idea. Why do I want to use a WTF, as opposed to just running anomalies, belt ratting, and/or mining? I guess I don't understand what this WTF is....
- by Gizznitt Malikite - at 2015.03.06 22:03:13
|
33. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Devi Loches wrote: Gizznitt Malikite wrote: I've been thinking about these blitzing inty fleets. My first though was about all the tools at our disposal to counter such lol-fit ships, for which there are plenty. However, further pondering h...
- by Gizznitt Malikite - at 2015.03.05 02:45:14
|
34. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I've been thinking about these blitzing inty fleets. My first though was about all the tools at our disposal to counter such lol-fit ships, for which there are plenty. However, further pondering has brought to mine the underlying problem that is d...
- by Gizznitt Malikite - at 2015.03.05 01:09:22
|
35. The destruction of an ice mining corporation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Make friends in providence. It's a NRDS region of space that has lots of ice belts. I recommend contacting CVA before moving in, but they typically welcome PvE'ers into the area.
- by Gizznitt Malikite - at 2015.03.04 20:34:11
|
36. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Gypsien Agittain wrote: Zip Slings wrote: To address what seem to be the most common complaints people are having... 1. "OMG Interceptors will just win forever and stuff!" First, no interceptor can target out to 250km. Stop saying this non...
- by Gizznitt Malikite - at 2015.03.04 01:35:36
|
37. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Cr Turist wrote: Gizznitt Malikite wrote: Brother Mercury wrote: This patch makes it nearly worthless (save for POS BASH) to log in supers or dreads. j .... FYI: Supers can use gates now. FYI: Part of the new Sov System requires bei...
- by Gizznitt Malikite - at 2015.03.04 00:39:44
|
38. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Anthar Thebess wrote: Why not tie indexes to the vulnerability timer? Higher indexes , shorter timer. To benefit groups that really use their space. If in 90% of your systems you have at least level 4 index .... you gain something more in ter...
- by Gizznitt Malikite - at 2015.03.04 00:37:29
|
39. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Tykonderoga wrote: The prime time idea is garbage. The module to reinforce structures will be abused by ceptor pilots with pirate implants or a bazzillion people in ceptors. Think CCP! I know that no one in the company actually plays the game a...
- by Gizznitt Malikite - at 2015.03.04 00:33:20
|
40. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Brother Mercury wrote: This patch makes it nearly worthless (save for POS BASH) to log in supers or dreads. j .... FYI: Supers can use gates now. FYI: Part of the new Sov System requires being able to move around. You can do this slowly i...
- by Gizznitt Malikite - at 2015.03.04 00:31:00
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |