Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
61. [Issue] Fix Precision Heavy Missiles - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
All precision missiles need a buff, especially heavies.
- by Hellaciouss - at 2008.06.28 16:08:00
|
62. hey The Requiem! - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Zandramus was a gf aye...took you guys long time tho to get formed after our tussle in mb- before the takeing an hour+ to get big enough gang to engage us part sucks but at least you fight also-why does everything have to ...
- by Hellaciouss - at 2008.06.28 01:25:00
|
63. hey The Requiem! - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
gf requiem
- by Hellaciouss - at 2008.06.27 08:46:00
|
64. The real danger of nanos - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Your entire account should be banned from EVE, forever. Disgusting.
- by Hellaciouss - at 2008.06.27 04:50:00
|
65. Another Nano counter idea - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Sha'ara Sha'amashira Points to Crow Hawk Flycatcher Caracle Cerberus Raven They all have missile velocity per lvl bonuses related to ship not missile itself or launcher, just throwing that out there Missiles generally ...
- by Hellaciouss - at 2008.06.26 09:38:00
|
66. [VIDEO] F4R2-Q Fleetfight - in My EVE [original thread]
I am hearing a lot (I wasn't there) that this was not the whole fight and paints a picture of making it look like BoB did this much quicker then it actually happened. I understand cutting video to make it smaller but it seems there was a lot more ...
- by Hellaciouss - at 2008.06.26 08:14:00
|
67. Nano ships are counter productive. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Hellaciouss on 26/06/2008 05:26:52 Quote: The bold part is...well...its just stupid. From somebody who had their last alliance beating the sh*t out of him with caps and bs to say that is beyond...well..its stupid, theres no ni...
- by Hellaciouss - at 2008.06.26 05:27:00
|
68. Nano ships are counter productive. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Winterblink Oh look another nano thread. What a surprise. Coming from someone in an Alliance who fly nano only hac/recon gangs 99% of the time Tell us why you fly nano's and I'll argue it point by point and you'll l...
- by Hellaciouss - at 2008.06.26 04:44:00
|
69. :( - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Narciss Sevar The requiem... well at least it doesn't have alliance on the end.. Or a period.
- by Hellaciouss - at 2008.06.25 00:35:00
|
70. Why IAC fails and why there losing to AAA... - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Agmar Edited by: Agmar on 22/06/2008 07:21:09 tbh... this thread needs more Jim Lovell I liked your post better pre-edit. Got me all excited.
- by Hellaciouss - at 2008.06.22 07:23:00
|
71. So explain this whole nano thing for me... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
For one you need a microwarpdrive. Try this setup. 2x Polycarbon Rigs I 4x Overdrive II 1x Nanofiber II 1x 10MN MicroWarpdrive II
- by Hellaciouss - at 2008.06.22 05:54:00
|
72. [Issue] Speed - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Agreed. Speed needs to be reviewed.
- by Hellaciouss - at 2008.06.22 01:30:00
|
73. Consortium Alliance? More like INSRG II - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: Hellaciouss on 21/06/2008 23:07:09 Originally by: Viper ****zIe Also, they're going after IAC/CVA. Keep the love train coming \o/ (byob however)
- by Hellaciouss - at 2008.06.21 23:07:00
|
74. Nano fix - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Add scripts to webifiers that increase range but decrease the slow % to 25 out to 25km. Rapiers still hold their higher web range and higher web % at range. PROBLEM EFFIN FIXED! and damned easy to do to boot.
- by Hellaciouss - at 2008.06.21 02:16:00
|
75. T2 Missile Capacitor Recharge Penalty - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Faction > T2 (T2 missiles are a joke)
- by Hellaciouss - at 2008.06.20 22:08:00
|
76. Nice erebus -a- - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
GF
- by Hellaciouss - at 2008.06.18 21:38:00
|
77. More Lag now with Empyrean? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: Our systems are showing everything is working fine with no lag. It is your computer and/or ISP. aaahahaha. EVE doesn't lag, it's your computer guys.
- by Hellaciouss - at 2008.06.14 18:24:00
|
78. [Factional Warfare] Gallente FDU update (carrier downed in blackrise) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Bloody Rabbit Why would someone fit a warp disruptor and web on a carrier? The locking time would be just horrible. You've got a lot to learn, Young Grasshoppa. Carriers can be deadly offensive ships in the correct ...
- by Hellaciouss - at 2008.06.14 05:07:00
|
79. Factional Warfare? NAHH, NANO NOOB BLOB - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Quote: 2008.06.12 22:50:00 Victim: Rid****'s Corp: D00M. Alliance: NONE Faction: NONE Destroyed: Vagabond System: Security: 0.0 Damage Taken: 14742 Isk Lost: 658,595,818 (Total for this kill) Wut lulz. Though to give credit there was 4...
- by Hellaciouss - at 2008.06.13 02:40:00
|
80. Red Alliance Loses 3 Carriers - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Butter Dog The value of the kills is not in the ISK cost of the carriers, which is negligable. The value is in the killboard summary which features 40 drakes and 40 caracals from the Militia, and three dead RA carriers. It...
- by Hellaciouss - at 2008.06.13 01:06:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |