Pages: [1] 2 |
1. What class of wormhole is least likely to be colonized? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
C4's with C4 static
- by Induc - at 2011.06.13 17:59:00
|
2. Question about C3 wormholes - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Edited by: Induc on 19/11/2010 16:21:47 Originally by: Bilbo Baggin I would like to see the fit that solo tanks a c5 please.. Use your imagination, I'm guessing a 1b+ shield booster and some other expensive stuff. Edit: Ops didn't n...
- by Induc - at 2010.11.19 16:19:00
|
3. question to pos attack - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
1. Obviously depends a lot on the size POS and fleet size 2. Not if it's offline. 3. All, shield, armor and structure before it explodes.
- by Induc - at 2010.11.17 12:57:00
|
4. AFK stealth bullying - redesigning the cloak - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Originally by: Mackenna The only meaningful difference is that in scenario 2, you are affecting the (often limited) game time of the people in system who want to engage you. Baiting someone who isn't there is a complete waste of time, afte...
- by Induc - at 2010.07.27 19:03:00
|
5. C2 Wormhole Carrier - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Originally by: Julian Darklight I agree with others. a nice set of large guns an some missle launchers an ur safe. ... Large guns are pretty useless since they're only effective at hitting dreadnoughts. And to kill one with a couple of...
- by Induc - at 2010.07.18 17:48:00
|
6. Military Theory and Practice - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
So, what does Sun Tzu say about gatecamps?
- by Induc - at 2010.07.15 19:05:00
|
7. POS 0.0 - defence settings question - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
As said above, it's a locking time issue. With the stealth bombers tiny signtaure a small gun would take around 9 sec to lock it, and a medium around 30 sec, while a warp disruption/scrambling array would need almost a minute and a half. Also, yo...
- by Induc - at 2010.07.15 18:11:00
|
8. AFK stealth bullying - redesigning the cloak - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
The way you describe it sounds like the your only concern with afk cloaking is that they're invulnerable and impossible to catch. But how do they differ from someone logging in every few hours to check for targets and then logs off again? After k...
- by Induc - at 2010.07.07 03:40:00
|
9. AFK stealth bullying - redesigning the cloak - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Originally by: Innocent Murderer What is a con to adding a fuel requirement to a cloak? I'm still waiting for someone to explain how it could ruin things. Where would you get it? NPC sell orders? Free or not? However you decide to so...
- by Induc - at 2010.07.06 04:09:00
|
10. AFK stealth bullying - redesigning the cloak - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Originally by: Voith AFK Cloaking is broken and goes against everything Eve and real PvPers stand for: Risk. It allows a person to assume no risk and to effect the game of others. If you like AFK cloaking you should go back to woW. Aff...
- by Induc - at 2010.07.06 03:25:00
|
11. anyone have wh site accual statistics? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Originally by: Archestratidas I use a legion, but the numbers should be similar. With a t3's sig radius, you need a minimum of 650ish dps omnitank to do any site in a class 3. That's minimum and might be a cause for concern at times. Run w...
- by Induc - at 2010.06.26 20:39:00
|
12. Offline tower take downs - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Edited by: Induc on 20/06/2010 20:37:02 The hull resistances only apply to anchored modules and only when the tower is online. Originally by: Erich Benford Is the target picture with damage bars for the Tower updated accurately? ...
- by Induc - at 2010.06.20 20:34:00
|
13. 0.0 POS Setup Questions - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Amarr laser batteries also does not go offline when cpu shuts down, same with blasters, it's just missile batteries that does. Amarr towers are a popular choice since they have the most powergrid and therefore can fit the most guns. And check the ...
- by Induc - at 2010.06.18 19:10:00
|
14. Killing an ofline pos. - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Originally by: Taipan Leviathan And why do I have to kill the shield of an offlined pos? Because shield =/= forcefield
- by Induc - at 2010.05.26 01:42:00
|
15. cyno bubble trap - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
gl with that after tuesday
- by Induc - at 2010.05.23 15:01:00
|
16. Agression? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Person B.
- by Induc - at 2010.05.21 23:21:00
|
17. Advice for low sec mining survival? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Originally by: Julian Darklight DONT. i mine 0.0 but im in wormhole with a powerful lil corp an a large, heavily defended POS an cap ships nearby. thats the only reason i mine outside of high sec. if u dont have anythin similar, dont try i...
- by Induc - at 2010.05.20 14:08:00
|
18. Destroying my own POS--how? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Originally by: Andrea Griffin 4. Bubble the wormhole entrances. This will scare away most carebears and weekend warriors right off the bat. It won't do much to scare a real pirate group, but it will reduce traffic in your system. Serio...
- by Induc - at 2010.05.11 01:41:00
|
19. PVP in wormholes? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Originally by: Prad0r A competent scanner will have a 100% hit on you in one scan. You will have one 6-7sec window of opportunity to see them on directional. After that you will usually be bubbled and sent back to k-space. And if you're...
- by Induc - at 2010.05.03 20:09:00
|
20. ECM Does not cancel scramming? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Yes, you're probably just crazy.
- by Induc - at 2010.05.03 02:36:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |