| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
still not seeing any mention about the dps being OP still in the slack group especially on the cloaky HK versions.. there just obsessed with tank
- by Harvey James - at 2017.07.02 09:20:57
|
2. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Rek Seven wrote: The tank on the covert options are garbage unless you fit a passive tank and to me, this alone indicates that the design choice behind this is flawed. So if CCP are going to stick with that, the DPS absolutely needs to be high!...
- by Harvey James - at 2017.06.23 11:50:06
|
3. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
that vid.. some crazy dps on those cloaky nullified covert T3 cruisers.. very OP ... the dps needs too drop on these ships, battleship dps on any fit especially the covert sub is just stupid ... covert as a defensive sub seems a bad move, you can'...
- by Harvey James - at 2017.06.23 10:59:53
|
4. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Dior Ambraelle wrote: It's not fun to argue with you if all you're doing is keep repeating the same thing over and over again, while ignoring all options and possibilities that would change these ships. I have to keep on r...
- by Harvey James - at 2017.06.21 15:55:12
|
5. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
As much as i applaud finding ways too reduce the T3's power level im not sure making there sig as big as an attack battlecruiser is quite the way, after all they are cruisers.. i tend too worry what the tengus sig will be after the change aswell.....
- by Harvey James - at 2017.06.20 10:06:02
|
6. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Omnathious Deninard wrote: These look like they will out tank and out DPS HACs still. i agree.. i think removing rigs is the best answer here.. as the ability too put on 3 T2 rigs means they always will have better EHP than HAC's, and since ...
- by Harvey James - at 2017.06.19 17:08:53
|
7. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
it would be so much easier too just bake all the stats and slots into the hulls instead of each sub adding/subtracting slots having different stats/drones etc... subs should just be about bonuses and nothing else with all changes in the bonuses/...
- by Harvey James - at 2017.06.18 10:38:27
|
8. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
tengu should have the kinetic damage removed .. versatility and all and just leave the Rof and velocity bonus.. the dps on all T3 cruisers needs too drop somewhat .. they can kill a battleship afterall with the dps -EHP+ low sig- high resists they...
- by Harvey James - at 2017.06.01 09:18:59
|
9. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
all the bonuses just seem too strong on the WIP... although its harder too know without the base stats etc.. I would like too know CCP Fozzies views on the cost increase thats mentioned and why? Also are you trying too achieve the jack of all tr...
- by Harvey James - at 2017.05.31 20:28:31
|
10. Sticky:Dev blog: Strategic Cruisers and You - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Blazemonger wrote: Harvey James wrote: I hate these exclusive little Focus groups that just excludes everyone else.. isn't there already a csm for that? removable rigs ... at 60 mil a pop for a set of T2 rigs.. does that really encourage ver...
- by Harvey James - at 2017.05.29 13:13:13
|
11. Sticky:Dev blog: Strategic Cruisers and You - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I hate these exclusive little Focus groups that just excludes everyone else.. isn't there already a csm for that? removable rigs ... at 60 mil a pop for a set of T2 rigs.. does that really encourage versatility? T3's need simplifying and cheapeni...
- by Harvey James - at 2017.05.29 09:33:26
|
12. Sticky:This Week in EVE #135 - Week 50/2016 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
these are the most pointless xmas gifts, the ship model ones.. why not actually be a hologram model of a ship?.. make them interactive and actually do stuff, instead of pointless clutter please.. how about a playable chess game with eve ships?.. c...
- by Harvey James - at 2016.12.22 14:25:30
|
13. Sticky:[Citadels] Supercarriers - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
excessive bonuses anyone? .. .still not adding the supercarrier skillbook then? .. HP amounts + hp bonuses too extenders/plates are just odd.
- by Harvey James - at 2016.04.01 13:21:38
|
14. Sticky:[March] Heavy Stasis Grapplers - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Admiral Icarus Raidriar wrote: Can't wait to fit this on my Prophecy. (Guessing it's a Medium Module) unless its turned into a battleship overnight then no..
- by Harvey James - at 2016.03.10 14:54:30
|
15. Sticky:[March] Target Painter Tiericide - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Cyrek Ohaya wrote: Could we have the targeting range of the Bellicose looked at?, these buffs are meaningless if the ship can't make full use of the new ranges, should be more on par with the Celestis and the Blackbird. Also look into the impla...
- by Harvey James - at 2016.03.05 21:52:13
|
16. Sticky:[March] Cap Batteries - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
so with the patch notes note .. we are stuck with these turd batteries
- by Harvey James - at 2016.03.04 19:33:07
|
17. Sticky:[Citadels] Changing NPC taxes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
CCP Ytterbium wrote: Niko Zino wrote: Stuff Those are fair points we've been discussing internally. Initial figures show us maintaining a cloning bay in a Citadel will cost 157m ISK a month, we wanted to provide means for the owner to rec...
- by Harvey James - at 2016.03.03 16:10:47
|
18. Sticky:[March] Cap Batteries - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Rowells wrote: Would it be interesting or meaningful at all, if capacitor batteries affected the rates and values involved with overheating? how about adding an overheat function too them maybe increased e-war resistance
- by Harvey James - at 2016.02.24 15:15:07
|
19. Sticky:[March] Cap Batteries - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Kasia en Tilavine wrote: Khan Wrenth wrote: Ergo, passive shield tanking is never worth it." But since the small/medium/large aren't hard-coded for use only on a sized vessel, you'll have to offer up a cap increase number appropriate for e...
- by Harvey James - at 2016.02.23 21:00:01
|
20. Sticky:[March] Cap Batteries - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Kalen Pavle wrote: How about we go one step further and completely change cap batteries to an active module? We'll continue with it providing (passive) resistance to nos/neut. Then we add an active whereby the amount of capacitor the mod provi...
- by Harvey James - at 2016.02.14 23:00:47
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |