Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
21. Vote to sticky duplicates of the latest devblog in all places :) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I think the mistake is the actual GTC or ETC code... a mechanism used to help one player to pay for another players account without exposing themselves. Time Cards are used for only one thing, to extend play time, if they did not exist, players t...
- by Hamfast - at 2008.04.11 20:52:00
|
22. Open question to/about the CSM cadidates. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Jenny Spitfire I see tis. So I re-say. Taht dokument has copi protektion. If there is probelems and you canot make know the probelem to us. And if yuo do not listen to CCP, mabe you may not plai Eve anymore. So will you sti...
- by Hamfast - at 2008.04.11 20:27:00
|
23. To all the people that want to remove concord death insurance - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
First off, regardless of Concord showing up, concord is still summoned, and at that point all insurance should be void... This will not stop Suicide ganking, it was never supposed to, it was proposed to stop the subsidized nature of the Criminal ...
- by Hamfast - at 2008.04.09 18:00:00
|
24. Vote to sticky duplicates of the latest devblog in all places :) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Reptzo Originally by: Akita T Also, there's another argument nobody seems to have bothered tackling. Let's say that you are an alleged ISK buyer. Now, you could be a genuine ISK buyer, and you should be punished......
- by Hamfast - at 2008.04.09 14:32:00
|
25. Vote to sticky duplicates of the latest devblog in all places :) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
LetÆs see, I must be really Evil, I pay for 2 Wow accounts every month so my wife can play... I should make her pay for them... If I want to help some unknown player by paying for there account for a month I must be really evil... all you pirates...
- by Hamfast - at 2008.04.08 16:12:00
|
26. Final word: PvP is not griefing - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Djinn Phluxx Just curious....how does everyone feel about the following definitions? PvP = Consensual (or not) combat between two or more players Griefing (player definition) = Nonconsensual attacking of one player obviou...
- by Hamfast - at 2008.04.07 21:33:00
|
27. Reflections on the state of the economy - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Matthew Originally by: Vhor Kataar Edited by: Vhor Kataar on 07/04/2008 15:08:49 I agree on the "more stuff needs to blow up" part... The fundamental problem with just boosting consumption like that is that ...
- by Hamfast - at 2008.04.07 19:57:00
|
28. High Sec Griefing - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Anaalys Fluuterby You can turn this around on them if you feel daring though. Go ahead and join, warp with them. Right as your ship starts leaving warp, drop from teh fleet. If you time it right, you will still falsh red t...
- by Hamfast - at 2008.04.01 15:30:00
|
29. EvE is a Sand Box - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Avon Originally by: Cloora So stop spewing hate at carebears. We pay our money too so that CCP can continue to develop this wonderful for all of us. I think you are somewhat missing the point. You do all the rig...
- by Hamfast - at 2008.03.28 20:18:00
|
30. EvE is a Sand Box - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Avon Originally by: Exlegion Opinion. I respect it and understand your view. Nonetheless, it's an opinion. I happen to like building more than destroying. Build ships, build stuff, build isk, build commerce, build e...
- by Hamfast - at 2008.03.28 19:58:00
|
31. EvE is a Sand Box - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Billy Sastard Quote: Its a sandbox, if thats how they want to play, more power to them. They should be able to do that. There is nothing wrong with that. Yea its a sandbox, but why should the people who choose a m...
- by Hamfast - at 2008.03.28 19:51:00
|
32. A useful suicide ganking change? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Avon and Matthew, Question for you... (In an attempt to get around the alt abuse issue) How about if the Security gain base was limited to the difference between the attacker and the Target or 0.0 which ever is smaller... (As the base modifier is...
- by Hamfast - at 2008.03.27 15:57:00
|
33. A useful suicide ganking change? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Avon Originally by: Matthew The only way this could be at all balanced is if the sec status bonus from killing a criminal player was capped at a really, really low amount, and subject to the same timers as the NPC g...
- by Hamfast - at 2008.03.27 15:17:00
|
34. A useful suicide ganking change? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Avon Originally by: Hamfast I see your point, but if you do the math where the victim is someone with a Sec raiting of 0.0 then there is no security hit for the attacker (.08 * 0.0)/10 = 0 I'm cool with that too...
- by Hamfast - at 2008.03.26 20:34:00
|
35. A useful suicide ganking change? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Avon, I see your point, but if you do the math where the victim is someone with a Sec raiting of 0.0 then there is no security hit for the attacker (.08 * 0.0)/10 = 0 --------*****-------- Learn and be informed, because a Politicians worst night...
- by Hamfast - at 2008.03.26 17:05:00
|
36. According to CCP Policy, Jihadswarm must be BANNED ! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Little publicized fact about suicide bombings... the bomber dies most of the time...even if they kill nobody else... if they live they are referred to as "Failed Suicide Bomber" So if the Goons are "Role Playing" Suicide bombers, each attack sho...
- by Hamfast - at 2008.03.26 15:49:00
|
37. A useful suicide ganking change? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Avon Edited by: Avon on 26/03/2008 15:12:46 Originally by: Hamfast Personally, I would like to see Security hits for bad/good behavior be affected by the security of the system you are in... thus nothing you do ...
- by Hamfast - at 2008.03.26 15:35:00
|
38. A useful suicide ganking change? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Dianeces You have obviously never had to rat up security status before. It's pretty tedious, and (somewhat) time-limited. This is because you are doing something you do not enjoy... yet you feel you are required to do t...
- by Hamfast - at 2008.03.26 15:01:00
|
39. CCP screwup¦ - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Xaen Originally by: Hamfast It seems to me that Story Line Missions should be linked in some way to the missions that precede it... based on the agent used... R&D have no encounter missions, so no encounter type Stor...
- by Hamfast - at 2008.03.25 15:47:00
|
40. CCP screwup¦ - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Xaen, We have disagreed on several points, but on this one, you seem to be spot on. I run R&D missions, every few days I get a story line mission... and even the easiest encounter type are near impossible for my industrial self... Sure I can bui...
- by Hamfast - at 2008.03.24 18:39:00
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |