| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1. Name And Shame Time : Teh Veto Corp Internet Spaceship Spy!1!!1 - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Verone This was released to the general population of Eve in the same context as all the other threads that name corp thieves, scammers and people who aren't to be trusted. It was intended as a warning to whomever attempts ...
- by Ikthorn Balhar - at 2008.02.05 21:25:00
|
2. Name And Shame Time : Teh Veto Corp Internet Spaceship Spy!1!!1 - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
As the person being accused of being the spy, I would like to categorically and emphatically deny these accusations. As Verone said, I have/had been in Veto Alliance for a little over a year, and Veto itself for about 11 months, and I would not ...
- by Ikthorn Balhar - at 2008.02.04 20:26:00
|
3. will you be able to secks with ambulation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Ekscalybur Originally by: Ikthorn Balhar I put on my robe and wizard hat... It took far too long for this to show up in this thread. Eve-O forums, you have severely disappointed me. Ikthorn wins by default. ...
- by Ikthorn Balhar - at 2008.01.17 21:49:00
|
4. will you be able to secks with ambulation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I put on my robe and wizard hat...
- by Ikthorn Balhar - at 2008.01.17 21:10:00
|
5. Dear CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'd settle with a comprehensive explanation of how command modules and links are supposed to to work, and how squad/wing/fleet make-ups should be affected, rather than have to guess at a lot of this stuff, or go by information that's almost 2 year...
- by Ikthorn Balhar - at 2008.01.16 23:33:00
|
6. WTS 8x 30 Day GTC - Secure Method Only - 190m/ea - in Timecode Bazaar [original thread]
That was quick. Many thanks!
- by Ikthorn Balhar - at 2008.01.16 04:16:00
|
7. WTS 8x 30 Day GTC - Secure Method Only - 190m/ea - in Timecode Bazaar [original thread]
Edited by: Ikthorn Balhar on 16/01/2008 04:13:24 One please!
- by Ikthorn Balhar - at 2008.01.16 04:13:00
|
8. This. Is a whine - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I fully support a change in POS mechanics that would allow anyone to unanchor any offline POSes or structures nearby after X amount of hours. I just want to keep space clean, you know... I'm tired of getting the Arazu detailed with all the little...
- by Ikthorn Balhar - at 2008.01.15 14:35:00
|
9. Who else sees this as greifing. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Akita T Translation: a) it's the "original" Jenny, but she's been succesfully trolling the forums for a good deal of time PRETENDING she's a n00bcake Very doubtful, as I was in a corp with the original Jenny, and their '...
- by Ikthorn Balhar - at 2008.01.15 02:44:00
|
10. The slow death of the Directional Scanner as a tool - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Siigari Kitawa Also, what I have quoted you saying I have received in a very condescending way. Please do not condescend to me when you don't even know me, and you have only a very small slice of a demonstration which I hav...
- by Ikthorn Balhar - at 2008.01.07 20:39:00
|
11. Nanoships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Ikthorn Balhar on 07/01/2008 19:57:18 Originally by: Daelin Blackleaf A set-up that disables the damage on one ship is far, far less effective than one that disables the damage on all ships firing on it. Especially when the...
- by Ikthorn Balhar - at 2008.01.07 19:49:00
|
12. Nanoships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Ikthorn Balhar on 07/01/2008 19:39:02 Originally by: Jonny JoJo You are correct that people do not think before they post. After all, you are seriously suggesting that if you ECM jam a nanoship, the ECM will somehow do dama...
- by Ikthorn Balhar - at 2008.01.07 19:38:00
|
13. Nanoships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Jonny JoJo Do you beleive it is acceptable to have a module that when activated, gives you 99.99% resist to all missiles and also gives immunity to turrets if you keep transversal up? You mean, like a racial jammer fitt...
- by Ikthorn Balhar - at 2008.01.07 17:44:00
|
14. The slow death of the Directional Scanner as a tool - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Siigari Kitawa Edited by: Siigari Kitawa on 07/01/2008 16:33:05 I then moved into a part where I did active scanning, and that should have shown you in real-time, how I do scan. I know what I'm doing, the first part was ...
- by Ikthorn Balhar - at 2008.01.07 17:37:00
|
15. Nanoships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Estephania My opinion is that ISK should not allow you to make an unstoppable pwnmobile out of HAC or BS or interceptor. There should be a reasonable limit to how much you can squeeze out of the ship no matter how much IS...
- by Ikthorn Balhar - at 2008.01.07 11:22:00
|
16. My Trip to WoW, 4 Days of WoW - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Ikthorn Balhar on 07/01/2008 11:02:17 Originally by: Terex193 Edited by: Terex193 on 07/01/2008 10:49:59 Four Days ago I decided to try World of Warcraft. Day one: The first few minutes were quite boring, mostly downl...
- by Ikthorn Balhar - at 2008.01.07 10:58:00
|
17. The slow death of the Directional Scanner as a tool - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I read the thread and thought about what people mentioned. Things like the angle setting resetting when you undock are indeed annoying and should be fixed. Wrecks no longer being visible in the scanner is an annoyance, but it has given low-sec mis...
- by Ikthorn Balhar - at 2008.01.07 10:31:00
|
18. Anyone in the LOS ANGELES, CA Area? - in Events and Gatherings Archive [original thread]
Sounds like a great idea. Will try to make it. -Ik
- by Ikthorn Balhar - at 2007.12.31 23:04:00
|
19. Your Christmas... - in Out of Pod Experience [original thread]
Like the boss said, Merry Xmas and Happy New Year. May they be fantastic for you, so the ransoms will be better for us!
- by Ikthorn Balhar - at 2007.12.25 00:22:00
|
20. Need a Avatar pilot asp - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Originally by: Verone QUICK, QUICK, I NEED A BULLDOZER, 300 MEN AND A LARGE RUBBER CHICKEN. I'M GOING TO STEAL TRANQUILITY. LARGE RUBBER CHICKEN REPORTING FOR DUTY, SIR!
- by Ikthorn Balhar - at 2007.12.19 22:24:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |