Pages: [1] |
1. Sticky:New dev blog: Tech is fine l2p - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
This should be interesting!
- by Headerman - at 2012.07.19 22:53:00
|
2. Sticky:New dev blog: Anomalies revisited - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
So whats going on with the drone anoms? Has there been any news regarding the switch to a bounty system? Or any news regarding new faction loot from them?
- by Headerman - at 2012.01.17 09:07:00
|
3. Sticky:New dev blog: Anomalies revisited - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Desert Ice78 wrote: No, they didn't change anything, just fixed a bug. A bug/fix that has caused many people who were forced to spend more isk and time on getting the minerals/items/isk to PVP with, to now spend far longer mining, running h...
- by Headerman - at 2011.12.09 07:33:00
|
4. Sticky:New dev blog: Anomalies revisited - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
^^^ I too would like to know why Hordes are now worth less than half the direct ISk value of other Sanctums. There's been no increase in compound drops, and add in the fact there are no NPC stations in drone sec, and no bounties means double scr...
- by Headerman - at 2011.12.04 01:55:00
|
5. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
So any news on the Minmatar capital reballancing?
- by Headerman - at 2011.10.25 23:03:00
|
6. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Well i think CCP are on the right track for SCs. Remember this is the first attempt to re-ballance them, so more may happen down the track. Taking away the ability of smaller drones from them may seem like a bad mistake. It WILL farm out that rol...
- by Headerman - at 2011.10.12 00:34:00
|
7. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I think this sure opens the door to a potential sub-capital-brawler-cap, something that sits between a dread (out of siege) and a titan in terms of DPS and HPs, with bonuses to tracking rather than damage
- by Headerman - at 2011.10.11 04:56:00
|
8. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Di Mulle wrote: Simetraz wrote: What are you talking about ? In a situation you described there was no aggression. Nor even a recent session change, as proposed by others. So where is the problem ? Nothing changes at all. You are gone ...
- by Headerman - at 2011.10.11 04:19:00
|
9. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Mavric wrote: CCP Soundwave wrote: If you enjoyed these changes and things happening to spaceships IN SPACE I guerantee you'll love the rest of the stuff we have lined up for winter Keep an eye out for the blogs. Is it just me or does...
- by Headerman - at 2011.10.11 03:48:00
|
10. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Stealthiest wrote: How about a rename and some resizing. A super carrier that is not a carrier, but is the same size as a carrier? As a 2 titan, 1 mS owner I say bout f**king time for most of this, But no dd on Sub-caps at all? No drones on a ...
- by Headerman - at 2011.10.11 03:23:00
|
11. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Not sure if this will be read, but... To CCP Tallest: With the recent proposed changes to Dreads (removing drones, increasing damage when in siege to 700% as well as the 5% bonus to the Moros), will this see the Moros supplant the Naglfar as the...
- by Headerman - at 2011.10.11 03:09:00
|
12. Win a PC with NVIDIA, EVGA and MAINGEAR - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Glyken Touchon Originally by: Cys Root (fake)EDIT: wait..is this gunna be like the last failbook contest in which whomever creates the most BS accounts and votes/likes the most times wins? If it's anything like t...
- by Headerman - at 2011.04.13 03:53:00
|
13. An update on Level 5 Missions - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Hmm... Why don't CCP keep L5's in low and high sec, but create L6 agents in Null sec, that only pay marginally more than L5's? Ya still have to make it a group effort in either case. Everyone wins.
- by Headerman - at 2010.06.12 08:48:00
|
Pages: [1] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |