Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
81. CCP- REMOVE MINING AS A PROFESSION - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Selinate wrote: FFS just end it already. Nobody likes mining. No, not even you who is about to rage about removing it, since I already know that the second you start mining in your hulk up in high sec, you go afk so that you can do something el...
- by Hexxx - at 2012.03.23 18:35:00
|
82. Key points on how to do financial accounting for multiple characters - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Background: I've been working on the design of semi-automated financial accounting in EVE for a while now, this is primarily an outline on how to incorporate data from multiple characters for accounting purposes (primarily cost accounting so that ...
- by Hexxx - at 2012.03.23 15:56:00
|
83. Why Accept Bonds/Give Loans? - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Darth Tickles wrote: Jake Andarius wrote: @ Darth: It is really interesting that you approach discourse in the way that you do. From what I can tell you are saying that, rather than being completely honest and gregarious, there is a signific...
- by Hexxx - at 2012.03.23 15:31:00
|
84. Why Accept Bonds/Give Loans? - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Darth Tickles wrote: You guys are right. We shouldn't use our knowledge and experience to help others avoid pitfalls...not without getting paid anyway. I've learned a valuable lesson here today. So...I take it you don't like Objectivism?
- by Hexxx - at 2012.03.23 15:07:00
|
85. New Trader looking for an entry into the market. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
S'ylph wrote: Hi, I'm new to the world of EVE trading, and have always been fascinated by the market driven by players alone. I'm looking for a small loan to help me on my way. I think 1Billion is sufficient on my start. An ulterior motive is ...
- by Hexxx - at 2012.03.23 14:56:00
|
86. MIGHT bring the show back. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Magnu Stormhawk wrote: Utemetsu wrote: my backend has totally lost the will to import prices I suspected you were pulling the numbers out of your ass. Thanks for confirming ! I'm sure we can live without a show for the day. Keep up th...
- by Hexxx - at 2012.03.23 12:52:00
|
87. Banks. We need them. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Kara Roideater wrote: Darth Tickles wrote: Ok, I see that four people are really committed to keeping this discussion in the realm of make-believe even for internet spaceships. Four? I hope you're not including me in that number. I'm tr...
- by Hexxx - at 2012.03.20 13:24:00
|
88. Banks. We need them. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Darth Tickles wrote: ...I am confident my goals were achieved. We have much in common, you and I.
- by Hexxx - at 2012.03.20 13:19:00
|
89. Banks. We need them. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Kara Roideater wrote: Hexxx wrote: One of the very important points in talking about risk management is the difference between possible and probable. Right now, today, as we speak, it is possible that your Bank in RL could experience fraud....
- by Hexxx - at 2012.03.20 12:42:00
|
90. Banks. We need them. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Jake Andarius wrote: Hexxx wrote: Absolutely, but unless you're writing everything to two separate databases or making full backups every 5 minutes and retaining all of them....it's possible. You manage the risk by restricting who has direct...
- by Hexxx - at 2012.03.20 09:50:00
|
91. Banks. We need them. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Kara Roideater wrote: Hexxx wrote: Absolutely, but unless you're writing everything to two separate databases or making full backups every 5 minutes and retaining all of them....it's possible. You manage the risk by restricting who has dire...
- by Hexxx - at 2012.03.20 09:46:00
|
92. Banks. We need them. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: Jake Andarius wrote: Hexxx wrote: Absolutely, but unless you're writing everything to two separate databases or making full backups every 5 minutes and retaining all of them....it's possible. You manage the risk by ...
- by Hexxx - at 2012.03.20 09:36:00
|
93. Banks. We need them. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Jake Andarius wrote: Hexxx wrote: So basically you have a batch job setup on an hourly basis to query the deposit corporation API for player transfers and credit new deposits to the appropriate account. No button pushing, just a background s...
- by Hexxx - at 2012.03.20 05:15:00
|
94. Banks. We need them. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Jake Andarius wrote: Hexxx wrote: Deposits - These are recognized through a deposit corporation owned by the Bank. All player transfer type journal API transactions to the corporation are treated as a deposit. Deposits by characters not link...
- by Hexxx - at 2012.03.20 04:48:00
|
95. Banks. We need them. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Darth Tickles wrote: [ This is literally incoherent. You are now discussing why automation is better than audits when scamming. You have lost your mind in this thread, internet meltdown style. I appreciate how hard you're trying.
- by Hexxx - at 2012.03.20 04:27:00
|
96. Banks. We need them. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Darth Tickles wrote: Jake Andarius wrote: I just remembered one other thing that I had been wondering earlier in regards to the main topic of the feasibility of a bank in EVE. How difficult is it from a management perspective to actually run...
- by Hexxx - at 2012.03.20 04:25:00
|
97. Banks. We need them. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Jake Andarius wrote: KrakizBad wrote: This is less "trust isn't dead" than "there are always new suckers." I am confused about how that distinction is being made. If there are hundreds of "suckers" willing to invest billions of ISK in an ...
- by Hexxx - at 2012.03.20 04:18:00
|
98. Banks. We need them. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Darth Tickles wrote: Hexxx wrote: I'm glad you qualified your original statement, just keep in mind that if you change it later to "thousands" I'm going to call you on it. I haven't changed a thing. Cherry-picking lines out of complete a...
- by Hexxx - at 2012.03.20 03:30:00
|
99. Banks. We need them. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Darth Tickles wrote: Hexxx wrote: The comment is not a throw away; we have now gone from "Trust is Dead" to "Getting hundreds of depositors is impossible.". You may not agree with me, but at least I'm consistent. That is exactly the same ...
- by Hexxx - at 2012.03.20 03:09:00
|
100. Banks. We need them. - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Darth Tickles wrote: Hexxx wrote: [quote=Hexxx] I believe this is you realizing that absolute statements like "Trust is Dead" may not have been entirely accurate. Really, an emote and a throw away comment that isn't even justified...
- by Hexxx - at 2012.03.20 03:02:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |